R&D management under short term pressures: a comparative study of the UK and Japan

This study compares the short-term behaviour of finance directors the UK and in Japan, in the context of their corporate governance systems, using the funding, structure and evaluation of Research and Development (R&D) projects as indicators. The empirical part of the study consists of two questionnaire studies carried out in the UK and Japan. A number of personal interviews were also carried out with UK and Japanese senior finance managers. The results of the study indicate different management behaviour with respect to short-termism in the UK and Japan. There is a statistically significant difference in perceptions between the finance directors of two countries. Managers in both countries appreciate and would like to use long term performance criteria to assess and manage R&D projects. In practice however, Japanese finance directors are much better protected from short-term pressures than their UK counterparts in dealing with most aspects of their management R&D. These differences in behaviour are identified and possible reasons for them are offered in the paper.

[1]  Chu Zhang,et al.  The explanatory power of R&D for the cross-section of stock returns: Japan 1985-2000 , 2004 .

[2]  Brian J. Bushee The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior , 1999 .

[3]  G. Stalk,et al.  Kaisha: The Japanese Corporation. , 1986 .

[4]  E. Fama Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[5]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .

[6]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Corporate Governance: Corporate Governance and Competition , 2000 .

[7]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[8]  Terence Cooke The evolution of financial reporting in Japan: a shame culture perspective , 1991 .

[9]  Colin Drury,et al.  A survey of management accounting practices in UK manufacturing companies , 1993 .

[10]  H. D. De Jong The Governance Structure and Performance of Large European Corporations , 1997 .

[11]  I. Demirag,et al.  The Effects of Organizational Culture, Structure and Market Expectations on Technological Innovation: A Hypothesis , 1992 .

[12]  Mitsuhiro Fukao Financial integration, corporate governance, and the performance of multinational companies , 1995 .

[13]  D. Leighton,et al.  Keeping Good Company: A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries , 1996 .

[14]  Hans Gullestrup,et al.  Corporate Governance, Accountability, and Pressures to Perform : an International Study , 1998 .

[15]  Noriyuki Doi Firm size and R&D activity in Japanese manufacturing industries , 1994 .

[16]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States: A Comparative Study , 1988 .

[17]  R. Tricker The independent director : a study of the non-executive director and of the audit committee , 1978 .

[18]  Béatrice Dumont,et al.  Comparing firms' triadic patent applications across countries: Is there a gap in terms of R&D effort or a gap in terms of performances? , 2006 .

[19]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[20]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model , 1989 .

[21]  M. Sobrero,et al.  Corporate Governance and Innovation , 2003 .

[22]  Michael Song,et al.  A cross-national investigation of the R&D–marketing interface in the product innovation process , 2006 .

[23]  W. Carl Kester,et al.  INDUSTRIAL GROUPS AS SYSTEMS OF CONTRACTUAL GOVERNANCE , 1992 .

[24]  E. Mansfield The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: external vs. internal technology , 1988 .

[25]  Kevin J. Murphy,et al.  Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives , 1990 .

[26]  C. Mayer,et al.  Banks and securities markets: Corporate financing in Germany and the United Kingdom , 1990 .

[27]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Mergers, sell-offs, and economic efficiency , 1987 .

[28]  Terence Cooke International mergers and acquisitions , 1988 .

[29]  Sources of structural stagnation in R&D intensity in Japan’s electrical machinery industry—an analysis of mismatching with IT functionality development , 2003 .

[30]  P. Gregg,et al.  The Disappearing Relationship Between Directors' Pay and Corporate Performance , 1993 .

[31]  Performance of Japanese firms in patented inventions; an analysis of patents granted in the U.S. , 1996 .

[32]  Dirk Heeremans,et al.  Strategic investment decisions , 1994 .

[33]  Michael T. Jacobs,et al.  Short-Term America: The Causes and Cures of Our Business Myopia , 1991 .

[34]  Terence Cooke The Influence of the Keiretsu on Japanese Corporate Disclosure , 1996 .

[35]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[36]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Industrial Innovation in Japan and the United States , 1988, Science.

[37]  P. Collier,et al.  Audit committee activity and agency costs , 1999 .

[38]  Mary O’Sullivan,et al.  Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany , 2002 .

[39]  Michael Bradley,et al.  Synergistic gains from corporate acquisitions and their division between the stockholders of target and acquiring firms , 1988 .

[40]  Kazuhiro Asakawa,et al.  Rethinking the public sector: idiosyncrasies of biotechnology commercialization as motors of national R&D reform in Germany and Japan , 2004 .

[41]  Ronald Dore,et al.  The Japanese firm : the sources of competitive strength , 1997 .

[42]  Colin Mayer,et al.  How Do Financial Systems Affect Economic Performance , 1999 .

[43]  J. Livnat,et al.  The economic value of the R&D intangible asset , 2003 .

[44]  I. Demirag Corporate Governance, Accountability, and Pressures to Perform , 1998 .

[45]  S. Kothari,et al.  Capitalization versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures versus R&D Outlays , 2002 .

[46]  R. K. Mautz,et al.  Corporate audit committees , 1970 .

[47]  Woojong Suh,et al.  Knowledge management as enabling R&D innovation in high tech industry: the case of SAIT , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[48]  K. Laverty Economic “Short-Termism”: The Debate, The Unresolved Issues, and The Implications for Management Practice and Research , 1996 .

[49]  I. Demirag,et al.  Corporate governance, accountability, and pressures to perform : an international study , 1998 .

[50]  P. Collier Audit committees in large UK companies , 1992 .

[51]  Mikio Enoeda,et al.  Overview of design and R&D of test blankets in Japan , 2006 .

[52]  Martha Prevezer,et al.  Capital Markets and Corporate Governance , 1994 .

[53]  Witold J. Henisz Politics and International Investment , 2002 .

[54]  C. Bergsten,et al.  Japan's growing technological capability : implications for the U.S. economy , 1992 .

[55]  Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes,et al.  Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation , 1999 .