Male bimaturism and reproductive success in Sumatran orang-utans

Although orang-utans live solitary lives most of the time, they have a complex social structure and are characterized by extreme sexual dimorphism. However, whereas some adult male orang-utans develop full secondary sexual characteristics, such as cheek flanges, others may stay in an "arrested" unflanged condition for up to 20 years after reaching sexual maturity. The result is a marked bimaturism among adult males. Flanged males allow females to overlap with their home range and often tolerate the presence of unflanged males. However, wherever possible flanged males actively prevent unflanged males from copulating with females. Two competing hypotheses, previously untested, have been advanced to explain male reproductive behavior and bimaturism in orang-utans: (1) the "range-guardian" hypothesis, which asserts that the flanged males are postreproductive and defend a range in which they tolerate sexually active, unflanged male relatives; and (2) the "female choice" hypothesis, which asserts that flanged males tolerate unflanged males in their range because they rely on female preference to favor flanged males. We investigated these hypotheses and a third hypothesis that the two male morphs represent co-existing alternative male reproductive strategies ("sitting, calling, and waiting" for flanged males versus "going, searching, and finding" for unflanged males). Fecal samples were collected from a well-studied population in Indonesia, and eight human microsatellites were analyzed for 30 individuals that have been behaviorally monitored for up to 27 years. By carrying out paternity analysis on 11 offspring born over 15 years, we found that unflanged males fathered about half (6) of the offspring. Relatedness between successful unflanged males and resident dominant males was significantly lower than 0.5, and for some unflanged/flanged male pairs, relatedness values were negative, indicating that unflanged males are not offspring of the flanged males. Copyright 2002.

[1]  P. Nürnberg,et al.  Alternative Reproductive Tactics and Reproductive Success in Male Rhesus Macaques , 1994 .

[2]  M. Nozaki,et al.  Sexual selection in Japanese macaques II: female mate choice and male–male competition , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal , 1992 .

[4]  B. Galdikas,et al.  Subadult male orangutan sociality and reproductive behavior at Tanjung Puting , 1985, American journal of primatology.

[5]  P Taberlet,et al.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  S. Rossiter,et al.  Parentage, reproductive success and breeding behaviour in the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  M. Petrie,et al.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  Margaret F. Kinnaird,et al.  Male Social Behavior and Dominance Hierarchy in the Sulawesi Crested Black Macaque (Macaca nigra) , 1997, International Journal of Primatology.

[9]  M. Robbins.  Male mating patterns in wild multimale mountain gorilla groups , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  B. Goossens,et al.  Twenty New Microsatellite Loci for Use with Hair and Faecal Samples in the Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) , 2000, Folia Primatologica.

[11]  S. Wich,et al.  Food Competition Between Wild Orangutans in Large Fig Trees , 1997, International Journal of Primatology.

[12]  R. Sapolsky,et al.  Reproductive hormone profiles in captive male orangutans: implications for understanding developmental arrest. , 1999, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  P. Rodman.  5. Foraging and Social Systems of Orangutans and Chimpanzees , 1984 .

[14]  Caroline E. G. Tutin,et al.  Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  Jane Goodall,et al.  Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[16]  Singing performance, frequency matching and courtship success of long-tailed manakins (Chiroxiphia linearis) , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Behavioral Changes in Wild Male and Female Sumatran Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) During and Following a Resident Male Take-Over , 1995 .

[18]  W. Potts,et al.  Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. , 1994, Science.

[19]  D. Tautz,et al.  Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild living community of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  A. Dixson,et al.  Reproductive success in the mandrill, Mandrillus sphinx: correlations of male dominance and mating success with paternity, as determined by DNA fingerprinting , 1993 .

[21]  S. Bearder.  Lorises, bushbabies, and tarsiers : diverse societies in solitary foragers , 1987 .

[22]  A. Møller,et al.  Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments , 1992, Nature.

[23]  Christophe Boesch,et al.  Furtive mating in female chimpanzees , 1997, Nature.

[24]  R. Wayne,et al.  Estimating population size by genotyping faeces , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  M. Gross,et al.  Evolution of Alternative Reproductive Strategies: Frequency-Dependent Sexual Selection in Male Bluegill Sunfish , 1991 .

