The Weighted Gini-Simpson Index: Revitalizing an Old Index of Biodiversity

The distribution of biodiversity at multiple sites of a region has been traditionally investigated through the additive partitioning of the regional biodiversity into the average within-site biodiversity and the biodiversity among sites. The standard additive partitioning of diversity requires the use of a measure of diversity, which is a concave function of the relative abundance of species, such as the Gini-Simpson index, for instance. Recently, it was noticed that the widely used Gini-Simpson index does not behave well when the number of species is very large. The objective of this paper is to show that the new weighted Gini-Simpson index preserves the qualities of the classic Gini-Simpson index and behaves very well when the number of species is large. The weights allow us to take into account the abundance of species, the phylogenetic distance between species, and the conservation values of species. This measure may also be generalized to pairs of species and, unlike Rao’s index, this measure proves to be a concave function of the joint distribution of the relative abundance of species, being suitable for use in the additive partitioning of biodiversity. The weighted Gini-Simpson index may be easily transformed for use in the multiplicative partitioning of biodiversity as well.

[1]  Silviu Guiasu,et al.  The Rich-Gini-Simpson quadratic index of biodiversity , 2010 .

[2]  Silviu Guiasu,et al.  A quantitative-qualitative measure of information in cybernetic systems (Corresp.) , 1968, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  A. Chao,et al.  Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses , 2010 .

[4]  M. Hill.  Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .

[5]  S. Guiasu,et al.  The weighted quadratic index of biodiversity for pairs of species: a generalization of Rao’s index , 2011 .

[6]  R. Macarthur.  PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1965 .

[7]  L. Jost.  Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. , 2007, Ecology.

[8]  L. Jost.  Entropy and diversity , 2006 .

[9]  Sönke Hoffmann,et al.  Is there a “true” diversity? , 2008 .

[10]  R. Lande.  Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities , 1996 .

[11]  Ludwig Boltzmann,et al.  Vorlesungen über Gastheorie , 2009 .

[12]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[13]  C. Gini.  Variabilita e Mutabilita. , 1913 .

[14]  A. Chao,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity measures based on Hill numbers , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  A. Rényi.  On Measures of Entropy and Information , 1961 .

[16]  Carlo Ricotta,et al.  Through the Jungle of Biological Diversity , 2005, Acta biotheoretica.

[17]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[18]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[19]  Calyampudi R. Rao.  Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach☆ , 1982 .

[20]  T. O. Crist,et al.  The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea , 2002 .

[21]  E. C. Pielou.  Shannon's Formula as a Measure of Specific Diversity: Its Use and Misuse , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[22]  L. Jost.  Mismeasuring biological diversity: : Response to Hoffmann and Hoffmann (2008) , 2009 .

[23]  R. Cornel.  Diversity Measures and Coarse-graining in Data Analysis with an Application Involving Plant Species on the Galápagos Islands , 2013 .

[24]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[25]  C. Ricotta,et al.  Diversity partitioning of Rao's quadratic entropy. , 2009, Theoretical population biology.

[26]  Silviu Guiasu,et al.  New Measures for Comparing the Species Diversity Found in Two or More Habitats , 2010, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..