Auto-Mutual Information Function for Predicting Pain Responses in EEG Signals during Sedation

The level of sedation in patients undergoing medical procedures evolves continuously, such as the effect of the anesthetic and analgesic agents is counteracted by pain stimuli. The monitors of depth of anesthesia, based on the analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), have been progressively introduced into the daily practice to provide additional information about the state of the patient. However, the quantification of analgesia still remains an open problem. The purpose of this work was to analyze the capability of prediction of nociceptive responses based on the auto-mutual information function (AMIF). AMIF measures were calculated on EEG signal in order to predict the presence or absence of the nociceptive responses to endoscopy tube insertion during sedation in endoscopy procedure. Values of prediction probability of Pk above 0.80 and percentages of sensitivity and specificity above 70% and 70% respectively were achieved combining AMIF with power spectral density and concentrations of remifentanil.

[1]  Tarmo Lipping,et al.  Comparison of entropy and complexity measures for the assessment of depth of sedation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  I Korhonen,et al.  Novel multiparameter approach for measurement of nociception at skin incision during general anaesthesia. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[3]  J. De Jonckheere,et al.  Validation of a graphic measurement of heart rate variability to assess analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  H. Storm Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[5]  J. Bruhn,et al.  Pharmacodynamic Interaction between Propofol and Remifentanil Regarding Hypnosis, Tolerance of Laryngoscopy, Bispectral Index, and Electroencephalographic Approximate Entropy , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[6]  Roberto Hornero,et al.  Interpretation of the auto-mutual information rate of decrease in the context of biomedical signal analysis. Application to electroencephalogram recordings , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Removal of peak and spike noise in EEG signals based on the analytic signal magnitude , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  I Korhonen,et al.  Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  I. Rampil A Primer for EEG Signal Processing in Anesthesia , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[10]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Comparison of Conventional Averaged and Rapid Averaged, Autoregressive-based Extracted Auditory Evoked Potentials for Monitoring the Hypnotic Level during Propofol Induction , 2002, Anesthesiology.