Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters

Abstract This paper proposes a novel augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty. Calculation of the risk sensitivity (i.e., Sobol’ indices) with respect to uncertain distribution parameters entails significant computational challenges due to the need to evaluate multi-dimensional integrals, e.g., using Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS). The proposed approach addresses the challenges by defining a joint auxiliary density in the augmented space of both the uncertain distribution parameters and input random variables. It first generates one set of samples from the joint auxiliary density and then based on the corresponding marginal samples estimates the marginal auxiliary densities for the uncertain distribution parameters using kernel density estimation (KDE). Then the KDE estimates are used to efficiently calculate the Sobol’ indices. It relies on only one set of simulations to estimate Sobol’ index for all uncertain distribution parameters without the need to repeat MCS for each distribution parameter. It is especially useful and efficient for evaluation of risk sensitivity for systems with expensive models and large number of inputs and uncertain distribution parameters. The good accuracy and high efficiency of the proposed approach are demonstrated through two illustrative examples and also for different risk definitions.

[1]  Agus Sudjianto,et al.  Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Design under Uncertainty , 2004 .

[2]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Non-parametric stochastic subset optimization utilizing multivariate boundary kernels and adaptive stochastic sampling , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[3]  M. Shields,et al.  On the quantification and efficient propagation of imprecise probabilities resulting from small datasets , 2018 .

[4]  Loic Le Gratiet,et al.  Metamodel-based sensitivity analysis: polynomial chaos expansions and Gaussian processes , 2016, 1606.04273.

[5]  Leigang Zhang,et al.  Borgonovo moment independent global sensitivity analysis by Gaussian radial basis function meta-model , 2018 .

[6]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  Reliability-based sensitivity estimators of rare event probability in the presence of distribution parameter uncertainty , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  Extended Monte Carlo Simulation for Parametric Global Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization , 2014 .

[8]  John C. Brigham,et al.  Efficient global sensitivity analysis for flow-induced vibration of a nuclear reactor assembly using Kriging surrogates , 2019, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[9]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis in the context of imprecise probabilities (p-boxes) using sparse polynomial chaos expansions , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  A. Taflanidis,et al.  Sample-based evaluation of global probabilistic sensitivity measures , 2014 .

[12]  Yu Zhang,et al.  An efficient global reliability sensitivity analysis algorithm based on classification of model output and subset simulation , 2018, Structural Safety.

[13]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  A new uncertainty importance measure , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach , 2004 .

[15]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  The effect of prior probabilities on quantification and propagation of imprecise probabilities resulting from small datasets , 2017, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[16]  A. Taflanidis,et al.  Efficient Evaluation of Sobol’ Indices Utilizing Samples from an Auxiliary Probability Density Function , 2016 .

[17]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using low-rank tensor approximations , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  James L. Beck,et al.  SUBSET SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEISMIC RISK BASED ON DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[19]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[20]  Agus Sudjianto,et al.  Relative Entropy Based Method for Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[21]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Likelihood-based representation of epistemic uncertainty due to sparse point data and/or interval data , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Wei Chen,et al.  Analytical Variance-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis in Simulation-Based Design Under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[23]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Qiao Liu,et al.  A new computational method of a moment-independent uncertainty importance measure , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[26]  Michael Beer,et al.  Non-intrusive stochastic analysis with parameterized imprecise probability models: II. Reliability and rare events analysis , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.

[27]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[28]  L. Schueremans,et al.  Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis , 2005 .

[29]  J. Beck,et al.  A New Adaptive Rejection Sampling Method Using Kernel Density Approximations and Its Application to Subset Simulation , 2017 .

[30]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  Efficient numerical simulation method for evaluations of global sensitivity analysis with parameter uncertainty , 2016, Applied Mathematical Modelling.

[31]  Gaofeng Jia,et al.  Efficient sample-based approach for effective seismic risk mitigation of transportation networks , 2020, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure.

[32]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[33]  Gaofeng Jia,et al.  Investigation of impact of shoreline alteration on coastal hydrodynamics using Dimension REduced Surrogate based Sensitivity Analysis , 2019, Advances in Water Resources.

[34]  Zhenzhou Lu,et al.  A probabilistic procedure for quantifying the relative importance of model inputs characterized by second-order probability models , 2018, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[35]  Wenrui Hao,et al.  Efficient sampling methods for global reliability sensitivity analysis , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[36]  Siu-Kui Au,et al.  Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation , 2005 .

[37]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[38]  Bernard Krzykacz-Hausmann An approximate sensitivity analysis of results from complex computer models in the presence of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[39]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  B. Iooss,et al.  A Review on Global Sensitivity Analysis Methods , 2014, 1404.2405.

[41]  Min Li,et al.  Surrogate modeling for sensitivity analysis of models with high-dimensional outputs , 2019 .

[42]  Jorge E. Hurtado,et al.  Assessment of reliability intervals under input distributions with uncertain parameters , 2013 .

[43]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[44]  Michael Beer,et al.  Non-intrusive stochastic analysis with parameterized imprecise probability models: I. Performance estimation , 2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing.