MATERNAL AND NEONATAL OUTCOME IN OBSTETRIC CHOLESTASIS: A COMPARISON OF EARLY VERSUS LATE TERM DELIVERY -

Objective: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcome in Obstetric Cholestasis (OC) in early versus late term delivery. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Place and Duration of Study: Aga khan hospital for women (AKHW) Karimabad, Karachi, from 1st Jan, 2011 to 31st Oct, 2012. Patient and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. All patients of OC with singleton pregnancy, admitted for labor induction between Jan 2011 to Oct 2012 were included in the study. At or after 37 week of gestation, patient is offered labor induction. Patients were divided in two groups as in early term delivery (Group A) and late term delivery (Group B). Early term delivery is taken from 37+o to 37+6 and late term delivery at or after 38 weeks of gestation. The demographic, laboratory and clinical data of these patients were collected from their medical record. Maternal and neonatal outcome were analyzed using SPSS version 19. Results: The study found that in obstetric cholestasis patients admitted for labor induction, the risk of caesarean delivery was higher in group A (before 38 weeks) as compared to group B (after 38 weeks). There was no difference in postpartum hemorrhage and drop in hemoglobin between two groups. Obstetric cholestasis was not associated with adverse perinatal outcome such as intrauterine death (IUD), low Apgar Scores, respiratory distress and neonatal intensive care admission in both the groups. However more cases of neonatal jaundice were observed in babies born after 38 weeks. Conclusion: OC patients who deliver after 38 weeks of gestation have a higher chance of vaginal delivery without increasing the risk of IUD.

[1]  G. Dildy,et al.  Neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with elective term delivery. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  J. Thornton,et al.  Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and early term delivery versus expectant management, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: semifactorial randomised clinical trial , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  D. Wolke,et al.  Effects of Gestational Age at Birth on Health Outcomes at 3 and 5 Years of Age: Population-based Cohort Study , 2013 .

[4]  S. Price Obstetric cholestasis. , 1995, Nursing times.

[5]  P. Kirkinen,et al.  Good pregnancy outcome despite intrahepatic cholestasis , 2010, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[6]  C. Ambros-Rudolph [The specific dermatoses of pregnancy]. , 2010, Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete.

[7]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: Relationships between bile acid levels and fetal complication rates , 2004, Hepatology.

[8]  F. Facchinetti,et al.  ABCB4 and ABCB11 mutations in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in an Italian population. , 2013, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[9]  F. Lammert,et al.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial comparing dexamethasone and ursodeoxycholic acid , 2005, Hepatology.

[10]  L. Kupčinskas,et al.  Predictors of premature delivery in patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. , 2007, World journal of gastroenterology.

[11]  M. Serteser,et al.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: correlation of preterm delivery with bile acids. , 2011, The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology.

[12]  L. Sheikh,et al.  Factors associated with failed induction of labour in a secondary care hospital. , 2012, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[13]  D. Palmer,et al.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a critical review. , 2000, The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing.