The influence of age in usability testing.

The effects of age in usability testing were examined in an experiment. Sixty users from two age groups (M = 23.0 yrs, M = 58.1 yrs) operated two technical devices (keyboard-based and touchscreen-based smartphones). In addition to various performance measures (e.g. task completion time, task completion rate), several subjective measures were taken (e.g. perceived usability, affect, and workload). The results showed better performance scores for younger adults than older adults for task completion time. For older adult users there was a mismatch between usability ratings and task completion time but not between usability ratings and task completion rate. Age-related differences in the importance of speed and accuracy in task completion point to the need to consider more strongly the factor user age in usability research and practice.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Measuring usability: preference vs. performance , 1994, CACM.

[2]  William L. Smith,et al.  Age as a moderator of attitude towards technology in the workplace: work motivation and overall job satisfaction , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[4]  Jennifer L. Dyck,et al.  Age Differences in Computer Anxiety: The Role of Computer Experience, Gender and Education , 1994 .

[5]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures , 2007, CHI.

[6]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Computer anxiety: A cross-cultural comparison of university students in ten countries , 1995 .

[7]  Karl H.E. Kroemer,et al.  Ergonomics: How to Design for Ease and Efficiency , 1993 .

[8]  Krishna Bharat,et al.  Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons , 1997, CHI.

[9]  Jean Claude Marquié,et al.  The effect of motor difficulty on the acquisition of a computer task: a comparison between young and older adults , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Neil Charness,et al.  Input devices for web browsing: age and hand effects , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[11]  P A Hancock,et al.  Influence of task demand characteristics on workload and performance. , 1995, The International journal of aviation psychology.

[12]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  A systematic approach to the development of research-based web design guidelines for older people , 2007, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[13]  T. Salthouse.  Effects of age and skill in typing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  P. Rabbitt.  How old and young subjects monitor and control responses for accuracy and speed , 1979 .

[15]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[16]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[17]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  The role of spatial abilities and age in performance in an auditory computer navigation task , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  A. Welford.  Motivation, Capacity, Learning and Age , 1976, International journal of aging & human development.

[19]  Jürgen S. Sauer,et al.  Expressive and classical aesthetics: two distinct concepts with highly similar effect patterns in user–artefact interaction , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[20]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Carmen Bruder,et al.  Adaptive training interfaces for less-experienced, elderly users of electronic devices , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[23]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Effect of age and Parkinson's disease on cursor positioning using a mouse , 2005, Assets '05.

[24]  David Watson,et al.  Positive and Negative Affect Schedule , 2011 .

[25]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Movement specification time with age. , 1987, Experimental Aging Research.

[26]  G. Smith,et al.  Slowness and age: speed-accuracy mechanisms. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[27]  Yifat Ben-David Kolikant,et al.  Digital natives, better learners? Students' beliefs about how the Internet influenced their ability to learn , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[29]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[31]  Vicki L. Hanson.  Age and web access: the next generation , 2009, W4A.

[32]  H Emslie,et al.  Text entry on handheld computers by older users , 2000, Ergonomics.

[33]  Silvia Heinz,et al.  Cognitive Load in eCommerce Applications - Measurement and Effects on User Satisfaction , 2009, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[35]  N. O'Connor,et al.  Touch Screens for the Older User , 2012 .

[36]  Brenda Scott,et al.  Designing Touch Screen Numeric Keypads: Effects of Finger Size, Key Size, and Key Spacing , 1997 .

[37]  Karel A. Brookhuis,et al.  On the assessment of (mental) workload and other subjective qualifications , 2002, Ergonomics.

[38]  U. Kanning,et al.  NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae (NEO-FFI) , 2009 .

[39]  Gastón Ares,et al.  COMPARING OLDER AND YOUNGER USERS' PERCEPTIONS OF MOBILE PHONES AND WATCHES USING CATA QUESTIONS AND PREFERENCE MAPPING ON THE DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS , 2011 .

[40]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  The Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff in the Elderly Brain: A Structural Model-Based Approach , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Thüring,et al.  Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction , 2007 .

[42]  G. Matthews.  Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences , 2000 .

