A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations

In sustainability science, revising the paradigms that separate humans from nature is considered a powerful ‘leverage point’ in pursuit of transformations. The coupled social-ecological and human-e...

[1]  L. Jarosz,et al.  Nourishing women: toward a feminist political ecology of community supported agriculture in the United States , 2011 .

[2]  C. Holling,et al.  Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management , 1996 .

[3]  Emilie Lindkvist,et al.  Inequality and the Biosphere , 2018, Annual Review of Environment and Resources.

[4]  W. J. Boonstra.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Social-Ecological Resilience through the Lens of the Social Sciences: Contributions, Critical Reflections, and Constructive Debate Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions , 2016 .

[5]  William E. Connolly,et al.  A World of Becoming , 2011, International Dialogue.

[6]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[7]  J. Butler.  PERFORMATIVE ACTS AND GENDER CONSTITUTION: AN ESSAY IN PHENOMENOLOGY AND FEMINIST THEORY , 1988 .

[8]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Juan C. Rocha,et al.  Cascading regime shifts within and across scales , 2018, Science.

[11]  Tim Ingold,et al.  Beyond biology and culture. The meaning of evolution in a relational world , 2004 .

[12]  R. Aldrich.  From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior , 2008 .

[13]  I. Prigogine,et al.  From Being to Becoming: Time and Complexity in the Physical Sciences , 1982 .

[14]  T. Ingold.  Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description , 2011 .

[15]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Interrupting the Anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and Depoliticizing Ontologies in the Anthropocene , 2018 .

[16]  I. Darnhofer.  Farming from a Process‐Relational Perspective: Making Openings for Change Visible , 2020 .

[17]  A. Stirling.  Knowing doing governing: realizing heterodyne democracies , 2016 .

[18]  N. Castree.  Environmental issues: relational ontologies and hybrid politics , 2003 .

[19]  Bruce Braun.  THE 2013 ANTIPODE RGS‐IBG LECTURE New Materialisms and Neoliberal Natures , 2015 .

[20]  U. Svedin,et al.  Stewardship, care and relational values , 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[21]  M. C. Diaw,et al.  Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services , 2018 .

[22]  H. Thompson.  The Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness: Its Importance for Critical and Creative Inquiry , 1997 .

[23]  G. Feola.  Societal transformation in response to global environmental change: A review of emerging concepts , 2015, Ambio.

[24]  Peeter Selg.  Two Faces of the “Relational Turn” , 2016, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[25]  Mustafa Emirbayer.  Manifesto for a Relational Sociology1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  H. Nelson,et al.  Ecosystem Services and Beyond: Using Multiple Metaphors to Understand Human-Environment Relationships , 2013 .

[27]  Nick Turnbull,et al.  Relational public administration: a synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches , 2019, Public Management Review.

[28]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Nature , 1960 .

[29]  M. Schlüter,et al.  Effects of development interventions on biocultural diversity: a case study from the Pamir Mountains , 2019, Agriculture and Human Values.

[30]  E. Sterling,et al.  Moving beyond the human–nature dichotomy through biocultural approaches : Including ecological well-being in resilience indicators , 2017 .

[31]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation , 2016 .

[32]  H. Briassoulis.  Response assemblages and their socioecological fit , 2017 .

[33]  M. Schlüter,et al.  Towards a Process Epistemology for the Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems , 2020, Environmental Values.

[34]  L. Pereira,et al.  Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches , 2020 .

[35]  S. Leeuw,et al.  The shift toward social-ecological systems perspectives: insights into the human-nature relationship , 2015 .

[36]  Steven A. Gray,et al.  Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales , 2017, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[37]  E. Pedersen,et al.  Recreational cultural ecosystem services: How do people describe the value? , 2017 .

[38]  J. Martin-Ortega,et al.  Quantifying relational values — why not? , 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[39]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Past management affects success of current joint forestry management institutions in Tajikistan , 2018, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[40]  Karen L. Martin,et al.  Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re‐search , 2003 .

