Understanding strategy selection

This paper explores several issues associated with explanations of why different people use different strategies for learning and inference tasks. It is suggested that although the concept of cognitive style is a useful starting point, it is unable to account for many findings in the literature, and that any model of strategy usage that confines itself to mechanisms governing strategy selection is incomplete. In addition, it is necessary to take account of strategy availability: Which strategies do people possess, and how do people discover new strategies? Several findings in the literature indicate that strategy discovery is related to general abilities. Specifically, those who are best able to execute a current strategy are those who are the most likely to identify new, more effective methods. It is suggested that many findings that support the notion of cognitive style can be reinterpreted in this light.

[1]  G. Pask.  Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies, and Conceptual or Learning Style , 1988 .

[2]  Mark T. Keane,et al.  Cognitive Psychology: A Student's Handbook , 1990 .

[3]  R. Siegler.  Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[4]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Field Dependence-Independence Construct: Some, One, or None. , 1981 .

[5]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research. , 1989 .

[6]  R. Snow.  Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in learning. , 1989 .

[7]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Are Cognitive Styles Still in Style , 1997 .

[8]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Memory performance and competencies : issues in growth and development , 1995 .

[9]  Earl Hunt,et al.  Individual Differences in the Verification of Sentence-Picture Relationships , 1978 .

[10]  Maxwell J. Roberts.  Individual differences in reasoning strategies: A problem to solve or an opportunity to seize? , 2000 .

[11]  G. d'Ydewalle,et al.  Deductive Reasoning and Strategies , 1999 .

[12]  J. Weinman.  Non-cognitive determinants of perceptual problem-solving strategies , 1987 .

[13]  F. Weinert,et al.  Metacognition, motivation, and understanding , 1987 .

[14]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  Individual Differences and Conceptual Models in Training Novice Users , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  E. Barratt,et al.  An Analysis of Verbal Reports of Solving Spatial Problems as an Aid in Defining Spatial Factors , 1953 .

[16]  M Roberts.  Individual differences and strategy selection in problem solving. , 1991 .

[17]  K. Crowley,et al.  Constraints On Learning in Nonprivileged Domains , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Maxwell J. Roberts,et al.  Reasoning with Raven : with and without help , 1996 .

[19]  R. Sternberg,et al.  An Aptitude-Strategy Interaction in Linear Syllogistic Reasoning. , 1980 .

[20]  John W. French,et al.  The Relationship of Problem-Solving Styles to the Factor Composition of Tests1 , 1965 .

[21]  J. Marquer,et al.  Reaction Times in the Study of Strategies in Sentence–Picture Verification: A Reconsideration , 1990 .

[22]  Gordon Pask,et al.  Learning Strategies and Individual Competence. , 1972 .

[23]  R. Schmeck,et al.  Learning strategies and learning styles , 1988 .

[24]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[25]  P. Smith,et al.  Critical Notice: Deadly Tenacity and Almost Diabolical Cunning , 1989 .

[26]  G. Pask.  STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[27]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Effects of Aptitudes, Strategy Training, and Task Facets on Spatial Task Performance. , 1984 .

[28]  John W. French,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF PROBLEM-SOLVING STYLES TO THE FACTOR COMPOSITION OF TESTS , 1963 .

[29]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Stages, Levels, Styles or Strategies: dilemmas in the description of thinking , 1979 .

[30]  Ronald R. Schmeck,et al.  Individual differences in cognition , 1983 .

[31]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[32]  David J. Gilmore,et al.  The sentence—picture verification task: Methodological and theoretical difficulties , 1994 .

[33]  A. Schoenfeld.  Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education , 1987 .

[34]  J Baron,et al.  Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: deduction rules or mental models? , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  S. Stein.  What's All the Fuss About? , 1996 .

[36]  Paul Kline,et al.  Intelligence: The Psychometric View , 1990 .

[37]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1988, Cognitive Science.

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  Invariants of human behavior. , 1990, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Componential modeling of alternative strategies for performing spatial tasks , 1984 .

[40]  R. Logie,et al.  Working memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Eric A. Jenkins,et al.  How Children Discover New Strategies , 1989 .

[42]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Toward a theory of impasse-driven learning , 1988 .

[43]  Graeme Douglas,et al.  Individual Differences in Thinking: cognitive and neurophysiological perspectives , 1993 .

[44]  D. J. Gilmore,et al.  Individual differences and strategy selection in reasoning , 1997 .

[45]  J. Bruner.  Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing , 1973 .

[46]  Lee W. Gregg,et al.  Knowledge and cognition , 1974 .

[47]  A. Brown.  Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[48]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[49]  J. Bruner.  Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing , 1973 .

[50]  M. Just,et al.  Cognitive coordinate systems: accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. , 1985, Psychological review.

[51]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  Strategy Discovery as a Competitive Negotiation between Metacognitive and Associative Mechanisms , 1997 .

[52]  Marilyn Ford,et al.  Two modes of mental representation and problem solution in syllogistic reasoning , 1995, Cognition.

[53]  A. Newell.  You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium , 1973 .

[54]  Elizabeth J. Newton,et al.  An experimental study of strategy development , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[55]  K. Crowley,et al.  The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[56]  Maxwell J. Roberts,et al.  Human Reasoning: Deduction Rules or Mental Models, or Both? , 1993 .

[57]  H. Lang,et al.  Learning styles of deaf college students and instructors' teaching emphases. , 1999, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[58]  Earl Hunt,et al.  Strategy choice and strategy training in sentence—picture verification , 1980 .