Lidar Aboveground Vegetation Biomass Estimates in Shrublands: Prediction, Uncertainties and Application to Coarser Scales

Our study objectives were to model the aboveground biomass in a xeric shrub-steppe landscape with airborne light detection and ranging (Lidar) and explore the uncertainty associated with the models we created. We incorporated vegetation vertical structure information obtained from Lidar with ground-measured biomass data, allowing us to scale shrub biomass from small field sites (1 m subplots and 1 ha plots) to a larger landscape. A series of airborne Lidar-derived vegetation metrics were trained and linked with the field-measured biomass in Random Forests (RF) regression models. A Stepwise Multiple Regression (SMR) model was also explored as a comparison. Our results demonstrated that the important predictors from Lidar-derived metrics had a strong correlation with field-measured biomass in the RF regression models with a pseudo R2 of 0.76 and RMSE of 125 g/m2 for shrub biomass and a pseudo R2 of 0.74 and RMSE of 141 g/m2 for total biomass, and a weak correlation with field-measured herbaceous biomass. The SMR results were similar but slightly better than RF, explaining 77–79% of the variance, with RMSE ranging from 120 to 129 g/m2 for shrub and total biomass, respectively. We further explored the computational efficiency and relative accuracies of using point cloud and raster Lidar metrics at different resolutions (1 m to 1 ha). Metrics derived from the Lidar point cloud processing led to improved biomass estimates at nearly all resolutions in comparison to raster-derived Lidar metrics. Only at 1 m were the results from the point cloud and raster products nearly equivalent. The best Lidar prediction models of biomass at the plot-level (1 ha) were achieved when Lidar metrics were derived from an average of fine resolution (1 m) metrics to minimize boundary effects and to smooth variability. Overall, both RF and SMR methods explained more than 74% of the variance in biomass, with the most important Lidar variables being associated with vegetation structure and statistical measures of this structure (e.g., standard deviation of height was a strong predictor of biomass). Using our model results, we developed spatially-explicit Lidar estimates of total and shrub biomass across our study site in the Great Basin, U.S.A., for monitoring and planning in this imperiled ecosystem.

[1]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Scaling up: linking field data and remote sensing with a hierarchical model , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Yi Lin,et al.  Tree Height Growth Measurement with Single-Scan Airborne, Static Terrestrial and Mobile Laser Scanning , 2012, Sensors.

[3]  Dimitri Lague,et al.  Analyzing High Resolution Topography for Advancing the Understanding of Mass and Energy Transfer Through Landscapes: A Review , 2015 .

[4]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[5]  Haiyan Guan,et al.  RANDOM FORESTS-BASED FEATURE SELECTION FOR LAND-USE CLASSIFICATION USING LIDAR DATA AND ORTHOIMAGERY , 2012 .

[6]  J. Estornella.  ESTIMATION OF BIOMASS AND VOLUME OF SHRUB VEGETATION USING LiDAR AND SPECTRAL DATA IN A MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT , 2015 .

[7]  Alexander Brenning,et al.  Quantifying dwarf shrub biomass in an arid environment: comparing empirical methods in a high dimensional setting , 2015 .

[8]  José Cristóbal Riquelme Santos,et al.  A Comparative Study between Two Regression Methods on LiDAR Data: A Case Study , 2011, HAIS.

[9]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[10]  Jay E. Anderson,et al.  LANDSCAPE‐SCALE CHANGES IN PLANT SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND BIODIVERSITY OF A SAGEBRUSH STEPPE OVER 45 YEARS , 2001 .

[11]  Patrick E. Clark,et al.  Estimating Sagebrush Biomass Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2014 .

[12]  Nancy F. Glenn,et al.  Quantifying and predicitng fuels and the effects of reduction treatments along successional and invasion gradients in sagebrush habitats , 2015 .

[13]  Jessica J. Mitchell,et al.  Errors in LiDAR-derived shrub height and crown area on sloped terrain , 2011 .

[14]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics , 2010 .

[15]  A. Prasad,et al.  Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction , 2006, Ecosystems.

[16]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[17]  E. Bork,et al.  Integrating LIDAR data and multispectral imagery for enhanced classification of rangeland vegetation: A meta analysis , 2007 .

[18]  R. B. Waite,et al.  The application of visual estimation procedures for monitoring pasture yield and composition in exclosures and small plots , 1994 .

[19]  Kenneth B. Pierce,et al.  Quantification of live aboveground forest biomass dynamics with Landsat time-series and field inventory data: A comparison of empirical modeling approaches , 2010 .

[20]  Yasuyuki Ishii,et al.  Potential forage and biomass production of newly introduced varieties of leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit.) in Thailand , 2011 .

[21]  I. Burke,et al.  Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests , 2005 .

[22]  Stuart P. Hardegree,et al.  Lidar‐derived estimate and uncertainty of carbon sink in successional phases of woody encroachment , 2013 .

[23]  Peter D. Stahl,et al.  Carbon accumulation and storage in semi-arid sagebrush steppe: Effects of long-term grazing exclusion , 2008 .

[24]  Nicanor Z. Saliendra,et al.  Bowen ratio and closed chamber carbon dioxide flux measurements over sagebrush steppe vegetation , 2001 .

[25]  Jeffrey L. Beck,et al.  Land Uses, Fire, and Invasion: Exotic Annual Bromus and Human Dimensions , 2016 .

