A tale of two trainers: virtual reality versus a video trainer for acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the transferability of basic laparoscopic skills between a virtual reality simulator (MIST-VR) and a video trainer box (D-Box). METHODS Forty-six medical students were randomized into 2 groups, training on MIST-VR or D-Box. After training with one modality, a crossover assessment on the other was performed. RESULTS When tested on MIST-VR, the MIST-VR group showed significantly shorter time (90.3 seconds vs 188.6 seconds, P <.001), better economy of movements (4.40 vs 7.50, P <.001), and lower score (224.7 vs 527.0, P <.001). However, when assessed on the D-Box, there was no difference between the groups for time (402.0 seconds vs 325.6 seconds, P = .152), total hand movements (THC) (289 vs 262, P = .792), or total path length (TPL) (34.9 m vs 34.6 m, P = .388). CONCLUSION Both simulators provide significant improvement in performance. Our results indicate that skills learned on the MIST-VR are transferable to the D-Box, but the opposite cannot be demonstrated.

[1]  John J. van den Dobbelsteen,et al.  Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  A. Darzi,et al.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[3]  Daniel B. Jones,et al.  Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[4]  Richard M Satava,et al.  Surgical competence and surgical proficiency: definitions, taxonomy, and metrics. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[5]  C. Frantzides,et al.  Participants' opinions of laparoscopic training devices after a basic laparoscopic training course. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[6]  Parvati Dev,et al.  Comparison of training on two laparoscopic simulators and assessment of skills transfer to surgical performance. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  G. Fried,et al.  Proving the Value of Simulation in Laparoscopic Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[8]  A. Darzi,et al.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  E. DeMaria,et al.  Training the novice in laparoscopy , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  C. Frantzides,et al.  Assessment of Individual Hand Performance in Box Trainers Compared to Virtual Reality Trainers , 2003, The American surgeon.

[11]  Georg Bretthauer,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study to Test the Transfer of Basic Psychomotor Skills From Virtual Reality to Physical Reality in a Comparable Training Setting , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[12]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[13]  Atul K. Madan,et al.  Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  Douglas Landsittel,et al.  Laparoscopic skills training using a webcam trainer. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Atul K. Madan,et al.  Substituting Virtual Reality Trainers for Inanimate Box Trainers Does Not Decrease Laparoscopic Skills Acquisition , 2007, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[16]  C. Frantzides,et al.  Self-reported versus observed scores in laparoscopic skills training , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[17]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  G. Fried,et al.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. , 2004, Surgery.

[19]  C. Frantzides,et al.  Predicting baseline laparoscopic surgery skills , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[20]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  An Evaluation of the Feasibility, Validity, and Reliability of Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in the Operating Room , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[21]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Evaluation of structured and quantitative training methods for teaching intracorporeal knot tying , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[22]  R. Satava,et al.  Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[23]  James R Korndorffer,et al.  Multicenter construct validity for southwestern laparoscopic videotrainer stations. , 2005, The Journal of surgical research.

[24]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Metrics for objective Assessment , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[25]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[26]  A. Darzi,et al.  Practice distribution in procedural skills training , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[27]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[28]  P. Ström,et al.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[29]  A. Darzi,et al.  Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task , 2001, Surgical Endoscopy.