Plow quantitation with echo‐planar phase‐contrast velocity mapping: In vitro and in vivo evaluation

We present a multishot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) phase‐contrast implementation for flow quantitation. The measurement accuracy of this technique was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. A gated eight‐shot EPI phase‐contrast sequence (TR/TE = 16/7.4, 45° flip angle), with a flow‐phase interval of 32 msec and an in‐plane resolution of 2× 2 mm was initially evaluated in a pulsatile flow phantom. Subsequently, EPI phase‐contrast flow measurements of the ascending and descending aorta, obtained in 10 volunteers, were compared with flow volume data acquired with a conventional cine phase‐contrast sequence (TR/TE = 24/7, 45° flip angle, 48‐msec flow‐phase interval, 2 × 1 mm in‐plane resolution). Comparisons between flow measurements were made using data obtained with the flow probe and cine phase contrast as the standard of reference for in vitro and in vivo measurements, respectively. EPI phase‐contrast sequences reduced data acquisition times tenfold compared with cine phase‐contrast sequences. EPI phase‐contrast flow measurements correlated were with phantom flow (r = 0.98, slope = 1.1) as well as with aortic cine phase‐contrast flow volume determinations (r = 0.98). A 95% confidence interval of measurement differences between echo‐planar and cine phase‐contrast imaging, ranging from 2.0 to ‐ 1058 mL/min was computed. Ultrafast phase‐contrast flow measurements are possible. Multishot EPI phase‐contrast imaging provides high measurement accuracy in pulsatile vessels while keeping the image acquisition interval short enough to be accomplished in a comfortable breath‐hold.

[1]  P. Mansfield Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes , 1977 .

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[3]  E. Madsen,et al.  Tissue-mimicking gelatin-agar gels for use in magnetic resonance imaging phantoms. , 1988, Medical physics.

[4]  D Meier,et al.  Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. Bendel,et al.  Blood flow in the carotid arteries: quantification by using phase-sensitive MR imaging. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D. Firmin,et al.  Echo‐planar high‐resolution flow velocity mapping , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  D N Firmin,et al.  The application of phase shifts in NMR for flow measurement , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  S. Riederer,et al.  Analysis of T2 limitations and off‐resonance effects on spatial resolution and artifacts in echo‐planar imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D N Firmin,et al.  Vena caval flow: assessment with cine MR velocity mapping. , 1990, Radiology.

[10]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  C. Higgins,et al.  Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo validation. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  P. Gibbs,et al.  Real‐time flow measurements using echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  P Boesiger,et al.  Visualization and quantification of the human blood flow by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  N J Pelc,et al.  Arterial and venous blood flow: noninvasive quantitation with MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[15]  Kim Butts,et al.  Analysis of flow effects in echo‐planar imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  G. Mckinnon Ultrafast interleaved gradient‐echo‐planar imaging on a standard scanner , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  N J Pelc,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Blood Flow with a Phase Subtraction Technique: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[18]  M. Morton,et al.  Volumetric flow rates in the portal venous system: measurement with cine phase-contrast MR imaging. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D. Parker,et al.  Accuracy of phase‐contrast flow measurements in the presence of partial‐volume effects , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  J. Debatin,et al.  MR characterization of blood flow in native and grafted internal mammary arteries , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Normal heart: evaluation with echo-planar MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  D N Firmin,et al.  Real time blood flow imaging by spiral scan phase velocity mapping , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  N J Pelc,et al.  Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. , 1994, Radiology.

[24]  M. Boska ATP production rates as a function of force level in the human gastrocnemius/soleus using 31P MRS , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  J F Debatin,et al.  Interleaved echo planar flow quantitation , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  G C McKinnon,et al.  Interleaved echo planar phase contrast angiography , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  J Felblinger,et al.  Electrocardiogram acquisition during MR examinations for patient monitoring and sequence triggering , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  S J Riederer,et al.  Interleaved echo planar imaging on a standard MRI system , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.