A novel 3D mouse embryo atlas based on micro-CT

The goal of the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) is to phenotype targeted knockout mouse strains throughout the whole mouse genome (23,000 genes) by 2021. A significant percentage of the generated mice will be embryonic lethal; therefore, phenotyping methods tuned to the mouse embryo are needed. Methods that are robust, quantitative, automated and high-throughput are attractive owing to the numbers of mice involved. Three-dimensional (3D) imaging is a useful method for characterizing morphological phenotypes. However, tools to automatically quantify morphological information of mouse embryos from 3D imaging have not been fully developed. We present a representative mouse embryo average 3D atlas comprising micro-CT images of 35 individual C57BL/6J mouse embryos at 15.5 days post-coitum. The 35 micro-CT images were registered into a consensus average image with our automated image registration software and 48 anatomical structures were segmented manually. We report the mean and variation in volumes for each of the 48 segmented structures. Mouse organ volumes vary by 2.6-4.2% on a linear scale when normalized to whole body volume. A power analysis of the volume data reports that a 9-14% volume difference can be detected between two classes of mice with sample sizes of eight. This resource will be crucial in establishing baseline anatomical phenotypic measurements for the assessment of mutant mouse phenotypes, as any future mutant embryo image can be registered to the atlas and subsequent organ volumes calculated automatically.

[1]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  Anatomical phenotyping in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome with magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  Automated deformation analysis in the YAC128 Huntington disease mouse model , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  Jacob Ellegood,et al.  Brain abnormalities in a Neuroligin3 R451C knockin mouse model associated with autism , 2011, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[4]  B. Metscher MicroCT for developmental biology: A versatile tool for high‐contrast 3D imaging at histological resolutions , 2009, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[5]  Diego Rasskin-Gutman,et al.  High-resolution episcopic microscopy: a rapid technique for high detailed 3D analysis of gene activity in the context of tissue architecture and morphology , 2006, Anatomy and Embryology.

[6]  J. Epstein,et al.  Rapid 3D Phenotyping of Cardiovascular Development in Mouse Embryos by Micro-CT With Iodine Staining , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  Marc Modat,et al.  Magnetic resonance virtual histology for embryos: 3D atlases for automated high-throughput phenotyping , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  High resolution three-dimensional brain atlas using an average magnetic resonance image of 40 adult C57Bl/6J mice , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[10]  R Mark Henkelman,et al.  Genes into geometry: imaging for mouse development in 3D. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[11]  Veronique D. Bohbot,et al.  Maze training in mice induces MRI-detectable brain shape changes specific to the type of learning , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A three-dimensional MRI atlas of the mouse brain with estimates of the average and variability. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Heidi Phillips,et al.  3D micro-CT imaging of the postmortem brain , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  R Mark Henkelman,et al.  MicroCT scanner performance and considerations for vascular specimen imaging. , 2004, Medical physics.

[16]  B. Metscher MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues , 2009, BMC Physiology.

[17]  Wolfgang Wurst,et al.  A Mouse for All Reasons , 2007, Cell.

[18]  Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome , 2002, Nature.

[19]  W. Weninger,et al.  Phenotyping transgenic embryos: a rapid 3-D screening method based on episcopic fluorescence image capturing , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[20]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[21]  J. Vane,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002 .

[22]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  R Mark Henkelman,et al.  Multiple‐mouse MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  A. Copp,et al.  Death before birth: clues from gene knockouts and mutations. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[25]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Comparative SNR for high‐throughput mouse embryo MR microscopy , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Matthew H. Kaufman,et al.  The Atlas of Mouse Development , 1992 .

[27]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  Sexual dimorphism revealed in the structure of the mouse brain using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Hecksher-Sørensen,et al.  Optical Projection Tomography as a Tool for 3D Microscopy and Gene Expression Studies , 2002, Science.

[29]  R. M. Henkelman,et al.  Mouse embryonic phenotyping by morphometric analysis of MR images , 2010, Physiological genomics.

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Cerebral asymmetries in 12-week-old C57Bl/6J mice measured by magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  S. Neubauer,et al.  Identification of cardiac malformations in mice lacking Ptdsr using a novel high-throughput magnetic resonance imaging technique , 2004, BMC Developmental Biology.