Influence of the curing mode on the degree of conversion of a dual-cured self-adhesive resin luting cement beneath ceramic

Abstract Objective. To evaluate the effect of the delayed photoactivation and ceramic barrier on the degree of conversion (DC) of self-adhesive resin cement. Materials and methods. Circular specimens (5 mm in diameter × 1 mm in thickness) of the RelyX U-100 resin cement were made using the following curing protocols (n = 10): (G1) 40 s beneath a IPS Empress II ceramic; (G2) 40 s of direct photocuring; (G3) 80 s beneath the ceramic; (G4) 80 s of direct photocuring; (G5) self-curing; (G6) 5 min in the absence of light (self-curing) followed by transceramic photocuring for 40 s; (G7) 5 min in the absence of light (self-curing) followed by transceramic photocuring for 80 s. All the specimens were photoactivated by LED (800 mW/cm2). After 24 h of dry storage, the DC was measured by FTIR, on the top surface of the specimens. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p ≤ 0.05). Results. Direct photocuring with no ceramic interposition, regardless of the curing time (40 s and 80 s) promoted the highest conversion mean (56.79 ± 1.19 and 59.98 ± 2.93, respectively) and the 5 min delay time for the transceramic photocuring presented a similar mean compared to the immediate transceramic photocuring. The DC was influenced by the ceramic barrier, decreasing the conversion values (49.72 ± 1.91 for 40 s and 52.36 ± 2.50 for 80 s), with no statistical difference from the groups with the previous 5 min of photoactivation delay. The self-cure only showed the worst DC values. Conclusion. Direct photocuring provided a higher degree of conversion for the self-adhesive resin cement. The delayed light activation did not influence the degree of conversion for the resin cement tested.

[1]  P. Jardim,et al.  Dual and self-curing potential of self-adhesive resin cements as thin films. , 2011, Operative dentistry.

[2]  E. Piva,et al.  Effect of immediate or delayed light activation on curing kinetics and shrinkage stress of dual-cure resin cements. , 2011, Operative dentistry.

[3]  C. Arrais,et al.  Light-activation through indirect ceramic restorations: does the overexposure compensate for the attenuation in light intensity during resin cement polymerization? , 2011, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[4]  P. H. dos Santos,et al.  Influence of extended light exposure time on the degree of conversion and plasticization of materials used as pit and fissure sealants. , 2010, Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry.

[5]  A. Faria-E-Silva,et al.  Activation mode effects on the shear bond strength of dual-cured resin cements. , 2010, Operative dentistry.

[6]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  Influence of curing mode and time on degree of conversion of one conventional and two self-adhesive resin cements. , 2010, Operative dentistry.

[7]  Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho,et al.  Effect of light energy density on conversion degree and hardness of dual-cured resin cement. , 2010, Operative dentistry.

[8]  L. Paulillo,et al.  The effect of curing light and chemical catalyst on the degree of conversion of two dual cured resin luting cements , 2010, Lasers in Medical Science.

[9]  E. Hellwig,et al.  Curing efficiency of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin cements. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  R. Moraes,et al.  Impact of immediate and delayed light activation on self-polymerization of dual-cured dental resin luting agents. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  R. Moraes,et al.  Panavia F: the role of the primer. , 2009, Journal of oral science.

[12]  V. Bagnato,et al.  Changes on degree of conversion of dual-cure luting light-cured with blue LED , 2009 .

[13]  R. Moraes,et al.  Impact of curing protocol on the selected properties of a model bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resin composite , 2009, Biomedical materials.

[14]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  Effect of curing mode on the polymerization characteristics of dual-cured resin cement systems. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  R. Moraes,et al.  Light-activation of resin cement through ceramic: relationship between irradiance intensity and bond strength to dentin. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[16]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Contraction stress and physical properties development of a resin-based composite irradiated using modulated curing methods at two C-factor levels. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  R. Moraes,et al.  Light- and time-dependent polymerization of dual-cured resin luting agent beneath ceramic , 2008, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[18]  G. Correr,et al.  Modulated photoactivation methods--effect on marginal and internal gap formation of restorations using different restorative composites. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[19]  R. Carvalho,et al.  Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[20]  H. Gerth,et al.  Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites--a comparative study. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Wear and Marginal Breakdown of Composites with Various Degrees of Cure , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[22]  F. Rueggeberg,et al.  The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements. , 1993, Operative dentistry.

[23]  G. Pearson,et al.  Water sorption and solubility of resin-based materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system. , 1989, Journal of oral rehabilitation.