Interviewers' Voices and Refusal Rates in Telephone Surveys

As SURVEY RESEARCH uses telephone interviews more extensively, new methodological problems become apparent. One problem is response rates, which are generally lower than for face-to-face interviews. The reasons for the lower response rates are not known. Refusals in faceto-face interviews are often attributed not only to the content but to the respondent's perception of the interviewer during initial introductory phrases and impressions based on his or her appearance. In phone interviews these latter cues are absent, and auditory stimuli are the sole basis for evaluation. This implies that characteristics of voice and speech patterns provide major bases for first impressions, and may relate to acceptance or rejection of the interview. In listening to telephone interviewers at work one is impressed with their unique speech characteristics. Further, interviewers are characterized by high or low response rates, and they tend to maintain their

[1]  A. Mehrabian,et al.  Nonverval concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  W. Pearce,et al.  Nonverbal Vocalic Communication and Perceptions Of A Speaker. , 1971 .

[3]  William T. Packwood Loudness as a Variable in Persuasion. , 1974 .

[4]  C. Lay,et al.  Perception of the Personality of the Hesitant Speaker , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  A. C. Rencher,et al.  Perceptions of personality from speech: effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  George N. Putnam,et al.  The status significance of an isolated urban dialect , 1956 .

[7]  T. Pear,et al.  Voice and Personality , 1931, Nature.

[8]  D. J. Sharf,et al.  Relationship between the speech characteristics and effectiveness of telephone interviewers , 1984 .

[9]  David W. Addington The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception , 1968 .

[10]  H. Giles,et al.  Speech style and social evaluation , 1975 .

[11]  L. S. Harms Listener judgments of status cues in speech , 1961 .

[12]  D. S. Ellis Speech and Social Status in America , 1967 .

[13]  R. Rosenthal Estimating effective reliabilities in studies that employ judges' ratings , 1973 .

[14]  Hadley Cantril,et al.  Judging Personality from Voice , 1934 .

[15]  L. Streeter,et al.  Effects of Pitch and Speech Rate on Personal Attributions , 1979 .

[16]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[17]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Reducing Refusal Rates for Telephone Interviews , 1976 .

[18]  N. Miller,et al.  Speed of speech and persuasion. , 1976 .