[26]  C. Boesch,et al.  Female reproductive strategies, paternity and community structure in wild West African chimpanzees , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Lounès Chikhi,et al.  A multi-samples, multi-extracts approach for microsatellite analysis of faecal samples in an arboreal ape , 2000, Conservation Genetics.

[28]  C. Schürmann.  Courtship and Mating Behavior of Wild Orangutans in Sumatra , 1981 .

[29]  B. Galdikas,et al.  Adult Male Sociality and Reproductive Tactics among Orangutans at Tanjung Puting , 1985 .

[30]  J. Mitani.  Sexual selection and adult male orangutan long calls , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  J. Altmann,et al.  Behavior predicts genes structure in a wild primate group. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J. Sugardjito,et al.  Residential status and seasonal movements of wild orang-utans in the Gunung Leuser Reserve (Sumatera, Indonesia) , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  I. Boyd,et al.  Low reproductive success in territorial male Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) suggests the existence of alternative mating strategies , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[34]  W. Dittus,et al.  Paternity assessment in wild groups of toque macaques Macaca sinica at Polonnaruwa, Sri Lanka using molecular markers , 1997, Molecular ecology.

[35]  D. Coltman,et al.  Male mating success in an aquatically mating pinniped, the harbour seal (Phoca vitulina), assessed by microsatellite DNA markers , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[36]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  J. W. Wood,et al.  Birth spacing patterns in humans and apes. , 1990, American journal of physical anthropology.

[38]  S. Perloe.  Male mating competition, female choice and dominance in a free ranging group of Japanese macaques , 1992, Primates.

[39]  T. Burke,et al.  Extra‐pair paternity in relation to male age in Bullock’s orioles , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[40]  P. Morin,et al.  Paternity exclusion in a community of wild chimpanzees using hypervariable simple sequence repeats , 1994, Molecular ecology.

[41]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[42]  K. Røed,et al.  Genetic relationships in the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) analysed by microsatellite DNA markers , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[43]  D. Lank,et al.  The resident's dilemma: a female choice model for the evolution of alternative mating strategies in lekking male ruffs (Philomachus pugnax) , 1997 .

[44]  B. Smuts.  Sexual competition and mate choice , 1987 .

[45]  J. Mitani,et al.  Mating behaviour of male orangutans in the Kutai Game Reserve, Indonesia , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  M. Huffman,et al.  Influences of female partner preference on potential reproductive outcome in Japanese macaques. , 1992, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[47]  P. Smouse,et al.  Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. , 1988, Genetics.

[48]  R. Dawkins,et al.  Evolutionarily stable nesting strategy in a digger wasp. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  W. Scheffrahn,et al.  Social and Genetic Aspects of Paternity in Wild Long-Tailed Macaques (Macaca Fascicularis) , 1994 .

[50]  S. Leigh,et al.  Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes , 1995, American journal of primatology.

[51]  J. Epplen,et al.  Amplification of microsatellites adapted from human systems in faecal DNA of wild Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) , 1998, Electrophoresis.

[52]  E. Forsgren,et al.  Should females prefer dominant males? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  C. P. Schaik,et al.  Spatial variation in the structure and litterfall of a Sumatran rain forest , 1985 .

[54]  S. Leigh.  Socioecology and the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in anthropoid primates. , 1995, American journal of physical anthropology.

[55]  J. G. van Rhijn,et al.  Behavioural dimorphism in male ruffs Philomachus pugnax (L.) , 1973 .

[56]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[57]  C. Schaik,et al.  Great Ape Societies: Toward an understanding of the orangutan's social system , 1996 .

[58]  Uma Ramakrishnan,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Group Composition and Breeding System in a Wild Common Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) Population , 2000, International Journal of Primatology.

[59]  J. Mackinnon.  The behaviour and ecology of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) , 1974 .

[60]  M. Andersson.  Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird , 1982, Nature.

[61]  M. Bruford,et al.  Human microsatellites applicable for analysis of genetic variation in apes and Old World monkeys. , 1996, The Journal of heredity.

[62]  T. Jones,et al.  Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[64]  R. Wayne,et al.  Facts from feces revisited. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.