A hidden Markov model for multimodal biometrics score fusion

There are strong evidences of that multimodal biometric score fusion can significantly improve human identification performance. Score level fusion usually involves score normalization, score fusion, and fusion decision. There are several types of score fusion methods, direct combination of fusion scores, classifier-based fusion, and density-based fusion. The real applications require achieving greater reliability in determining or verifying person's identity. The goal of this research is to improve the accuracy and robustness of human identification by using multimodal biometrics score fusion. The accuracy means high verification rate if tested on a closed dataset, or a high genuine accept rate under low false accept rate if tested on an open dataset. While the robustness means the fusion performance is stable with variant biometric scores. We propose a hidden Markov model (HMM) for multiple score fusion, where the biometric scores include multimodal scores and multi-matcher scores. The state probability density functions in a HHM model are estimated by Gaussian mixture model. The proposed HMM model for multiple score fusion is accurate for identification, flexible and reliable with biometrics. The proposed HMM method are tested on three NIST-BSSR1 multimodal databases and on three face-score databases. The results show the HMM method is an excellent and reliable score fusion method.

[1]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Arun Ross,et al.  Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  Switching between selection and fusion in combining classifiers: an experiment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[4]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Face Recognition by Elastic Bunch Graph Matching , 1997, CAIP.

[5]  Yufeng Zheng,et al.  A novel orientation code for face recognition , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Šarūnas Raudys,et al.  Statistical and Neural Classifiers: An Integrated Approach to Design , 2012 .

[7]  Jr. G. Forney,et al.  The viterbi algorithm , 1973 .

[8]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[9]  Ludmila I. Kuncheva,et al.  A Theoretical Study on Six Classifier Fusion Strategies , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[11]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Generalized hidden Markov models. II. Application to handwritten word recognition , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Xin Chen,et al.  IR and visible light face recognition , 2005, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[15]  L. Baum,et al.  Statistical Inference for Probabilistic Functions of Finite State Markov Chains , 1966 .

[16]  Rhee Man Kil,et al.  Optimization of a network with Gaussian kernel functions based on the estimation of error confidence intervals , 2001, IJCNN'01. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37222).

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  W. Peizhuang Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms (James C. Bezdek) , 1983 .

[19]  Horst Bunke,et al.  Hidden Markov models: applications in computer vision , 2001 .

[20]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Landmine detection with ground penetrating radar using hidden Markov models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..