Examining non-representation in engineering notations: Empirical evidence for the ontological incomp

Abstract The assumption that functionally rational notations can represent organisational spaces is central to engineering diagrammatical approaches in the delivery of advanced technology. This is reflected in a approach to notations which assumes objective, rationalistic ontologies. This form of rationalism in the modelling approach undermines notions of social context and social impact but, as such, has received little attention in the engineering literature to date. This paper opens the debate on research into notations and their relationship to sound method, suggesting that researchers need to rethink the ways in which the world is represented in engineering documentation, especially Requirements Engineering and Business Process Re-Engineering (BPRE). Empirical data from 9 companies and 48 people involved in manufacturing systems projects is presented which provides evidence for this position.

[1]  Larry Stapleton From Information Systems in Social Settings To Information Systems as Social Settings , 2000 .

[2]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  M.J. Bickerton,et al.  The classification of requirements engineering methods , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[4]  J. March Ambiguity and accounting: The elusive link between information and decision making☆ , 1987 .

[5]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[6]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Rationality concepts in information system development methodologies , 1991 .

[7]  Jiang De Object-Oriented Methodology , 2003 .

[8]  S. Hilgartner,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[11]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[12]  E. Craig,et al.  The Oxford dictionary of philosophy , 2008 .

[13]  Joseph A. Goguen,et al.  Techniques for requirements elicitation , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[14]  Joseph A. Goguen,et al.  Social issues in requirements engineering , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[15]  Larry Stapleton,et al.  Information Systems Development (ISD) in Complex Settings as Interlocking Spirals of Sense-Making , 1999 .

[16]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.