Comparing AutoDock and Vina in Ligand/Decoy Discrimination for Virtual Screening

[1]  Saba Munawar,et al.  Molecular Docking Guided Grid-Independent Descriptor Analysis to Probe the Impact of Water Molecules on Conformational Changes of hERG Inhibitors in Drug Trapping Phenomenon , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[2]  Suman Sirimulla,et al.  AutoDock VinaXB: implementation of XBSF, new empirical halogen bond scoring function, into AutoDock Vina , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[3]  Garrett M Morris,et al.  Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  Michal Brylinski,et al.  Large-scale computational drug repositioning to find treatments for rare diseases , 2018, npj Systems Biology and Applications.

[5]  Daniele Toti,et al.  DockingApp: a user friendly interface for facilitated docking simulations with AutoDock Vina , 2017, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[6]  Dik-Lung Ma,et al.  Drug repositioning by structure-based virtual screening. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[7]  Chen Cui,et al.  Improving the Virtual Screening Ability of Target-Specific Scoring Functions Using Deep Learning Methods , 2019, Front. Pharmacol..

[8]  Rodrigo Quiroga,et al.  Vinardo: A Scoring Function Based on Autodock Vina Improves Scoring, Docking, and Virtual Screening , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  D. Fairlie,et al.  Comparing sixteen scoring functions for predicting biological activities of ligands for protein targets. , 2015, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[10]  Huikun Zhang,et al.  Machine Learning Consensus Scoring Improves Performance Across Targets in Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[11]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.

[12]  N. Rahman,et al.  Dynamics and binding interactions of peptide inhibitors of dengue virus entry , 2019, Journal of Biological Physics.

[13]  Julio Caballero,et al.  Is It Reliable to Use Common Molecular Docking Methods for Comparing the Binding Affinities of Enantiomer Pairs for Their Protein Target? , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[14]  Dariusz Matosiuk,et al.  Recent Advances and Applications of Molecular Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors , 2017, Molecules.

[15]  Michael M. Mysinger,et al.  Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Robin Taylor,et al.  Comparing protein–ligand docking programs is difficult , 2005, Proteins.

[17]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  FINDSITEcomb2.0: A New Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening of Proteins and Virtual Target Screening of Biomolecules , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  António J. M. Ribeiro,et al.  Protein-ligand docking in the new millennium--a retrospective of 10 years in the field. , 2013, Current medicinal chemistry.

[20]  Dan Li,et al.  Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[21]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[22]  Yaoqi Zhou,et al.  DLIGAND2: an improved knowledge-based energy function for protein–ligand interactions using the distance-scaled, finite, ideal-gas reference state , 2019, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[23]  Leonardo L. G. Ferreira,et al.  Molecular Docking and Structure-Based Drug Design Strategies , 2015, Molecules.

[24]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  Bernhard Y. Renard,et al.  Docking small peptides remains a great challenge: an assessment using AutoDock Vina , 2015, Briefings Bioinform..

[26]  Björn Windshügel,et al.  LEADS-PEP: A Benchmark Data Set for Assessment of Peptide Docking Performance , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[27]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[28]  Philip C. Biggin,et al.  Quantifying Water-Mediated Protein–Ligand Interactions in a Glutamate Receptor: A DFT Study , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[29]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4 , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[31]  Maria João Ramos,et al.  Virtual screening in drug design and development. , 2010, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[32]  Liliane Mouawad,et al.  vSDC: a method to improve early recognition in virtual screening when limited experimental resources are available , 2016, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[33]  Shigenori Tanaka,et al.  AutoDock-GIST: Incorporating Thermodynamics of Active-Site Water into Scoring Function for Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking , 2016, Molecules.

[34]  Jonathan W. Essex,et al.  A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[35]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Ligand Pose and Orientational Sampling in Molecular Docking , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Xiaoqin Zou,et al.  Advances and Challenges in Protein-Ligand Docking , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[37]  William J. Allen,et al.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[38]  Tingjun Hou,et al.  Importance of protein flexibility in molecular recognition: a case study on Type-I1/2 inhibitors of ALK. , 2018, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[39]  Pierre Tufféry,et al.  MTiOpenScreen: a web server for structure-based virtual screening , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Drug Discovery Using Chemical Systems Biology: Repositioning the Safe Medicine Comtan to Treat Multi-Drug and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[41]  Yutaka Akiyama,et al.  Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem , 2018, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[42]  Awanish Kumar,et al.  Docking and ADMET prediction of few GSK-3 inhibitors divulges 6-bromoindirubin-3-oxime as a potential inhibitor. , 2016, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[43]  Anna E Lohning,et al.  A Practical Guide to Molecular Docking and Homology Modelling for Medicinal Chemists. , 2017, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[45]  D S Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of autodock , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[46]  Yanli Wang,et al.  Structure-Based Virtual Screening for Drug Discovery: a Problem-Centric Review , 2012, The AAPS Journal.

[47]  J. Choi,et al.  BACE1 inhibitory activity and molecular docking analysis of meroterpenoids from Sargassum serratifolium. , 2017, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[48]  Maria Kontoyianni,et al.  Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[49]  R. Kroemer.  Structure-based drug design: docking and scoring. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.

[50]  Mohammad Mahdi Jaghoori,et al.  1001 Ways to run AutoDock Vina for virtual screening , 2016, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[51]  Diogo Santos-Martins,et al.  Receptor-based virtual screening protocol for drug discovery. , 2015, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[52]  Matthias Rarey,et al.  Small Molecule Docking and Scoring , 2001 .

[53]  Sheng-You Huang,et al.  Comprehensive assessment of flexible‐ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges , 2018, Briefings Bioinform..