Politics and the New American Welfare States

Federal law allows states to create new welfare policies determining who can receive welfare, what types of clients are exempted from new welfare work requirements, and the value of cash benefits. This project tests nine different theoretical explanations of welfare policy to explain why states have reacted differently to this new authority. We test these explanations on Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF) policies promulgated between 1997 and 2000. Our findings confirm the strong role of race in TANF politics that Soss et al. (2001) recently reported, but we also find that other constituent characteristics, and institutions, paternalistic goals, and state resources have a consistent influence on welfare policy. These results indicate that different approaches to welfare are attributable to the unique, and very potent, combination of political characteristics in each state.

[1]  Nathaniel N. Beck.  Have We Learned in the Past Few Years , 2001 .

[2]  G. Shaw,et al.  Looking Inward, Looking Outward: The Politics of State Welfare Innovation under Devolution , 2000 .

[3]  Gretchen Rowe,et al.  State TANF Policies as of July 1999. Welfare Rules Databook. Assessing the New Federalism: An Urban Institute Program To Assess Changing Social Policies. , 2000 .

[4]  Thomas M. Holbrook,et al.  Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare Policy , 2002 .

[5]  Paul E. Peterson,et al.  Interstate Competition and Welfare Policy , 1998 .

[6]  Rodney E. Hero.  Faces of inequality : social diversity in American politics , 1998 .

[7]  Richard C. Fording.  The Conditional Effect of Violence as a Political Tactic , 1997 .

[8]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States , 1998 .

[9]  K. Finegold.  Welfare Reform: The Next Act , 2002 .

[10]  Paul E. Spector.  Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction , 1992 .

[11]  Sanford F. Schram,et al.  Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution , 2001 .

[12]  William D. Berry,et al.  An Annual Cost of Living Index for the American States, 1960-1995 , 2000, The Journal of Politics.

[13]  Paul E. Peterson,et al.  American Federalism, Welfare Policy, and Residential Choices , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[14]  K. Martinson.  Reforming Welfare: Institutional Change and Challenges , 2002 .

[15]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States , 1994 .

[16]  Robert D. Brown.  Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[17]  Harold D. Lasswell,et al.  The policy sciences : recent developments in scope and method , 1952 .

[18]  Mark A Smith.  The Nature of Party Governance: Connecting Conceptualization and Measurement , 1997 .

[19]  Bootstraps and Benevolence: A Comparative Test of States’ Capacity to Effect Change in Welfare Outcomes , 2004 .

[20]  Jan E. Leighley,et al.  The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates , 1992 .

[21]  C. Murray,et al.  Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980 , 1984 .

[22]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  A racial/ethnic diversity interpretation of politics and policy in the states of the U.S. , 1996 .

[23]  J. Tweedie.  Resources Rather than Needs: A State-Centered Model of Welfare Policymaking , 1994 .