Individual differences in numerical skills are influenced by brain lateralization in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

Abstract A large number of studies showed that fish possess numerical abilities similar to those reported in mammals and birds. However, inter-individual differences in numerical performance are repeatedly found with different types of stimuli and methodological approaches. A recent study on guppies, Poecilia reticulata, suggested that strongly lateralized individuals, assayed for eye preference in a mirror test, were better than poorly lateralized ones when tested for numerical abilities in a natural shoal choice. This study, however, had a potential confound; both the mirror and the shoal choice tests exploit the higher sociality and schooling tendencies in guppies. It is therefore possible that sociality rather than lateralization per se may have been responsible for the observed differences. In the present study, guppies were selected for high or low lateralization using a non-social test, the detour test. Subjects preferentially turning rightward (RD) or leftward (LD) when facing a dummy predator visible behind a barrier proved better than those with no preference (NL) when required to choose the larger of two groups in a shoal choice test. Our study supports the notion that inter-individual differences in the numerical abilities of guppies are related to their degree of cerebral lateralization.

[1]  M. Dadda,et al.  Sexual Harassment Influences Group Choice in Female Mosquitofish , 2006 .

[2]  C. Brown,et al.  Examining the link between personality and laterality in a feral guppy Poecilia reticulata population. , 2013, Journal of fish biology.

[3]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Roots of brain specializations: preferential left-eye use during mirror-image inspection in six species of teleost fish , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  M. Griggio,et al.  Is the mirror test a valid measure of fish sociability? , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Jackie Chappell,et al.  Lateralization of tool use in New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  M. Dadda,et al.  Enhanced schooling performance in lateralized fishes , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Culum Brown,et al.  The Evolution of lateralized foot use in parrots : a phylogenetic approach , 2011 .

[8]  M. Dadda,et al.  Does brain asymmetry allow efficient performance of simultaneous tasks? , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  R. Jaeger,et al.  Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) go for more: rudiments of number in an amphibian , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[10]  Russell D Gray,et al.  Design complexity and strength of laterality are correlated in New Caledonian crows' pandanus tool manufacture , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Relative versus absolute numerical representation in fish: Can guppies represent “fourness”? , 2015, Animal Cognition.

[13]  L. Rogers.  Hand and paw preferences in relation to the lateralized brain , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Hemispheric memories for the content and position of food caches in the domestic chick. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Development and application of a new method to investigate cognition in newborn guppies , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[16]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Spontaneous versus trained numerical abilities. A comparison between the two main tools to study numerical competence in non-human animals , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Left hemispheric advantage for numerical abilities in the bottlenose dolphin , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[18]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Detour tests reveal task- and stimulus-specific behavioural lateralization in mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[19]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Can honey bees count landmarks? , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  L. A. Carneiro,et al.  Behavioural endocrinology: No hormonal response in tied fights , 2005, Nature.

[21]  Marco Dadda,et al.  A new training procedure for studying discrimination learning in fish , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  C. Packer,et al.  Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Panthera leo , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins (Petroica longipes) , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[24]  Quantitative abilities in a reptile (Podarcis sicula) , 2017, Biology Letters.

[25]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  What causes lateralization of detour behavior in fish? evidence for asymmetries in eye use , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Do Social Conditions Affect Capuchin Monkeys’ (Cebus apella) Choices in a Quantity Judgment Task? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[27]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language , 2002 .

[28]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Laterality enhances numerical skills in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[29]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Discrimination of small numerosities in young chicks. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[30]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Extensive training extends numerical abilities of guppies , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[31]  Lesley J. Rogers,et al.  Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization , 2008 .

[32]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Advantages of having a lateralized brain , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Guppies discriminate between two quantities of food items but prioritize item size over total amount , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  X. Nelson,et al.  The role of numerical competence in a specialized predatory strategy of an araneophagic spider , 2012, Animal Cognition.

[35]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Laterality and cooperation: mosquitofish move closer to a predator when the companion is on their left side , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  C. Tanner.  Numerical assessment affects aggression and competitive ability: a team-fighting strategy for the ant Formica xerophila , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Do fish count? Spontaneous discrimination of quantity in female mosquitofish , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[38]  Marco Dadda,et al.  The costs of hemispheric specialization in a fish , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[40]  Joachim G. Frommen,et al.  Mirror, mirror on the wall: the predictive value of mirror tests for measuring aggression in fish , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  Wolfgang Grodd,et al.  Comparison of quantities: core and format-dependent regions as revealed by fMRI. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Culum Brown,et al.  Cerebral lateralization determines hand preferences in Australian parrots , 2011, Biology Letters.

[43]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies , 2012, PloS one.

[44]  Marco Dadda,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in mosquitofish , 2009, Cognition.

[45]  Numerical discrimination by frogs (Bombina orientalis) , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[46]  L. Regolin,et al.  Detour behaviour, imprinting and visual lateralization in the domestic chick. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[47]  A. Bisazza,et al.  Understanding the origin of number sense: a review of fish studies , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  M. Beran.  Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[49]  Shao-Wu Zhang,et al.  Numerical Cognition in Bees and Other Insects , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[50]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is 2+2=4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations , 2011, NeuroImage.

[51]  Catarina Vila Pouca,et al.  Into the wild: developing field tests to examine the link between elasmobranch personality and laterality , 2016 .

[52]  Claudia Uller,et al.  Quantity discrimination in salamanders , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[53]  Culum Brown,et al.  Laterality is linked to personality in the black-lined rainbowfish, Melanotaenia nigrans , 2014, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[54]  A. Giljov,et al.  Visual Laterality of Calf–Mother Interactions in Wild Whales , 2010, PloS one.

[55]  E. Natoli,et al.  Free-ranging dogs assess the quantity of opponents in intergroup conflicts , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[56]  Culum Brown,et al.  Laterality enhances cognition in Australian parrots , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[58]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Asymmetry pays: visual lateralization improves discrimination success in pigeons , 2000, Current Biology.

[59]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Population lateralisation and social behaviour: A study with 16 species of fish , 2000, Laterality.

[60]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Left–right asymmetries of behaviour and nervous system in invertebrates , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[61]  J. Templeton,et al.  A behavioral analysis of prey detection lateralization and unilateral transfer in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[62]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  Effects of predation pressure on the cognitive ability of the poeciliid Brachyraphis episcopi , 2005 .

[63]  Daniel C. Hyde,et al.  Small and large number discrimination in guppies , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[64]  M. Dadda,et al.  Emotional responsiveness in fish from lines artificially selected for a high or low degree of laterality , 2007, Physiology & Behavior.

[65]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Laterality in the wild: preferential hemifield use during predatory and sexual behaviour in the black-winged stilt , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  M. Dadda,et al.  Sex Differences in Discrimination of Shoal Size in the Guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2016 .

[67]  Christian Agrillo,et al.  Inter-Specific Differences in Numerical Abilities Among Teleost Fish , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[68]  V. A. Sovrano.  Visual lateralization in response to familiar and unfamiliar stimuli in fish , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[69]  V. Braithwaite,et al.  Heritable and experiential effects on boldness in a tropical poeciliid , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[70]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .