The control of saccadic adaptation: implications for the scanning of natural visual scenes

Accurate scanning of natural scenes depends on: (1) attentional selection of the target; (2) spatial pooling over the attended target to compute the precise landing position; and (3) adaptive modification of saccades to ensure saccadic accuracy. The present experiments studied adaptation. Adaptive modifications were induced by displacing the target during saccades. Adaptation was found to be: (1) similar for a small target point and a large target circle, despite the differences in the spatial pattern of landing position errors for each; (2) unaffected by instructions to look part way to the target, even though such instructions altered landing position error relative to the target; and (3) insensitive to symbolic cues disclosing the direction of the intra-saccadic displacement. Briefly delaying the presentation of the post-saccadic target greatly reduced adaptation. Neither corrective saccades, nor the position errors that trigger corrections, were involved in adaptation because corrective saccades rarely occurred with a large target circle even though the circle produced as much adaptation as the single point. Taken together, the results do not support the traditional notion that post-saccadic retinal position error controls adaptation. We propose that adaptation relies on a comparison of the actual post-saccadic retinal image with the post-saccadic image that would be predicted based on a representation of the planned saccade. Such a comparison: (1) is consistent with our results; (2) may be more effective than retinal position error in controlling adaptation in natural visual scenes containing large targets and backgrounds; and (3) is similar to the motion-based adaptive mechanisms associated with the VOR. Similarity between the adaptive control of saccades and adaptive control of the VOR raises the possibility that the most important role of saccadic adaptation may be the coordination of eye and head movements during shifts of gaze.

[1]  L M Optican,et al.  Adaptive properties of the saccadic system. , 1985, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[2]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions , 1978, Vision Research.

[3]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The role of location probability in the programming of saccades: Implications for “center-of-gravity” tendencies , 1989, Vision Research.

[5]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Findlay.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[7]  W. Wolf,et al.  Properties of Parametric Adjustment in the Saccadic System , 1984 .

[8]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of random dot targets , 1998, Vision Research.

[9]  Optican Lm.  Adaptive properties of the saccadic system. , 1985 .

[10]  S. C. Mclaughlin.  Parametric adjustment in saccadic eye movements , 1967 .

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Functional anatomy of saccadic adaptation in humans , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Julie Epelboim,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(97)00450-1 , 1998 .

[14]  Eileen Kowler.  Cognitive expectations, not habits, control anticipatory smooth oculomotor pursuit , 1989, Vision Research.

[15]  H. D. Crane,et al.  Accurate three-dimensional eyetracker. , 1978, Applied optics.

[16]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[17]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[18]  E Kowler,et al.  Illusory shifts in visual direction accompany adaptation of saccadic eye movements , 1999, Nature.

[19]  J. A. Gisbergen,et al.  Specificity of saccadic adaptation in three-dimensional space , 1997, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Opstal,et al.  Monkey Superior Colliculus Activity During Short-Term Saccadic Adaptation , 1997, Brain Research Bulletin.

[21]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Miniature eye movement. , 1973, Science.

[22]  E Kowler,et al.  Saccadic localization of eccentric forms. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  R M Steinman,et al.  Compensatory eye movements during active and passive head movements: fast adaptation to changes in visual magnification. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[24]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  The Head-neck sensory motor system , 1992 .

[25]  A. Fuchs,et al.  Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.

[27]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The role of separation and eccentricity in encoding position , 1990, Vision Research.

[28]  J E Albano,et al.  Rapid adaptation of saccadic amplitude in humans and monkeys. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  F. Ottes,et al.  Latency dependence of colour-based target vs nontarget discrimination by the saccadic system , 1985, Vision Research.

[30]  H. Deubel.  Is saccadic adaptation context-specific? , 1995 .

[31]  S. Wray.  Adaptive mechanisms in gaze control. , 1986, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[32]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Shapes, surfaces and saccades , 1999, Vision Research.

[33]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  The effect of expectations on slow oculomotor control—II. Single target displacements , 1979, Vision Research.

[34]  Erik Blaser,et al.  The accuracy and precision of saccades to small and large targets , 1995, Vision Research.

[35]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Adaptive Control of Saccade Metrics , 1991 .

[36]  W. B. Templeton,et al.  Saccadic plasticity: parametric adaptive control by retinal feedback. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Two mechanisms for localization? Evidence for separation-dependent and separation-independent processing of position information , 1990, Vision Research.

[38]  J. O'regan,et al.  Eye fixations near corners: evidence for a centre of gravity calculation based on contrast, rather than luminance or curvature , 1994, Vision Research.

[39]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movement research : mechanisms, processes and applications , 1995 .

[40]  C. Scudder,et al.  Comparison of two methods of producing adaptation of saccade size and implications for the site of plasticity. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[42]  J. Stern.  Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[43]  D L Sparks,et al.  Activity of cells in the deeper layers of the superior colliculus of the rhesus monkey: evidence for a gaze displacement command. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Carolina M. Zingale,et al.  Planning sequences of saccades , 1987, Vision Research.