Active Patient Participation in the Development of an Online Intervention

Background An important and challenging part of living with cancer relates to the repeated visits to the hospital. Since how patients cope between these post-diagnostic visits depends partly on the information and support received from their physician during the visits, it is important to make the most of them. Recent findings reinforce the importance of training not only the health care professionals in communication skills, but providing patients with support in communication as well. Delivering such supportive interventions online can have potential benefits in terms of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to tailor information to personal needs. However, problems with attrition (dropout, non-usage) during the test phase and poor uptake after implementation are frequently reported. The marginal level of engagement of the patient as end user seems to play a role in this. Therefore, recent research suggests integrating theory-based development methods with methods that promote involvement of the patient at an early stage. This paper describes a participatory protocol, used to let patients guide a theory-informed development process. Objective The objective of this project was to apply a bottom-up inspired procedure to develop a patient-centered intervention with corresponding evaluation and implementation plan. Methods The applied development protocol was based on the intervention mapping framework, combined with patient participatory methods that were inspired by the participation ladder and user-centred design methods. Results The applied protocol led to a self-directed online communication intervention aimed at helping patients gain control during their communications with health care professionals. It also led to an evaluation plan and an implementation plan. The protocol enabled the continuous involvement of patient research partners and the partial involvement of patient service users, which led to valuable insights and improvements. Conclusions The applied protocol realized patient participation on different levels throughout the entire project. Early involvement, involvement on different levels, and flexibility in terms of planning and setup seem to be preconditions to creating a bottom-up inspired development procedure with (seriously ill) patients. Further research is necessary to find out if a more patient-centered approach improves the implementation and uptake of eHealth interventions. Trial Registration Netherlands National Trial Register ID number: NTR3779; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3779 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6TdfALKxV).

[1]  P. Butow,et al.  Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question-asking , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  R. Chambers The Origins and Practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal * ROBERT CHAMBERS ? , 1994 .

[3]  Nicol Nijland,et al.  Effectiveness of a Web-based Intervention Aimed at Healthy Dietary and Physical Activity Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial About Users and Usage , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  M. Sprangers,et al.  Postoperative information needs and communication barriers of esophageal cancer patients. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  L. K. Bartholomew,et al.  Intervention Mapping: A Process for Developing Theory and Evidence-Based Health Education Programs , 1998, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[6]  S. Dulmen,et al.  Barriers and facilitators to effective communication experienced by patients with malignant lymphoma at all stages after diagnosis , 2013, Psycho-oncology.

[7]  Anastasis D. Petrou Review of “Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do by B. J. Fogg” Morgan Kaufmann, 2003 , 2003 .

[8]  R. Hart Children's Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Innocenti Essays No. 4. , 1992 .

[9]  D. Cegala Emerging Trends and Future Directions in Patient Communication Skills Training , 2006, Health communication.

[10]  Nicol Nijland,et al.  A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[11]  F. Oort,et al.  Determinants of physicians' patient-centred behaviour in the medical specialist encounter. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[12]  Joseph D. Langford,et al.  Focus Groups: Supporting Effective Product Development , 2002 .

[13]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Effects of communication skills training and a Question Prompt Sheet to improve communication with older cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[14]  Sandra van Dulmen,et al.  Development of E-Info Geneca: A Website Providing Computer-Tailored Information and Question Prompt Prior to Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling , 2009, Journal of Genetic Counseling.

[15]  Jules Pretty,et al.  Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture , 1995 .

[16]  Richard L. Street,et al.  Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering , 2007 .

[17]  A. Ramirez,et al.  Involving users in the design of a randomised controlled trial of an intervention to promote early presentation in breast cancer: qualitative study , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[18]  Willem van Mechelen,et al.  eHealth Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities and Work After Gynecological Surgery: Intervention Mapping as a Useful Method for Development , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Contextmapping: experiences from practice , 2005 .

[20]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[21]  G. Eysenbach The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Persuasive Technology , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[23]  S. van Dulmen,et al.  Development and content of a group-based intervention to improve medication adherence in non-adherent patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[24]  Tine Curtis,et al.  Effect of a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Physical Activity and Improve Health Among Physically Inactive Adults: A Population-Based Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  I. Chalmers What do I want from health research and researchers when I am a patient? , 1995, BMJ.

[26]  Allard J. van der Beek,et al.  Empowerment of disability benefit claimants through an interactive website: design of a randomized controlled trial , 2009, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[27]  D. Roter,et al.  The impact of patient and physician computer mediated communication skill training on reported communication and patient satisfaction. , 2012, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  R. Street,et al.  Preconsultation education promoting breast cancer screening: does the choice of media make a difference? , 1998, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[29]  D Elbourne,et al.  Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[30]  H. Krouse,et al.  Video modelling to educate patients. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[31]  Cal Swann,et al.  Action Research and the Practice of Design , 2002, Design Issues.

[32]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  TASK-CENTERED USER INTERFACE DESIGN A Practical Introduction , 2006 .

[33]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  L. Degner,et al.  Promoting consultation recording practice in oncology: Identification of critical implementation factors and determination of patient benefit. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  P. Butow,et al.  The dynamics of change: cancer patients' preferences for information, involvement and support. , 1997, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  [Cohort multiple randomized controlled trial: a solution for the evaluation of multiple interventions]. , 2013, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[37]  Anke Oenema,et al.  Planned development and evaluation protocol of two versions of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention aimed at adults, including cognitive and environmental feedback , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[38]  J. Moen Health Promotion Practice: Power and Empowerment , 2007 .

[39]  Gabriele Jacobs,et al.  Imagining the flowers, but working the rich and heavy clay: participation and empowerment in action research for health , 2006 .

[40]  J. Popay,et al.  Rationale and Standards for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Literature in Health Services Research , 1998, Qualitative health research.

[41]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[42]  Imre Horváth,et al.  Comparison of Three Methodological Approaches of Design Research , 2007 .

[43]  E. Smets,et al.  Enhancing patient participation in oncology consultations: a best evidence synthesis of patient‐targeted interventions , 2013, Psycho-oncology.

[44]  H. Cayton Patient and public involvement , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[45]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Engagement in a Diabetes Self-management Website: Usage Patterns and Generalizability of Program Use , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[46]  J. Bensing,et al.  A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facilitates communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling: findings from a randomized controlled trial , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[47]  L. Anderson,et al.  Improving patient and provider communication: A synthesis and review of communication interventions , 1991 .

[48]  C. William Harnessing People's Creativity: Ideation and Expression through Visual Communication , 2001 .

[49]  B. McKinstry,et al.  A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[50]  L. B. Pierce,et al.  Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: a meta-analysis , 2009, AIDS.

[51]  R. Crutzen From eHealth Technologies to Interventions , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[52]  Roger A. Hart,et al.  Children's Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Innocenti Essays No. 4. , 1992 .

[53]  F. Kraaimaat,et al.  Patient participation in discussing palliative radiotherapy. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.