Congestion Aware Multipath Routing: Aggregation Network Applicability and IPv6 Implementation

Currently, the service provider network capacity utilization is low due to the shortest multipath based routing protocols Opens Shortest Path First (OSPF) and Intermediate System-to-Intermediate System (ISIS). Due to inefficient routing approach, certain paths can be overloaded and link capacity is required while alternative paths are unused. The overall network has to be dimensioned with higher link bandwidth requirements introducing additional line, linecard, routing engine and overall solution cos. This paper provides improved Congestion Aware Multipath Routing (CAMRv2) algorithm overview. The new network routing algorithm allows higher throughput, network load-balancing and stability to ensure lower congestion and data drop on critical links. The algorithm discovers unused network resources and dynamically adapts to the actual traffic load and displacement. The focus in this paper is on new parameters for path computation performance improvement. Additionally, detailed IPv6 source routing CAMRv2 implementation for parallel coexistence with present networks is presented. Finally, the new routing algorithm is simulated in several scenarios over aggregation network. The result of simulations have proved better performance and resource utilization of the proposed algorithm in sparse aggregation network in terms of load-balancing between uplinks to the core network

[1]  Ali Al-Shabibi,et al.  MultiRoute - a congestion-aware multipath routing protocol , 2010, 2010 International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing.

[2]  Haci Ali Mantar,et al.  An SDN Based Intra-Domain Routing and Resource Management Model , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering.

[3]  Peter Reichl,et al.  Adaptive multipath routing for dynamic traffic engineering , 2003, GLOBECOM '03. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37489).

[4]  Rod J. Fretwell,et al.  MFMP: Max Flow Multipath Routing Algorithm , 2008, 2008 Second UKSIM European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation.

[5]  Shailender Gupta,et al.  Comparison of on Demand Routing Protocols , 2013 .

[6]  Michael Jünger,et al.  Models and Algorithms for Robust Network Design with Several Traffic Scenarios , 2012, ISCO.

[7]  George Neville-Neil,et al.  Deprecation of Type 0 Routing Headers in IPv6 , 2007, RFC.

[8]  Ramki Krishnan,et al.  Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in Networks , 2013 .

[9]  Matthias Gunkel,et al.  Multi-layer interworking with rate-adaptive transmission technology - benefit and challenges of a new use case , 2015 .

[10]  Halim Yanikomeroglu,et al.  HetHetNets: Heterogeneous Traffic Distribution in Heterogeneous Wireless Cellular Networks , 2015, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  Zafar Mehmood,et al.  Comprehensive Experimental Performance Analysis of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocol for Different Metrics Values with Predefined Constraints , 2014 .