Non-negative graph embedding

We introduce a general formulation, called non-negative graph embedding, for non-negative data decomposition by integrating the characteristics of both intrinsic and penalty graphs [17]. In the past, such a decomposition was obtained mostly in an unsupervised manner, such as Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) and its variants, and hence unnecessary to be powerful at classification. In this work, the non-negative data decomposition is studied in a unified way applicable for both unsupervised and supervised/semi-supervised configurations. The ultimate data decomposition is separated into two parts, which separatively preserve the similarities measured by the intrinsic and penalty graphs, and together minimize the data reconstruction error. An iterative procedure is derived for such a purpose, and the algorithmic non-negativity is guaranteed by the non-negative property of the inverse of any M-matrix. Extensive experiments compared with NMF and conventional solutions for graph embedding demonstrate the algorithmic properties in sparsity, classification power, and robustness to image occlusions.

[1]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[2]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[3]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  PCA versus LDA , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Stan Z. Li,et al.  Learning spatially localized, parts-based representation , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[5]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Yunde Jia,et al.  FISHER NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION FOR LEARNING LOCAL FEATURES , 2004 .

[7]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Mining ratio rules via principal sparse non-negative matrix factorization , 2004, Fourth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'04).

[8]  Hai Tao,et al.  Non-orthogonal binary subspace and its applications in computer vision , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[9]  Tamir Hazan,et al.  Sparse image coding using a 3D non-negative tensor factorization , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[10]  Pavel Pudil,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2006 .

[11]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Efficient and robust feature extraction by maximum margin criterion , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[12]  Shuicheng Yan,et al.  Learning Semantic Patterns with Discriminant Localized Binary Projections , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[13]  Stephen Lin,et al.  Graph Embedding and Extensions: A General Framework for Dimensionality Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Ioannis Pitas,et al.  A Novel Discriminant Non-Negative Matrix Factorization Algorithm With Applications to Facial Image Characterization Problems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[15]  Dong Xu,et al.  Trace Ratio vs. Ratio Trace for Dimensionality Reduction , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.