"You made it, you take care of it": Data Management as Personal Information Management

This study explores how researchers at a major Midwestern university are managing their data, as well as the factors that have shaped their practices and those that motivate or inhibit changes to that practice. A combination of survey (n=363) and interview data (n=15) yielded both qualitative and quantitative results bearing on my central research question: In what types of data management activities do researchers at this institution engage? Corollary to that, I also explored the following questions: What do researchers feel could be improved about their data management practices? Which services might be of interest to them? How do they feel those services could most effectively be implemented? In this paper, I situate researchers’ data management practices within a theory of personal information management. I present a view of data management and preservation needs from researchers’ perspectives across a range of domains. Additionally, I discuss the implications that understanding research data management as personal information management has for introducing services to support and improve data management practice.

[1]  Kellie Snow,et al.  Incremental scoping study and implementation plan , 2010 .

[2]  M. Noor,et al.  Data Sharing: How Much Doesn't Get Submitted to GenBank? , 2006, PLoS biology.

[3]  Charles Anderson,et al.  The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete , 2008 .

[4]  Tyler O. Walters,et al.  Data Curation Program Development in U.S. Universities: The Georgia Institute of Technology Example , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[5]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Order from chaos: The poetics and pragmatics of scientific recordkeeping , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  K. Shankar Recordkeeping in the Production of Scientific Knowledge: An Ethnographic Study , 2004 .

[7]  N. Hawkins,et al.  Data sharing in genomics — re-shaping scientific practice , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Margaret Henty,et al.  Investigating Data Management Practices in Australian Universities , 2008 .

[9]  C. Rusbridge,et al.  The International Journal of Digital Curation , 2008 .

[10]  Luis Martinez Uribe,et al.  Findings of the scoping study interviews and the research data management workshop , 2008 .

[11]  Nigel Stanger,et al.  Keeping research data safe , 2009 .

[12]  Christine Hine,et al.  Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work , 2006 .

[13]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  User Engagement in Research Data Curation , 2009, ECDL.

[14]  Melissa H. Cragin,et al.  Scientific Data Collections and Distributed Collective Practice , 2006, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  Andrew Treloar,et al.  Data management and the curation continuum: how the Monash experience is informing repository relationships , 2008 .

[16]  Gail Steinhart,et al.  Digital Research Data Curation: Overview of Issues, Current Activities, and Opportunities for the Cornell University Library , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Williams,et al.  The personal curation of digital objects: A lifecycle approach , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[18]  C. Lynch The Institutional Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure and E-Research. , 2008 .

[19]  C. Borgman Supporting the “Scholarship” in e-Scholarship , 2008 .

[20]  William Jones Personal Information Management , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  From writing and analysis to the repository: taking the scholars' perspective on scholarly archiving , 2008, JCDL '08.

[22]  Christian J Stoeckert,et al.  Much room for improvement in deposition rates of expression microarray datasets , 2008, Nature Methods.

[23]  Michael Witt,et al.  Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  David Elsweiler,et al.  Keeping Found Things Found: The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..