A peridynamics–SPH coupling approach to simulate soil fragmentation induced by shock waves

In this work, a nonlocal peridynamics–smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) coupling formulation has been developed and implemented to simulate soil fragmentation induced by buried explosions. A peridynamics–SPH coupling strategy has been developed to model the soil–explosive gas interaction by assigning the soil as peridynamic particles and the explosive gas as SPH particles. Artificial viscosity and ghost particle enrichment techniques are utilized in the simulation to improve computational accuracy. A Monaghan type of artificial viscosity function is incorporated into both the peridynamics and SPH formulations in order to eliminate numerical instabilities caused by the shock wave propagation. Moreover, a virtual or ghost particle method is introduced to improve the accuracy of peridynamics approximation at the boundary. Three numerical simulations have been carried out based on the proposed peridynamics–SPH theory: (1) a 2D explosive gas expansion using SPH, (2) a 2D peridynamics–SPH coupling example, and (3) an example of soil fragmentation in a 3D soil block due to shock wave expansion. The simulation results reveal that the peridynamics–SPH coupling method can successfully simulate soil fragmentation generated by the shock wave due to buried explosion.

[1]  Shaofan Li,et al.  Meshfree simulations of plugging failures in high-speed impacts , 2010 .

[2]  R. Lehoucq,et al.  Convergence of Peridynamics to Classical Elasticity Theory , 2008 .

[3]  Guillermo Rein,et al.  44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit , 2006 .

[4]  S. Silling,et al.  Peridynamic States and Constitutive Modeling , 2007 .

[5]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[6]  L. Libersky,et al.  High strain Lagrangian hydrodynamics: a three-dimensional SPH code for dynamic material response , 1993 .

[7]  T. Hughes,et al.  Finite rotation effects in numerical integration of rate constitutive equations arising in large‐deformation analysis , 1980 .

[8]  R. D. Richtmyer,et al.  A Method for the Numerical Calculation of Hydrodynamic Shocks , 1950 .

[9]  T. L. Warren,et al.  A non-ordinary state-based peridynamic method to model solid material deformation and fracture , 2009 .

[10]  S. Silling,et al.  Viscoplasticity using peridynamics , 2010 .

[11]  Shaofan Li,et al.  Modeling and simulation of large-scale ductile fracture in plates and shells , 2012 .

[12]  Dan Huang,et al.  Peridynamic Modeling of Concrete Structures , 2014 .

[13]  J. Monaghan On the problem of penetration in particle methods , 1989 .

[14]  X. Chen,et al.  Continuous and discontinuous finite element methods for a peridynamics model of mechanics , 2011 .

[15]  D. C. Drucker,et al.  Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design , 1952 .

[16]  Julian J. Rimoli,et al.  An approach for incorporating classical continuum damage models in state-based peridynamics , 2013 .

[17]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[18]  Bhanu Kiran Tuniki Peridynamic constitutive model for concrete , 2012 .

[19]  Huafeng Liu,et al.  Meshfree Particle Methods , 2004 .

[20]  Stewart Andrew Silling,et al.  Peridynamic Modeling of Impact Damage , 2004 .

[21]  Nicolas Sau,et al.  Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures , 2007 .

[22]  F. Bobaru,et al.  The Meaning, Selection, and Use of the Peridynamic Horizon and its Relation to Crack Branching in Brittle Materials , 2012, International Journal of Fracture.

[23]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method , 2003 .

[24]  Shaofan Li,et al.  A three‐dimensional atomistic‐based process zone model simulation of fragmentation in polycrystalline solids , 2013 .

[25]  Not Available Not Available Meshfree particle methods , 2000 .

[26]  J. Monaghan Simulating Free Surface Flows with SPH , 1994 .

[27]  Ratan Jha,et al.  47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference , 2006 .

[28]  S. Silling Reformulation of Elasticity Theory for Discontinuities and Long-Range Forces , 2000 .

[29]  Nik Abdullah Nik Mohamed,et al.  Viscoelastic material models in peridynamics , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[30]  Mhamed Souli,et al.  High explosive simulation using multi-material formulations , 2006 .

[31]  Jifeng Xu,et al.  Peridynamic analysis of damage and failure in composites. , 2006 .

[32]  L. Torres ASSESSMENT OF THE APPLICABILITY OF NONLINEAR DRUCKER-PRAGER MODEL WITH CAP TO ADOBE , 2012 .

[33]  Teruo Nakai,et al.  STRESS-DEFORMATION AND STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS OF SOIL UNDER THREE DIFFERENT PRINCIPAL STRESSES , 1974 .

[34]  Erkan Oterkus,et al.  Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications , 2013 .

[35]  R. Borst,et al.  Non-Associated Plasticity for Soils, Concrete and Rock , 1984 .

[36]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A meshfree unification: reproducing kernel peridynamics , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[37]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  Analysis of Brazed Single-Lap Joints Using the Peridynamics Theory , 2006 .

[38]  Lianghao Han,et al.  A modified Drucker-Prager Cap model for die compaction simulation of pharmaceutical powders , 2008 .

[39]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Reproducing kernel particle methods , 1995 .

[40]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Multi-scale methods , 2000 .

[41]  Shaofan Li,et al.  Reproducing kernel hierarchical partition of unity, Part I—formulation and theory , 1999 .