The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory

In two experiments, we investigated the role of perceptual information in spurious recognition judgments. Participants viewed lists of words in various unusual fonts. The frequency with which each font was presented was manipulated at study: Each font was presented with 1 or 12 different words in Experiment 1 and with 1 or 20 words in Experiment 2. Although the participants were instructed in a word recognition test to judge only on the basis of the word, regardless of font, there were significantly more false alarms for new words seen in a previously presented font than for new words presented in a novel (not seen at study) font in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, the participants were significantly more likely to make a false alarm to a new word seen in a font that had been used to present 20 words during study than to a font that had been used to present only 1 word during study. The data show a mirror effect, in which words tested in low-frequency fonts produced more hits and fewer false alarms than did words tested in high-frequency fonts. These results show that irrelevant perceptual information plays a role in recognition judgments by providing spurious sources of familiarity and, thus, provide evidence that perceptual information is represented and processed in the same way as semantic information.

[1]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition , 2003 .

[2]  M. D. Murphy,et al.  Are emotionally charged lures immune to false memory? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  H. Roediger,et al.  Associative Processes in False Recall and False Recognition , 1997 .

[4]  H L Roediger,et al.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering. , 1990, The American psychologist.

[5]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[6]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[7]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[8]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[9]  L. Jacoby.  Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading , 1983 .

[10]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  H L Roediger,et al.  Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word-fragment completion , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[14]  Lee Ryan,et al.  Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. , 1990 .

[15]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory , 1984 .

[16]  Mitchell S. Sommers,et al.  Who Really Lives Next Door: Creating False Memories with Phonological Neighbors☆☆☆★ , 1999 .

[17]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[18]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[19]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Reactions to blatantly contradictory information , 1979 .

[20]  H. Roediger,et al.  Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  W. Hockley,et al.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Felicia A. Huppert,et al.  Recognition Memory in Amnesic Patients: Effect of Temporal Context and Familiarity of Material , 1976, Cortex.

[23]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates , 1997 .

[24]  S. M. Sheffert,et al.  Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  L. Reder,et al.  What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer , 1992 .

[26]  Elizabeth F Loftus,et al.  Leading questions and the eyewitness report , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  J. Deese.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Specific Visual Transfer in Word Identification , 1987 .

[29]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Tricks of Memory , 2000 .