Consumer additive manufacturing or 3D printing adoption: an exploratory study

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore what underlies the development of the consumer 3D printing industry and gain insight into future developments and its potentially disruptive impact on the existing manufacturing industry. Design/methodology/approach A combination of approaches was followed. Initially a consumer 3D printer was purchased to gain first-hand experience as part of a practical research case study. Results were discussed with manufacturers and additional information was sought, and triangulated, via a survey and an exploratory bibliometric study. Findings Many characteristics are in place to identify consumer 3D printing as a potential disruptive technology for the manufacturing industry. For example, the cost of consumer 3D printing is lower than for traditional manufacturing. However, the current adoption rate is low and the user friendliness and technological capabilities need to improve. Research limitations/implications The main limitation is the exploratory nature of the study which does not allow generalizations. Practical implications If developments and adoption patterns continue, then traditional manufacturing industries, distribution channels and the transportation sector may become threatened. Social implications Technological advances in consumer manufacturing can potentially threaten several economic sectors, which can lead to loss of jobs and affect budgets of states of countries that depend on sales tax. Originality/value One of the first studies to employ experiments in combination with other methods to gain insight into adoption patterns and the disruptive nature of consumer 3D printers specifically, rather than industrial 3D printers or new business models as a result of 3D printing technology.

[1]  Leah Hoffmann Risky business , 2011, CACM.

[2]  Paul Hyman In honor of Alan Turing , 2012, CACM.

[3]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary Book That Will Change the Way You Do Business , 2011 .

[4]  John Irwin,et al.  Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers , 2013, Mechatronics.

[5]  M. Fink,et al.  The Potential of Additive Manufacturing for Technology Entrepreneurship: An Integrative Technology Assessment , 2015 .

[6]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[7]  Tere Vadén,et al.  3D printing community and emerging practices of peer production , 2013, First Monday.

[8]  Christian Sandström,et al.  The non-disruptive emergence of an ecosystem for 3D Printing — Insights from the hearing aid industry's transition 1989–2008 , 2016 .

[9]  Douglas K. R. Robinson,et al.  An alignment approach for an industry in the making: DIGINOVA and the case of digital fabrication , 2016 .

[10]  Manfred Walter,et al.  Rapid manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain: Alternative approaches to capacity deployment , 2010 .

[11]  M. Bogers,et al.  Additive manufacturing for consumer-centric business models: Implications for supply chains in consumer goods manufacturing , 2016 .

[12]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation , 2016 .

[13]  Eleonora Atzeni,et al.  Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts , 2012 .

[14]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[15]  Vojislav Petrovic,et al.  Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies , 2011 .

[16]  Eleonora Atzeni,et al.  Redesign and cost estimation of rapid manufactured plastic parts , 2010 .

[17]  LipsonHod Is Additive Manufacturing a Real Revolution , 2014 .

[18]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[19]  David Z. Zhang,et al.  Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation , 2014 .

[20]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive innovation: the Southwest Airlines case revisited , 2011 .