Estimation of input parameters in complex simulation using a Gaussian process metamodel

Abstract The unknown input parameters of a simulation code are usually adjusted by the nonlinear least squares estimation (NLSE) method which minimizes the sum of differences between computer responses and real observations. However, when a simulation program is very complex and takes several hours for one execution, the NLSE method may not be computationally feasible. In this case, one may build a statistical metamodel which approximates the complex simulation code. Then this metamodel is used as if it is the true simulation code in the NLSE method, which makes the problem computationally feasible. This ‘approximated’ NLSE method is described in this article. A Gaussian process model is used as a metamodel of complex simulation code. The proposed method is validated through a toy-model study where the true parameters are known a priori. An application to nuclear fusion device is presented.

[1]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Circuit optimization via sequential computer experiments: design of an output buffer , 2002 .

[3]  S. M. Kaye,et al.  Global energy confinement scaling for neutral-beam-heated tokamaks , 1985 .

[4]  Jeong Soo Park Tuning complex computer codes to data and optimal designs , 1992 .

[5]  Allan W. Gregory,et al.  Calibration as estimation , 1990 .

[6]  Marcello Vasta,et al.  Parametric identification of systems with non-Gaussian excitation using measured response spectra , 2000 .

[7]  Joan M. Ogden,et al.  Baldur: A one-dimensional plasma transport code , 1988 .

[8]  Ramkumar Subramanian,et al.  Novel methodology for postexposure bake calibration and optimization based on electrical linewidth measurement and process metamodeling , 1998 .

[9]  Julian F Dunne,et al.  A spectral method for estimation of non-linear system parameters from measured response , 1995 .

[10]  J. Friedman,et al.  Projection Pursuit Regression , 1981 .

[11]  Jangsun Baek,et al.  Efficient computation of maximum likelihood estimators in a spatial linear model with power exponential covariogram , 2001 .

[12]  Jeong-Soo Park,et al.  A statistical method for tuning a computer code to a data base , 2001 .

[13]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[14]  Michael Frenklach,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation in dynamic modeling of chemical kinetics , 1983 .