[41]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  C. Meek,et al.  Resilience scientists as change-makers-Growing the middle ground between science and advocacy? , 2015 .

[43]  Piero Morseletto,et al.  Analysing the influence of visualisations in global environmental governance , 2017 .

[44]  T. Ingold.  The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[45]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective , 2015 .

[46]  S. Marston,et al.  Human geography without scale , 2005 .

[47]  J. Sala,et al.  Moving towards public policy-ready science: philosophical insights on the social-ecological systems perspective for conservation science , 2019, Ecosystems and People.

[48]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science , 1983 .

[49]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[50]  J. Law.  Actor-network theory and material semiotics , 2009 .

[51]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Toward a Science of Sustainability: Report from Toward a Science of Sustainability Conference; Airlie Center ~ Warrenton, Virginia , 2010 .

[52]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Keep it complex , 2010, Nature.

[53]  M. Stenseke.  Connecting ‘relational values’ and relational landscape approaches , 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[54]  Karen J. Esler,et al.  Socio-Environmental Systems (SES) Research: what have we learned and how can we use this information in future research programs , 2016 .

[55]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Evolution and structure of sustainability science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  B. Muraca.  Relational Values: A Whiteheadian Alternative for Environmental Philosophy and Global Environmental Justice , 2016 .

[57]  Jeremy Walker,et al.  Genealogies of resilience , 2011 .

[58]  K. Soini,et al.  Operationalising transformative sustainability science through place-based research: the role of researchers , 2019, Sustainability Science.

[59]  Evan D. G. Fraser,et al.  The research journey: travels across the idiomatic and axiomatic toward a better understanding of complexity , 2014 .

[60]  R. Norgaard.  Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. , 1994 .

[61]  F. Guattari,et al.  A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia , 1980 .

[62]  Karen Barad.  Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning , 2007 .

[63]  Mireille Navarrete,et al.  The resilience of family farms: Towards a relational approach , 2016 .

[64]  S. Sörlin,et al.  Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: On articulating values in urban nature , 2013 .

[65]  D. Haraway,et al.  A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century , 2013 .

[66]  Diana H. Coole,et al.  New materialisms : ontology, agency, and politics , 2010 .

[67]  J. Tambling.  How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics by N. Katherine Hayles (review) , 2001, Modern Language Review.

[68]  Andrew F. Johnson,et al.  The balance between concepts and complexity in ecology , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[69]  R. Panelli.  More-than-human social geographies: posthuman and other possibilities , 2010 .

[70]  David P. M. Lam,et al.  Research pathways to foster transformation: linking sustainability science and social-ecological systems research , 2020 .

[71]  K. Farrell.  Untrol: Post-Truth and the New Normal of Post-Normal Science , 2020 .

[72]  J. Hukkinen.  Model of the social–ecological system depends on model of the mind: Contrasting information-processing and embodied views of cognition , 2014 .

[73]  S. D. N. Cook,et al.  The Push and Pull of the World: How Experience Animates Practice. , 2011 .

[74]  B. D. Vries,et al.  Sustainability Science by Bert J. M. de Vries , 2012 .

[75]  L. van Kerkhoff,et al.  Beyond “linking knowledge and action”: towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions , 2019, Policy Studies.

[76]  Laklak Burarrwanga,et al.  Caring as Country: towards an ontology of co-becoming in natural resource management | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2013 .

[77]  J. Christensen,et al.  The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities , 2017 .

[78]  H. Thorén,et al.  Three perspectives on relational values of nature , 2019, Sustainability Science.

[79]  E. Sterling,et al.  Developing biocultural indicators for resource management , 2019, Conservation Science and Practice.

[80]  M. Hulme,et al.  Who speaks for the future of Earth?: how critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene , 2015 .

[81]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  From Planetary Boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space — How can the scales be bridged? , 2016 .

[82]  J. Fischer,et al.  Reconnecting with nature for sustainability , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[83]  Jane Bennett.  Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things , 2010 .