[43]  H. M. Sayers,et al.  Desktop virtual environments: a study of navigation and age , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[44]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  A blessing, not a curse: Experimental evidence for beneficial effects of visual aesthetics on performance , 2009, Ergonomics.

[45]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  C. Wickens,et al.  Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload , 1988 .

[47]  J. Birren,et al.  Aging and speed of behavior: possible consequences for psychological functioning. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  E. A. Bosman.  Age-related differences in the motoric aspects of transcription typing skill. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[49]  Liana M. Kiff,et al.  Touch Screen User Interfaces for Older Adults: Button Size and Spacing , 2007, HCI.

[50]  P. Borkenau,et al.  NEO-FFI : NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar nach Costa und McCrae, Manual , 2008 .

[51]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[52]  G. Jay,et al.  Influence of direct computer experience on older adults' attitudes toward computers. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[53]  Morten Hertzum,et al.  How Age Affects Pointing With Mouse and Touchpad: A Comparison of Young, Adult, and Elderly Users , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[54]  Richard Pak,et al.  Age-Sensitive Design of Online Health Information: Comparative Usability Study , 2009, Journal of medical Internet research.

[55]  Susan Gardner,et al.  What Students Want: Generation Y and the Changing Function of the Academic Library , 2005 .

[56]  Sue Bennett,et al.  The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[57]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  The performance of touch screen soft buttons , 2009, CHI.

[58]  M. Mills,et al.  Usability of Health Web Sites for Older Adults: A Preliminary Study , 2004, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[59]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Web accessibility for older adults: effects of line spacing and text justification on reading web pages , 2013, ASSETS.

[60]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[61]  Jaclyn R. Schrier.  Reducing Stress Associated with Participating in a Usability Test , 1992 .

[62]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of usability evaluation methods for children , 2001 .

[63]  Sara J. Czaja,et al.  The impact of aging on access to technology , 2005, ASAC.

[64]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[65]  W J Horrey,et al.  Dissociation between driving performance and drivers' subjective estimates of performance and workload in dual-task conditions. , 2009, Journal of safety research.

[66]  Carl-Walter Kohlmann,et al.  Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS). , 1996 .

[67]  R. William Soukoreff,et al.  Text entry for mobile computing: models and methods , 2002 .

[68]  S. Anderson,et al.  Technophobia and Personality Subtypes in a Sample of South African University Students , 2000 .

[69]  Andreas Sonderegger,et al.  The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures , 2009, Ergonomics.

[70]  C D Wickens,et al.  Causes of dissociation between subjective workload measures and performance ; Caveats for the use of subjective assessments. , 1986, Applied ergonomics.

[71]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  Touchscreen Interfaces for Alphanumeric Data Entry , 1992 .

[72]  Sundaram Narayanan,et al.  Modeling web-based information seeking by users who are blind , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[73]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[74]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Technology and aging , 2005 .

[75]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[76]  Sang D. Choi,et al.  Study of Computer Input Devices and Older Users , 2009 .

[77]  Dongjin Kim,et al.  Usability evaluation of numeric entry tasks on keypad type and age , 2010 .

[78]  Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft,et al.  Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft , 2012 .

[79]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated? , 2000, CHI.

[80]  Martin Schedlbauer.  Effects of Key Size and Spacing on the Completion Time and Accuracy of Input Tasks on Soft Keypads Using Trackball and Touch Input , 2007 .

[81]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[82]  C Sutter,et al.  Notebook input devices put to the age test: the usability of trackpoint and touchpad for middle-aged adults , 2007, Ergonomics.

[83]  Patrick W. Jordan,et al.  An Introduction to Usability , 1998 .

[84]  Herbert Colle,et al.  Standing at a kiosk: Effects of key size and spacing on touch screen numeric keypad performance and user preference , 2004, Ergonomics.

[85]  Armando Barreto,et al.  Low vision: the role of visual acuity in the efficiency of cursor movement , 2000, Assets '00.

[86]  Stephen J. Morrissey,et al.  Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2008 .

[87]  C. Wickens.  Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[88]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Adult age and the speed-accuracy trade-off. , 1979, Ergonomics.