An adaptive Kriging surrogate method for efficient joint estimation of hydraulic and biochemical parameters in reactive transport modeling.

Groundwater reactive transport models that consider the coupling of hydraulic and biochemical processes are vital tools for predicting the fate of groundwater contaminants and effective groundwater management. The models involve a large number of parameters whose specification greatly affects the model performance. Thus model parameters calibration is crucial to its successful application. The Bayesian inference framework implemented by Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling provides a comprehensive framework to estimate the model parameters. However, its application is hampered by the large computational requirements caused by repeated evaluations of the model in MCMC sampling. This study develops an adaptive Kriging-based MCMC method to overcome the bottleneck of Bayesian inference by replacing the simulation model with a computationally inexpensive Kriging surrogate model. In the adaptive Kriging-based MCMC method, instead of constructing a globally accurate surrogate of the simulation model, we sequentially build a locally accurate surrogate with an iterative refinement to the high probability regions. The performance of the proposed method is demonstrated using a synthetic groundwater reactive transport model for describing sequential Kinetic degradation of Tetrachloroethene (PCE), whose hydraulic and biochemical parameters are jointly estimated. The results suggest that the adaptive Kriging-based MCMC method is able to achieve an accurate Bayesian inference with a hundredfold reduction in the computational cost compared to the conventional MCMC method.

[1]  Jasper A. Vrugt,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation using the DREAM software package: Theory, concepts, and MATLAB implementation , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  James N. Petersen,et al.  Development of analytical solutions for multispecies transport with serial and parallel reactions , 1999 .

[3]  Bryan A. Tolson,et al.  Review of surrogate modeling in water resources , 2012 .

[4]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Efficient Bayesian inference of subsurface flow models using nested sampling and sparse polynomial chaos surrogates , 2014 .

[5]  Cosmin Safta,et al.  Bayesian calibration of terrestrial ecosystem models: a study of advanced Markov chain Monte Carlo methods , 2017 .

[6]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[7]  J N Petersen,et al.  Successive identification of biodegradation rates for multiple sequentially reactive contaminants in groundwater. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[8]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[9]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  A sparse grid based Bayesian method for contaminant source identification , 2012 .

[10]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  F. Brockman,et al.  Subsurface microbiological heterogeneity: current knowledge, descriptive approaches and applications , 1997 .

[12]  L. Matott,et al.  Calibration of subsurface batch and reactive-transport models involving complex biogeochemical processes , 2008 .

[13]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  Comparison of function approximation, heuristic, and derivative‐based methods for automatic calibration of computationally expensive groundwater bioremediation models , 2005 .

[14]  Ming Ye,et al.  A computer program for uncertainty analysis integrating regression and Bayesian methods , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  D. Fennell,et al.  Assessment of indigenous reductive dechlorinating potential at a TCE-contaminated site using microcosms, polymerase chain reaction analysis, and site data. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[17]  Cheng Chen,et al.  Efficient Bayesian experimental design for contaminant source identification , 2015, Water Resources Research.

[18]  Ming Ye,et al.  Assessment of parametric uncertainty for groundwater reactive transport modeling , 2014 .

[19]  Ming Ye,et al.  Evaluating two sparse grid surrogates and two adaptation criteria for groundwater Bayesian uncertainty quantification , 2016 .

[20]  Perry L. McCarty,et al.  Chlorinated Ethene Half-Velocity Coefficients (KS) for Reductive Dehalogenation , 1999 .

[21]  Liangping Li,et al.  Inverse methods in hydrogeology: Evolution and recent trends , 2014 .

[22]  D. Mallants,et al.  Efficient posterior exploration of a high‐dimensional groundwater model from two‐stage Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and polynomial chaos expansion , 2013 .

[23]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  An efficient, high-order perturbation approach for flow in random porous media via Karhunen-Loève and polynomial expansions , 2004 .

[24]  Tiangang Cui,et al.  Bayesian calibration of a large‐scale geothermal reservoir model by a new adaptive delayed acceptance Metropolis Hastings algorithm , 2011 .

[25]  G. C. Tiao,et al.  Bayesian inference in statistical analysis , 1973 .

[26]  D. Higdon,et al.  Accelerating Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation by Differential Evolution with Self-Adaptive Randomized Subspace Sampling , 2009 .

[27]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  A Sparse Grid Stochastic Collocation Method for Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data , 2008, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[28]  Ming Ye,et al.  An adaptive sparse‐grid high‐order stochastic collocation method for Bayesian inference in groundwater reactive transport modeling , 2013 .

[29]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A review of surrogate models and their application to groundwater modeling , 2015 .

[30]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[31]  P. Reichert,et al.  Linking statistical bias description to multiobjective model calibration , 2012 .

[32]  Olaf Kolditz,et al.  Assessing measurement uncertainty of first‐order degradation rates in heterogeneous aquifers , 2006 .

[33]  G. Schoups,et al.  Inference of reactive transport model parameters using a Bayesian multivariate approach , 2014 .

[34]  Christine A. Shoemaker,et al.  A Stochastic Radial Basis Function Method for the Global Optimization of Expensive Functions , 2007, INFORMS J. Comput..

[35]  Cajo J. F. ter Braak,et al.  Treatment of input uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Doing hydrology backward with Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2008 .

[36]  C. Appelo,et al.  PHT3D: A Reactive Multicomponent Transport Model for Saturated Porous Media , 2010, Ground water.

[37]  Martin D. Buhmann,et al.  Radial Basis Functions: Theory and Implementations: Preface , 2003 .

[38]  Lingzao Zeng,et al.  An adaptive Gaussian process‐based method for efficient Bayesian experimental design in groundwater contaminant source identification problems , 2016 .

[39]  F. O’Sullivan A Statistical Perspective on Ill-posed Inverse Problems , 1986 .