Rethinking Representation

Along with the traditional “promissory” form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here “anticipatory,” “gyroscopic,” and “surrogate” representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.

[1]  Edmund F. Burke.  The works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke , 1887 .

[2]  C. Friedrich.  Constitutional Government and Politics , 1938 .

[3]  H. Pitkin.  The Concept of Representation , 1969 .

[4]  Carl J. Friedrich,et al.  Man and His Government , 1968 .

[5]  M. Crenson,et al.  The Un-Politics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decisionmaking in the Cities , 1972 .

[6]  W. Connolly.  On 'Interests' in Politics , 1972 .

[7]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests. , 1973 .

[8]  John W. Kingdon.  Congressmen's voting decisions , 1973 .

[9]  Michael Boss.  Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .

[10]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Representatives, roll calls, and constituencies , 1974 .

[11]  Jack H. Nagel,et al.  The Descriptive Analysis of Power , 1975 .

[12]  M. Fiorina.  An Outline for a Model of Party Choice , 1977 .

[13]  Robert Weissberg.  Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[14]  Richard F. Fenno.  Home Style : House Members in Their Districts , 1978 .

[15]  Benjamin I. Page,et al.  Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. , 1979 .

[16]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Beyond Adversary Democracy , 1980 .

[17]  Ronald Rogowski.  Representation in Political Theory and in Law , 1981, Ethics.

[18]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[19]  Catastrophic health insurance. , 1983, National journal.

[20]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Reason and the rationalization of society , 1984 .

[21]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[22]  J. Ferejohn.  Incumbent performance and electoral control , 1986 .

[23]  John R. Lott.  Political cheating , 1987 .

[24]  N. Schwartz.  The Blue Guitar: Political Representation and Community , 1988 .

[25]  P. J. Conover.  The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking , 1988, British Journal of Political Science.

[26]  J. Habermas.  Justice and Solidarity : on the Discussion Concerning Stage 6 in Hermeneutics in Ethics and Social Theory. , 1989 .

[27]  Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory , 1989 .

[28]  R. Bernstein.  Elections, Representation, and Congressional Voting Behavior: The Myth of Constituency Control , 1989 .

[29]  D. King,et al.  Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[30]  R. Arnold.  The logic of congressional action , 1990 .

[31]  Thomas E. Wartenberg.  The Forms of Power: From Domination to Transformation , 1990 .

[32]  Combining deliberation and fair representation in community health decisions. , 1992, University of Pennsylvania law review.

[33]  Joel Rogers,et al.  Secondary Associations and Democratic Governance , 1992 .

[34]  C. Swain.  Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress , 1993 .

[35]  Warren E. Miller,et al.  Constituency Influence in Congress , 1963, American Political Science Review.

[36]  B. Honig.  Political Theory And The Displacement Of Politics , 1993 .

[37]  A. Greif.  Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Traders' Coalition , 1993 .

[38]  W. Bianco.  Trust: Representatives and Constituents , 1994 .

[39]  Sue Thomas.  How Women Legislate , 1994 .

[40]  J. Knight,et al.  Aggregation and Deliberation: On the Possibility of Democratic Legitimacy , 1994 .

[41]  W. B. Gallie.  Essentially Contested Concepts , 1994, The Importance of Language.

[42]  蔡森昌.  饒斯對功效主義（Utilitarianism）的批評 , 1994 .

[43]  Alain Boyer.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[44]  Anne Phillips,et al.  The Politics of Presence , 1995 .

[45]  Benjamin I. Page.  Who Deliberates?: Mass Media in Modern Democracy , 1996 .

[46]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[47]  Melissa S. Williams.  Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation , 1998 .

[48]  J. Willis.  The voice of the people. , 1998, Nursing times.

[49]  Dennis Davis,et al.  Democracy and deliberation , 1999 .

[50]  Daniel H. Frank.  I. Liberty , 1999, Love's Body, Reissue of 1966 edition.

[51]  G. Brennan,et al.  On Political Representation , 1999, British Journal of Political Science.

[52]  J. Fearon.  Democracy, Accountability, and Representation: Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance , 1999 .

[53]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes" , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[54]  Alan Hamlin,et al.  Democratic devices and desires , 2000 .

[55]  Robert Y. Shapiro,et al.  Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness , 2000 .

[56]  Hermann Schmitt,et al.  Dynamic Representation , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[57]  Christian Rostboll,et al.  On Deliberative Democracy , 2001 .

[58]  C. Tilly.  Democracy , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[59]  Ralph Hambrick,et al.  Rethinking Democratic Accountability , 2002 .

[60]  B. Cruikshank.  Inclusion and democracy. , 2002 .

[61]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[62]  김기경.  Accountability , 2019, Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.