Quantitative PCR versus metagenomics for monitoring antibiotic resistance genes: balancing high sensitivity and broad coverage

Abstract The widespread occurrence of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance within humans, animals, and environment motivates the development of sensitive and accurate detection and quantification methods. Metagenomics and quantitative PCR (qPCR) are amongst the most used approaches. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of these methods to screen antibiotic resistance genes in animal faecal, wastewater, and water samples. Water and wastewater samples were from hospital effluent, different treatment stages of two treatment plants, and of the receiving river at the discharge point. The animal samples were from pig and chicken faeces. Antibiotic resistance gene coverage, sensitivity, and usefulness of the quantitative information were analyzed and discussed. While both methods were able to distinguish the resistome profiles and detect gradient stepwise mixtures of pig and chicken faeces, qPCR presented higher sensitivity for the detection of a few antibiotic resistance genes in water/wastewater. In addition, the comparison of predicted and observed antibiotic resistance gene quantifications unveiled the higher accuracy of qPCR. Metagenomics analyses, while less sensitive, provided a markedly higher coverage of antibiotic resistance genes compared to qPCR. The complementarity of both methods and the importance of selecting the best method according to the study purpose are discussed.

[1]  C. Manaia,et al.  The balance between treatment efficiency and receptor quality determines wastewater impacts on the dissemination of antibiotic resistance. , 2022, Journal of hazardous materials.

[2]  J. Cole,et al.  Surveillance and prevalence of antimicrobial resistant bacteria from public settings within urban built environments: Challenges and opportunities for hygiene and infection control , 2021, Environment International.

[3]  M. Salit,et al.  The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  M. V. Riquelme,et al.  Comparison of Culture- and Quantitative PCR-Based Indicators of Antibiotic Resistance in Wastewater, Recycled Water, and Tap Water , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  Charmaine Ng,et al.  Removal of antibiotic residues, antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in municipal wastewater by membrane bioreactor systems. , 2018, Water research.

[6]  J. Tamames,et al.  Bacterial lineages putatively associated with the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in a full-scale urban wastewater treatment plant. , 2018, Environment international.

[7]  Ole Lund,et al.  Rapid and precise alignment of raw reads against redundant databases with KMA , 2018, BMC Bioinformatics.

[8]  O. Lund,et al.  Abundance and diversity of the faecal resistome in slaughter pigs and broilers in nine European countries , 2018, Nature Microbiology.

[9]  Tong Zhang,et al.  Tracking antibiotic resistance gene pollution from different sources using machine-learning classification , 2018, Microbiome.

[10]  C. Manaia,et al.  Inter-laboratory calibration of quantitative analyses of antibiotic resistance genes , 2018 .

[11]  F. Aarestrup,et al.  A sampling and metagenomic sequencing-based methodology for monitoring antimicrobial resistance in swine herds , 2017, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[12]  S. Kennedy,et al.  In-depth resistome analysis by targeted metagenomics , 2017, bioRxiv.

[13]  Despo Fatta-Kassinos,et al.  Antibiotic resistance in urban aquatic environments: can it be controlled? , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[14]  Brian Bushnell,et al.  BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner , 2014 .

[15]  David R. Kelley,et al.  Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[16]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.