The role of positron emission mammography in breast cancer imaging and management

April 2008 Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in women, touching the lives of roughly 213,000 women in 2006. In addition to invasive breast cancer, approximately 62,000 cases of in situ breast cancer were projected to occur in 2006, with 85% of these being ductal carcinoma in situ. Even with these increased numbers, mortality is decreasing. Screening mammography has been the gold standard for breast cancer surveillance for 3 decades and is credited with decreasing mortality by 33%. Because mammography has resulted in earlier detection of breast cancer, more patients today are candidates for, and choose, breast-conserving surgery instead of mastectomy. However, mammography is frequently inadequate as a planning tool for lumpectomy. In addition, it has very limited value in women with dense breasts. This may explain the finding that residual cancer can be found in as many as 30% to 60% of patients after lumpectomy, resulting in a second trip to the operating room. One goal of molecular imaging is to preoperatively identify which patients are best served by lumpectomy and define the margins for surgery by identifying metabolic abnormalities in tissue, potentially decreasing the number of second surgeries needed for resection of residual disease. Any technology that could more precisely map the extent of both invasive and noninvasive disease would lead to more precise surgery. This article will review the history of molecular imaging in breast cancer with a special emphasis on the use of the new technology positron emission mamography (PEM), in preand postoperative breast cancer management.

[1]  K. Scheidhauer,et al.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  R L Wahl,et al.  Primary and metastatic breast carcinoma: initial clinical evaluation with PET with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1991, Radiology.

[3]  R. Taillefer The role of 99mTc-sestamibi and other conventional radiopharmaceuticals in breast cancer diagnosis. , 1999, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[4]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Staging in patients with locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: current practice and prospects for positron emission tomography. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[5]  Mathias K. Fehr,et al.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET , 2003, European Radiology.

[6]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. O’Connor,et al.  Molecular breast imaging: advantages and limitations of a scintimammographic technique in patients with small breast tumors. , 2007, The breast journal.

[8]  A. Shields,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Measurement of Tumor Metabolism and Growth: Its Expanding Role in Oncology , 2006, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[9]  K. Hisada,et al.  Clinical evaluation of tumor imaging with 201 TI chloride. , 1978, Radiology.

[10]  Deepa Narayanan,et al.  High‐Resolution Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Compression (“Positron Emission Mammography”) is Highly Accurate in Depicting Primary Breast Cancer , 2006, The breast journal.

[11]  N. Avril,et al.  Positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of breast cancer , 2002, Nuclear medicine communications.

[12]  M. Mottolese,et al.  99Tcm-MIBI scintimammography in 300 consecutive patients: factors that may affect accuracy. , 1999, Nuclear medicine communications.

[13]  M. Merino,et al.  The Role of 18F-FDG-PET in the Local/Regional Evaluation of Women with Breast Cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[14]  Abass Alavi,et al.  Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypes. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  J L Sunshine,et al.  Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.

[16]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Combined use of MRI and PET to monitor response and assess residual disease for locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[17]  J. Ro,et al.  Predictive value of [18F]FDG PET for pathological response of breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[18]  B. Eisenberg,et al.  Incidence of Gross and Microscopic Carcinoma in Specimens from Patients with Breast Cancer After Re‐Excision Lumpectomy , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[19]  Pilot clinical trial of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission mammography in the surgical management of breast cancer. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[20]  A. Waxman The role of 99mTc methoxyisobutylisonitrile in imaging breast cancer , 1997 .

[21]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  A. Waxman The role of (99m)Tc methoxyisobutylisonitrile in imaging breast cancer. , 1997, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[23]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  A D Waxman,et al.  Thallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of mass abnormalities of the breast. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  K. Tonkin,et al.  Clinical production, stability studies and PET imaging with 16-alpha-[18F]fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) in ER positive breast cancer patients. , 2007, Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[26]  H. Minn,et al.  [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose scintigraphy in diagnosis and follow up of treatment in advanced breast cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  U. Pietrzyk,et al.  Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  L. Weir,et al.  The Value of FDG Positron Emission Tomography in the Management of Patients with Breast Cancer , 2005, The breast journal.

[29]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Cancer Detection with Whole‐Body PET Using 2‐[18F]Fluoro‐2-Deoxy‐D-Glucose , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  P. Conti,et al.  Synthesis of [18F]‐labeled 2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro‐5‐methyl‐1‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyluracil ([18F]‐FMAU) , 2002 .

[31]  Shuu-Jiun Wang,et al.  The use of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile breast scintigraphy to evaluate palpable breast masses , 1994, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  P. Conti,et al.  Synthesis of 2'-fluoro-5-[11C]-methyl-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyluracil ([11C]-FMAU): a potential nucleoside analog for in vivo study of cellular proliferation with PET. , 1995, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[33]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with the standard staging procedures , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  David A Mankoff,et al.  Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging. , 2005, Seminars in nuclear medicine.