[26]  Stuart P. Hardegree,et al.  Vegetation and slope effects on accuracy of a LiDAR-derived DEM in the sagebrush steppe , 2011 .

[27]  Thomas H. Painter,et al.  The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo , 2016 .

[28]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[29]  Jungho Im,et al.  Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches , 2012 .

[30]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  The roles of nearest neighbor methods in imputing missing data in forest inventory and monitoring databases , 2009 .

[31]  G. Tutz,et al.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[32]  W. K. Lauenroth,et al.  Small rainfall events: An ecological role in semiarid regions , 1982, Oecologia.

[33]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  Modeling the Potential Distribution of Pine Forests Susceptible to Sirex Noctilio Infestations in Mpumalanga, South Africa , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[34]  J. Eitel,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass and leaf area of low-stature Arctic shrubs with terrestrial LiDAR , 2015 .

[35]  Alain Baccini,et al.  yaImpute: An R Package for kNN Imputation , 2007 .

[36]  Dirk Van den Poel,et al.  FACULTEIT ECONOMIE , 2007 .

[37]  Nancy F. Glenn,et al.  Landsat 8 and ICESat-2: Performance and potential synergies for quantifying dryland ecosystem vegetation cover and biomass , 2016 .

[38]  Megan K. Creutzburg,et al.  Climate Change and Land Management in the Rangelands of Central Oregon , 2014, Environmental Management.

[39]  E. Næsset,et al.  Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data , 2010 .

[40]  Kyle E. Anderson,et al.  Vegetation measurements in sagebrush steppe using terrestrial laser scanning , 2014 .

[41]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  Aggregating pixel-level basal area predictions derived from LiDAR data to industrial forest stands in North-Central Idaho , 2008 .

[42]  Michael G. Barbour,et al.  North American Terrestrial Vegetation. , 1989 .

[43]  Elise Pendall,et al.  Testing sagebrush allometric relationships across three fire chronosequences in Wyoming, USA , 2008 .

[44]  Jessica J. Mitchell,et al.  Small-footprint Lidar Estimations of Sagebrush Canopy Characteristics , 2011 .

[45]  Rupesh Shrestha,et al.  Single and Multi-Date Landsat Classifications of Basalt to Support Soil Survey Efforts , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[46]  Jacob T. Mundt,et al.  Mapping Sagebrush Distribution Using Fusion of Hyperspectral and Lidar Classifications , 2006 .

[47]  S. Ustin,et al.  Estimation of shrub height for fuel-type mapping combining airborne LiDAR and simultaneous color infrared ortho imaging , 2007 .

[48]  Keirith A. Snyder,et al.  Carbon pools in an arid shrubland in Chile under natural and afforested conditions , 2011 .

[49]  M. Cho,et al.  Classification of savanna tree species, in the Greater Kruger National Park region, by integrating hyperspectral and LiDAR data in a Random Forest data mining environment , 2012 .

[50]  Robert P Freckleton,et al.  Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[51]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[52]  Rupesh Shrestha,et al.  Aboveground Biomass Estimates of Sagebrush Using Terrestrial and Airborne LiDAR Data in a Dryland Ecosystem , 2015 .

[53]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Assessing general relationships between aboveground biomass and vegetation structure parameters for improved carbon estimate from lidar remote sensing , 2009 .

[54]  Robert S. Arkle,et al.  Performance of Quantitative Vegetation Sampling Methods Across Gradients of Cover in Great Basin Plant Communities , 2013 .

[55]  Rupesh Shrestha,et al.  Combining airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data across local sites for upscaling shrubland structural information: lessons for HyspIRI. , 2015 .

[56]  J. Eitel,et al.  High-resolution mapping of aboveground shrub biomass in Arctic tundra using airborne lidar and imagery , 2016 .

[57]  Cristina Vega-García,et al.  Assessing Post-Fire Regeneration in a Mediterranean Mixed Forest Using Lidar Data and Artificial Neural Networks , 2013 .

[58]  Patrick E. Clark,et al.  Aboveground Total and Green Biomass of Dryland Shrub Derived from Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2014 .

[59]  Ahmed Shaker,et al.  Raster Vs. Point Cloud LiDAR Data Classification , 2014 .

[60]  Anthony M. Filippi,et al.  Assessment of available rangeland woody plant biomass with a terrestrial lidar system. , 2012 .

[61]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Characteristics of Sagebrush Habitats and Limitations to Long-Term Conservation , 2011 .

[62]  Guang Zheng,et al.  Retrieval of Effective Leaf Area Index in Heterogeneous Forests With Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[63]  N. Glenn,et al.  LiDAR measurement of sagebrush steppe vegetation heights , 2006 .

[64]  R. Valentini,et al.  Above ground biomass estimation in an African tropical forest with lidar and hyperspectral data , 2014 .

[65]  Patrick E. Clark,et al.  Point Sampling to Stratify Biomass Variability in Sagebrush Steppe Vegetation , 2008 .

[66]  Edward W. Bork,et al.  Characterization of diverse plant communities in Aspen Parkland rangeland using LiDAR data , 2007 .

[67]  Daniel W. Uresk,et al.  Sampling big sagebrush for phytomass. , 1977 .

[68]  James K. Brown.  Fuel and Fire Behavior Prediction in Big Sagebrush , 2018 .

[69]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[70]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Combining satellite lidar, airborne lidar, and ground plots to estimate the amount and distribution of aboveground biomass in the boreal forest of North America1 , 2015 .