A video texture database for perceptual compression and quality assessment

This paper presents a new publicly available video texture database (BVI Texture) that contains test sequences and subjective opinion scores. The database exhibits a wide range of static and dynamic textures together with some mixed content. Each sequence is indexed using various video feature descriptors that characterize its spatial activity, temporal activity, static texture content and dynamic texture content. Moreover, rate/distortion results for the new dataset are presented after compression using HEVC, alongside subjective quality evaluation data. The BVI texture database will provide utility in testing quality assessment metrics and emerging video compression methods, particularly those based on texture analysis and synthesis.

[1]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[2]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A Perception-Based Hybrid Model for Video Quality Assessment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[3]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Mark J. Huiskes,et al.  DynTex: A comprehensive database of dynamic textures , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Xianghua Xie,et al.  Handbook of Texture Analysis , 2008 .

[7]  Michail-Alexandros Kourtis,et al.  Quantitative Performance Evaluation Of the Emerging HEVC / H . 265 Video Codec , 2012 .

[8]  Francesca De Simone,et al.  Subjective quality evaluation of the upcoming HEVC video compression standard , 2012, Other Conferences.

[9]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A Parametric Framework for Video Compression Using Region-Based Texture Models , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[10]  D. C. Howell Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[11]  OhmJens-Rainer,et al.  Comparison of the Coding Efficiency of Video Coding Standards—Including High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) , 2012 .

[12]  Irwin Edward Sobel,et al.  Camera Models and Machine Perception , 1970 .

[13]  Munchurl Kim,et al.  Assessments of Subjective Video Quality on HEVC-Encoded 4K-UHD Video for Beyond-HDTV Broadcasting Services , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[14]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  F. Bossen,et al.  Common test conditions and software reference configurations , 2010 .

[16]  Ke Wang,et al.  On the Optimal Presentation Duration for Subjective Video Quality Assessment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[17]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Analysis of Public Image and Video Databases for Quality Assessment , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.