[84]  J. Dupré,et al.  Everything Flows : Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology , 2018 .

[85]  P. Balvanera,et al.  From local landscapes to international policy: contributions of the biocultural paradigm to global sustainability , 2019, Global Sustainability.

[86]  Anne Jerneck,et al.  At the nexus of problem-solving and critical research , 2018 .

[87]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems , 2007, Science.

[88]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition. , 1999 .

[89]  R. Kaaronen,et al.  Reframing Tacit Human–Nature Relations: An Inquiry into Process Philosophy and the Philosophy of Michael Polanyi , 2018 .

[90]  I. Darnhofer,et al.  A relational perspective on the dynamics of the organic sector in Austria, Italy, and France , 2019, Journal of Rural Studies.

[91]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[92]  Didier Debaise.  Nature as Event: The Lure of the Possible , 2017 .

[93]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space , 2005 .

[94]  E. Ostrom.  A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems , 2009, Science.

[95]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[96]  R. Stedman,et al.  Sense of Place, Fast and Slow: The Potential Contributions of Affordance Theory to Sense of Place , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[97]  Örjan Bodin,et al.  A social relational approach to natural resource governance , 2011 .

[98]  J. Rockström,et al.  Emergence of a global science–business initiative for ocean stewardship , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  D. Lang,et al.  Leverage points for sustainability transformation , 2017, Ambio.

[100]  S. Nelson.  Resilience and the neoliberal counter-revolution: from ecologies of control to production of the common , 2014 .

[101]  F. Dépelteau.  The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology , 2018 .

[102]  S. D. Noam Cook,et al.  Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present , 2012 .

[103]  J. Fischer,et al.  A leverage points perspective on sustainability , 2019, People and Nature.

[104]  C. Larrosa,et al.  Achieving the Promise of Integration in Social-Ecological Research: A Review and Prospectus , 2018 .

[105]  M. Schlüter,et al.  Adopting process-relational perspectives to tackle the challenges of social-ecological systems research , 2020 .

[106]  Sarah C. Klain,et al.  Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm , 2017, PloS one.

[107]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Earth Stewardship: science for action to sustain the human‐earth system , 2011 .

[108]  William J. McConnell,et al.  Top 40 questions in coupled human and natural systems (CHANS) research , 2017 .

[109]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[110]  C. Rosin,et al.  Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking , 2014 .

[111]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  An ecomodernist manifesto , 2015 .

[112]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Reconnecting to the Biosphere , 2011, AMBIO.

[113]  Val Plumwood,et al.  Feminism and the Mastery of Nature , 2019, Ideals and Ideologies.

[114]  S. Jackson,et al.  Reconceptualizing ecosystem services , 2015 .

[115]  Sarah Whatmore,et al.  Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces , 2002 .

[116]  E. Swyngedouw,et al.  Urban Political Ecology, Justice and the Politics of Scale , 2003 .

[117]  R. J. Foster,et al.  Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds , 2015 .

[118]  Elizabeth Barnes,et al.  Ontic Vagueness: A Guide for the Perplexed1 , 2010 .

[119]  M. Feldman,et al.  Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[120]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating Social–Ecological Systems: Contents , 2002 .

[121]  H. Briassoulis.  Why I fell for assemblages , 2017 .

[122]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[123]  M. Leach,et al.  Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? , 2012 .

[124]  David Weinbaum,et al.  Complexity and the Philosophy of Becoming , 2015 .

[125]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[126]  Y. Kajikawa,et al.  Sustainability science: the changing landscape of sustainability research , 2014, Sustainability Science.

[127]  Stefan Thurner,et al.  Adaptive self-organization of Bali’s ancient rice terraces , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[128]  Martin Jones.  Phase space: geography, relational thinking, and beyond , 2009 .

[129]  J. Law.  After Method: Mess in Social Science Research , 2004 .

[130]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[131]  Lorrae van Kerkhoff,et al.  Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach , 2014 .

[132]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Traps and Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Review , 2018 .

