Countermovement strategy changes with vertical jump height to accommodate feasible force constraints.

In this study, we developed a curve-fit model of countermovement dynamics and examined whether the characteristics of a countermovement jump can be quantified using the model parameter and its scaling; we expected that the model-based analysis would facilitate an understanding of the basic mechanisms of force reduction and propulsion with a simplified framework of the center of mass (CoM) mechanics. Ten healthy young subjects jumped straight up to five different levels ranging from approximately 10% to 35% of their body heights. The kinematic and kinetic data on the CoM were measured using a force plate system synchronized with motion capture cameras. All subjects generated larger vertical forces compared with their body weights from the countermovement and sufficiently lowered their CoM position to support the work performed by push-off as the vertical elevations became more challenging. The model simulation reasonably reproduced the trajectories of vertical force during the countermovement, and the model parameters were replaced by linear and polynomial regression functions in terms of the vertical jump height. Gradual scaling trends of the individual model parameters were observed as a function of the vertical jump height with different degrees of scaling, depending on the subject. The results imply that the subjects may be aware of the jumping dynamics when subjected to various vertical jump heights and may select their countermovement strategies to effectively accommodate biomechanical constraints, i.e., limited force generation for the standing vertical jump.

[1]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Gerrit Jan van Ingen Schenau,et al.  Does Elastic Energy Enhance Work and Efficiency in the Stretch-Shortening Cycle? , 1997 .

[3]  Sukyung Park,et al.  Perturbation-dependent selection of postural feedback gain and its scaling. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Akinori Nagano,et al.  The effects of ankle restriction on the multijoint coordination of vertical jumping. , 2013, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[5]  John H Challis,et al.  The influence of squat depth on maximal vertical jump performance , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  M F Bobbert,et al.  Control of maximal and submaximal vertical jumps. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  M. Pandy,et al.  Storage and utilization of elastic strain energy during jumping. , 1993, Journal of Biomechanics.

[8]  Adrian Lees,et al.  Effect of Forward Trunk Inclination on Joint Power Output in Vertical Jumping , 2008, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  D. Lovell,et al.  The Role of Rate of Force Development on Vertical Jump Performance , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[10]  P. Komi Stretch-shortening cycle: a powerful model to study normal and fatigued muscle. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. Kuo,et al.  Mechanical Work as an Indirect Measure of Subjective Costs Influencing Human Movement , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  G. Grimby,et al.  Use of a Kin-Com dynamometer to study the stretch-shortening cycle during plantar flexion , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[13]  Sukyung Park,et al.  Leg stiffness increases with speed to modulate gait frequency and propulsion energy. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  A. V. van Soest,et al.  Why is countermovement jump height greater than squat jump height? , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[15]  D. De Clercq,et al.  The energetics and benefit of an arm swing in submaximal and maximal vertical jump performance , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  F. Horak,et al.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.