Implications of next generation attenuation ground motion prediction equations for site coefficients used in earthquake resistant design

Proposals are developed to update Tables 11.4‐1 and 11.4‐2 of Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures published as American Society of Civil Engineers Structural Engineering Institute standard 7‐10 (ASCE/SEI 7–10). The updates are mean next generation attenuation (NGA) site coefficients inferred directly from the four NGA ground motion prediction equations used to derive the maximum considered earthquake response maps adopted in ASCE/SEI 7–10. Proposals include the recommendation to use straight‐line interpolation to infer site coefficients at intermediate values of v¯S (average shear velocity to 30‐m depth). The NGA coefficients are shown to agree well with adopted site coefficients at low levels of input motion (0.1 g) and those observed from the Loma Prieta earthquake. For higher levels of input motion, the majority of the adopted values are within the 95% epistemic‐uncertainty limits implied by the NGA estimates with the exceptions being the mid‐period site coefficient, Fv, for site class D and the short‐period coefficient, Fa, for site class C, both of which are slightly less than the corresponding 95% limit. The NGA data base shows that the median value v¯S of 913 m/s for site class B is more typical than 760 m/s as a value to characterize firm to hard rock sites as the uniform ground condition for future maximum considered earthquake response ground motion estimates. Future updates of NGA ground motion prediction equations can be incorporated easily into future adjustments of adopted site coefficients using procedures presented herein. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

[1]  R. Borcherdt Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[2]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Effects of local geological conditions in the San Francisco Bay region on ground motions and the intensities of the 1906 earthquake , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  T. Fumal,et al.  Correlations between seismic wave velocities and physical properties of near-surface geologic materials in the southern San Francisco Bay region, California , 1978 .

[4]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  Site Effects on Strong Shaking and Seismic Risk: Recent Developments and Their Impact on Seismic Design Codes and Practice , 1994 .

[5]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification) , 1994 .

[6]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  New Site Coefficients and Site Classification System Used in Recent Building Seismic Code Provisions , 2000 .

[7]  R. L. Wesson,et al.  USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2000 .

[8]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Site Coefficients in Building Code Provisions , 2002 .

[9]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[10]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps , 2008 .

[11]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[12]  I. M. Idriss,et al.  Comparisons of the NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[13]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[14]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .

[15]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[16]  Anne-Marie Duval,et al.  A Shear Wave Velocity Study Based on the Kik-net Borehole Data: A Short Note , 2009 .

[17]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  NEHRP Site Amplification Factors and the NGA Relationships , 2010 .

[18]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Site Response in NEHRP Provisions and NGA Models , 2012 .

[19]  Roger D. Borcherdt VS30 – A site-characterization parameter for use in building Codes, simplified earthquake resistant design, GMPEs, and ShakeMaps , 2012 .

[20]  Roger D. Borcherdt Implications of NGA for NEHRP Site Coefficients , 2012 .