[133]  M. Evans,et al.  Expanding the role of social science in conservation through an engagement with philosophy, methodology, and methods , 2019, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[134]  C. Wamsler,et al.  Towards a relational paradigm in sustainability research, practice, and education , 2020, Ambio.

[135]  Jennifer J. Silver,et al.  The Dark Side of Transformation: Latent Risks in Contemporary Sustainability Discourse , 2018, Antipode.

[136]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Untangling the Environmentalist's Paradox: Why is Human Well-Being Increasing as Ecosystem Services Degrade? , 2010, BioScience.

[137]  U. Svedin,et al.  Stewardship as a boundary object for sustainability research: Linking care, knowledge and agency , 2018, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[138]  Helen Verran,et al.  Doing Indigenous Methodologies:: Toward a Practice of the “Careful Partial Participant , 2018 .

[139]  Carl Folke,et al.  Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability , 2017 .

[140]  N. Castree.  Geographies of nature in the making , 2002 .

[141]  H. Wagenaar,et al.  Introducing a practice perspective on monitoring for adaptive management , 2019, People and Nature.

[142]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  The SAGE handbook of process organization studies , 2016 .

[143]  Megan Meacham,et al.  The undisciplinary journey: early-career perspectives in sustainability science , 2017, Sustainability Science.

[144]  M. Schlüter,et al.  Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems: an analytical framework , 2019, Ecology and Society.

[145]  J. Lubchenco,et al.  Working together: A call for inclusive conservation , 2014, Nature.

[146]  H. Wittmer,et al.  Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being , 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[147]  R. Lejano.  Relationality and Social–Ecological Systems: Going Beyond or Behind Sustainability and Resilience , 2019, Sustainability.

[148]  Maja Schlüter,et al.  From nouns to verbs: How process ontologies enhance our understanding of social‐ecological systems understood as complex adaptive systems , 2020, People and Nature.

[149]  C. Raymond,et al.  An embodied perspective on the co-production of cultural ecosystem services: toward embodied ecosystems , 2018 .

[150]  X. Bai,et al.  Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures , 2018, Global Sustainability.

[151]  Ian Scoones,et al.  New Ecology and the Social Sciences: What Prospects for a Fruitful Engagement? , 1999 .

[152]  V. Toledo,et al.  Sustainability Science: A Paradigm in Crisis? , 2020, Sustainability.

[153]  L. Pellizzoni.  Ontological Politics in a Disposable World: The New Mastery of Nature , 2015 .

[154]  S. Clegg,et al.  Managing the Anthropocene: Relational Agency and Power to Respect Planetary Boundaries , 2019, Organization & Environment.

[155]  Robert W. Kates,et al.  Readings in Sustainability Science and Technology , 2010 .

[156]  H. Daly.  A.N. Whitehead’s Fallacy of Misplaced Concreteness: Examples from Economics , 1987 .

[157]  Terry Hartig,et al.  Nature experience in transactional perspective , 1993 .

[158]  M. Tironi,et al.  Healing, knowing, enduring: Care and politics in damaged worlds , 2017 .

[159]  Steven M. Alexander,et al.  Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future , 2019, Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site].

[160]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications , 2012, Environment and Development Economics.

[161]  W. J. Boonstra,et al.  Dwelling in the biosphere: exploring an embodied human–environment connection in resilience thinking , 2016, Sustainability Science.

[162]  Unai Pascual,et al.  Editorial overview: Relational values: what are they, and what’s the fuss about? , 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.

[163]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[164]  Stephen Woroniecki.  Enabling Environments? Examining Social Co-Benefits of Ecosystem-Based Adaptation to Climate Change in Sri Lanka , 2019, Sustainability.

[165]  Sarah K. Mincey,et al.  Putting the "E" in SES: unpacking the ecology in the Ostrom social-ecological system framework , 2015 .

[166]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[167]  N. Kabeer.  Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment , 1999 .

[168]  B. Muraca.  The Map of Moral Significance: A New Axiological Matrix for Environmental Ethics , 2011 .