Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age

Abstract Fully automated self-driving cars, with expected benefits including improved road safety, are closer to becoming a reality. Thus, attention has turned to gauging public perceptions of these autonomous vehicles. To date, surveys have focused on the public as potential passengers of autonomous cars, overlooking other road users who would interact with them. Comparisons with perceptions of other existing vehicles are also lacking. This study surveyed almost 1000 participants on their perceptions, particularly with regards to safety and acceptance of autonomous vehicles. Overall, results revealed that autonomous cars were perceived as a “somewhat low risk“ form of transport and, while concerns existed, there was little opposition to the prospect of their use on public roads. However, compared to human-operated cars, autonomous cars were perceived differently depending on the road user perspective: more risky when a passenger yet less risky when a pedestrian. Autonomous cars were also perceived as more risky than existing autonomous trains. Gender, age and risk-taking had varied relationships with the perceived risk of different vehicle types and general attitudes towards autonomous cars. For instance, males and younger adults displayed greater acceptance. Whilst their adoption of this autonomous technology would seem societally beneficial – due to these groups’ greater propensity for taking road user risks, behaviours linked with poorer road safety – other results suggested it might be premature to draw conclusions on risk-taking and user acceptance. Future studies should therefore continue to investigate people’s perceptions from multiple perspectives, taking into account various road user viewpoints and individual characteristics.

[1]  M. King,et al.  Illegal pedestrian crossing at signalised intersections: incidence and relative risk. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Anna Fraszczyk,et al.  Public Perception of Driverless Trains , 2015 .

[3]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[4]  Despina Stavrinos,et al.  Attentional control, high intensity pleasure, and risky pedestrian behavior in college students. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using Ibm Spss Statistics , 2017 .

[6]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[7]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  Crossing at a red light: Behaviour of individuals and groups , 2009 .

[8]  R. McClure,et al.  Age and gender differences in risk-taking behaviour as an explanation for high incidence of motor vehicle crashes as a driver in young males , 2003, Injury control and safety promotion.

[9]  E. Petridou,et al.  Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[10]  Rune Elvik,et al.  How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving , 1997 .

[12]  J. Parkin,et al.  Barriers to cycling: an exploration of quantitative analyses , 2007 .

[13]  D. French,et al.  Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination method and findings. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Nidhi Kalra,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers , 2014 .

[15]  Adam Millard-Ball,et al.  Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities , 2016 .

[16]  P L Jacobsen,et al.  Who owns the roads? How motorised traffic discourages walking and bicycling , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[17]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[18]  M. Tavakol,et al.  Making sense of Cronbach's alpha , 2011, International journal of medical education.

[19]  B A Jonah,et al.  Sensation seeking, risky driving and behavioral adaptation. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[21]  Michael Sivak,et al.  A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia , 2014 .

[22]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[23]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles , 2015, Science.

[24]  Tova Rosenbloom,et al.  Sensation seeking and detection of risky road signals: a developmental perspective. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Christina M. Rudin-Brown,et al.  BEHAVIOURAL ADAPTATION TO ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC): IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[26]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect in Risk Perception , 2007 .

[27]  Carol Holland,et al.  The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians' intentions to cross the road in risky situations. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.