Activity as a Mediator Between Users and Their Auditory Environment in an Urban Pocket Park: A Case Study of Parc du Portugal (Montreal, Canada)

Sound is receiving increasing attention in urban planning and design due to its effects on human health and quality of life. Soundscape researchers have sought ecologically valid measures to describe and explain the complex relationship between people and their auditory environments, largely employing laboratory studies and neglecting the active role of activity. This chapter proposes a situated cognition approach to study the relationship between context, use of space, and the ways in which users describe and evaluate sounds and their auditory environments in an urban pocket park. It draws on empirical data gathered in Parc du Portugal in Montreal, Canada using a mixed-methods research design that integrates ethnographic observations, on-site questionnaires, and behavioral mapping using a geo-spatial app to offer a situated understanding of the human auditory experience in its full complexity, with an emphasis on the mediating role of activity on the user-auditory environment relationship.

[1]  Sarah R. Payne,et al.  The production of a Perceived Restorativeness Soundscape Scale , 2013 .

[2]  Frank O. Ostermann,et al.  Digital representation of park use and visual analysis of visitor activities , 2010, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[3]  Carola Wingren,et al.  Evaluating soundscape intentions in landscape architecture: a study of competition entries for a new cemetery in Järva, Stockholm , 2017 .

[4]  Frits van den Berg,et al.  Quiet Areas and the Need for Quietness in Amsterdam , 2012, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  Paul Jennings,et al.  A Framework for Improving Urban Soundscapes , 2013 .

[6]  Jian Kang,et al.  Towards the Evaluation, Description, and Creation of Soundscapes in Urban Open Spaces , 2007 .

[7]  Daniel Shepherd,et al.  Do Quiet Areas Afford Greater Health-Related Quality of Life than Noisy Areas? , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[8]  George Revill How is space made in sound? Spatial mediation, critical phenomenology and the political agency of sound , 2016 .

[9]  Birgitta Berglund,et al.  The Swedish soundscape-quality protocol , 2012 .

[10]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research , 2017 .

[11]  Jian Kang,et al.  Effects of urban morphology on the traffic noise distribution through noise mapping: A comparative study between UK and China , 2011 .

[12]  Jian Kang,et al.  Modeling subjective evaluation of soundscape quality in urban open spaces: An artificial neural network approach. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Jian Kang,et al.  Landscape spatial pattern indices and soundscape perception in a multi-functional urban area, Germany , 2014 .

[14]  J. Schipperijn,et al.  Use of Small Public Urban Green Spaces (SPUGS) , 2012 .

[15]  Interrogating Place: A Socio-Sensory Approach , 2017 .

[16]  Chiara Bartalucci,et al.  LIFE+2010 QUADMAP Project: a new methodology to select, analyze and manage Quiet Urban Areas defined by the European Directive 2002/49/EC , 2016 .

[17]  Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez,et al.  Handbook of Research on Managerial Strategies for Achieving Optimal Performance in Industrial Processes , 2016 .

[18]  Luca Bertolini,et al.  Considering Sound in Planning and Designing Public Spaces , 2016 .

[19]  Konstantinos Vogiatzis,et al.  From environmental noise abatement to soundscape creation through strategic noise mapping in medium urban agglomerations in South Europe. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  Jian Kang,et al.  Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models , 2016 .

[21]  B. Berglund,et al.  A principal components model of soundscape perception. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  S. Timpf,et al.  Use and appropriation of space in urban public parks : GIS methods in social geography , 2009 .

[23]  Catharine Ward Thompson,et al.  Emerging relationships between design and use of urban park spaces , 2010 .

[24]  Helena Nordh,et al.  Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use , 2013 .

[25]  Kazunori Hokao,et al.  Developing Soundscapegraphy for the Notation of Urban Soundscape: Its Concept, Method, Analysis and Application , 2009 .

[26]  D. Levitin,et al.  Ecological validity of soundscape reproduction , 2004 .

[27]  Zachary P. Neal,et al.  Seeking common ground: three perspectives on public space , 2010 .

[28]  I. Aspuru,et al.  CITI-SENSE: methods and tools for empowering citizens to observe acoustic comfort in outdoor public spaces , 2016 .

[29]  David Whitaker,et al.  The importance of auditory-visual interaction in the construction of ‘tranquil space’ , 2010 .

[30]  Itziar Aspuru,et al.  Analysis of Field Data to Describe the Effect of Context (Acoustic and Non-Acoustic Factors) on Urban Soundscapes , 2017 .

[31]  N. Cosco,et al.  Behavior mapping: a method for linking preschool physical activity and outdoor design. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  Danièle Dubois,et al.  Knowledge, sensory experience, and sensor technology , 2014 .

[33]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  An Experimental Study on the Influence of Soundscapes on People’s Behaviour in an Open Public Space , 2016 .

[34]  Jian Kang,et al.  Acoustic comfort evaluation in urban open public spaces , 2005 .

[36]  Pall J. Lindal,et al.  Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes , 2013 .

[37]  C. Guastavino The ideal urban soundscape : Investigating the sound quality of french cities , 2006 .

[38]  Dick Botteldooren,et al.  The temporal structure of urban soundscapes , 2006 .

[39]  Jennifer Loy,et al.  Building relationships: changing technology and society , 2019 .

[40]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  Chatty maps: constructing sound maps of urban areas from social media data , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[41]  T. Andringa,et al.  How Pleasant Sounds Promote and Annoying Sounds Impede Health: A Cognitive Approach , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[42]  Jochen Steffens,et al.  Situational and person-related factors influencing momentary and retrospective soundscape evaluations in day-to-day life. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  D. Dubois Categories as Acts of Meaning: The Case of Categories in Olfaction and Audition , 1999 .

[44]  Lei Yu,et al.  Effects of social, demographical and behavioral factors on the sound level evaluation in urban open spaces. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Arturo Molina,et al.  Optimizing the Reconfiguration of Machining Desktop Micro-Factory Based on Scheduling Simulation , 2016 .

[46]  Danièle Dubois,et al.  A pilot experiment on effects of motor and cognitive activities on memories of soundscapes , 2015 .

[47]  Catherine Lavandier,et al.  The Personal Viewpoint on the Meaning of Tranquility Affects the Appraisal of the Urban Park Soundscape , 2017 .

[48]  Brigitte Schulte-Fortkamp,et al.  Mapping of Soundscape , 2015 .

[49]  Luigi Maffei,et al.  Ten questions on the soundscapes of the built environment , 2016 .

[50]  Jian Kang,et al.  Landscape effects on soundscape experience in city parks. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.