Effect of atenolol and diltiazem on heart period variability in normal persons.

Several time and frequency domain measures of heart period variability are reduced 1 to 2 weeks after myocardial infarction, and a reduced standard deviation of normal RR intervals over a 24 h period (SDNN) is associated with increased mortality. The predictive accuracy of heart period variability may be reduced by drugs used to treat patients after myocardial infarction. Accordingly, a randomized, three period, placebo-controlled, crossover (Latin square) design was used to determine the effect of atenolol and diltiazem on time and frequency measures of heart period variability calculated from 24 h continuous electrocardiographic recordings during treatment with atenolol, diltiazem and placebo in 18 normal volunteers. During atenolol treatment, the 24 h average normal RR (NN) interval increased 24% (p less than 0.001). The three measures of tonic vagal activity were significantly increased (p less than 0.001) during atenolol treatment: percent of successive normal RR intervals greater than 50 ms = 69%, root mean square successive difference of normal RR intervals = 61% and high frequency power in the heart period power spectrum = 84%. Low frequency power also increased 45% (p less than 0.01), indicating that this variable also is an indicator of tonic vagal activity over 24 h. Diltiazem had no significant effect on the 24 h average NN interval or on any measure of heart period variability. The decreased mortality rate after myocardial infarction associated with beta-adrenergic blocker but not calcium channel blocker therapy may be attributed in part to an increase in vagal tone caused by beta-blockers.

[1]  J. Hampton,et al.  Cardiovascular reflexes in patients after myocardial infarction. Effect of long-term treatment with beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. , 1980, British heart journal.

[2]  D. Adam,et al.  Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Effect of diltiazem on cardiac rate and rhythm after myocardial infarction. Multicenter Diltiazem Postinfarction Trial Investigators. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  R. H. Kent,et al.  The Mean Square Successive Difference , 1941 .

[5]  P. Schwartz Neural mechanisms in cardiac arrhythmias , 1978 .

[6]  D. Ewing,et al.  New method for assessing cardiac parasympathetic activity using 24 hour electrocardiograms. , 1984, British heart journal.

[7]  H. L. Stone,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM IN SUDDEN CORONARY DEATH * , 1982, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Eli Warnock,et al.  The effect of diltiazem on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  S. Snyder,et al.  Calcium-antagonist drugs. Receptor interactions that clarify therapeutic effects. , 1985 .

[10]  B. Sayers,et al.  Analysis of heart rate variability. , 1973, Ergonomics.

[11]  S Cerutti,et al.  Heart rate variability as an index of sympathovagal interaction after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  A. Koziell,et al.  Does the sympathetic nervous system influence sinus arrhythmia in man? Evidence from combined autonomic blockade. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  S.M. Kay,et al.  Spectrum analysis—A modern perspective , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  J. Schroeder,et al.  Hemodynamic Observations One and Two Years after Cardiac Transplantation in Man , 1972, Circulation.

[16]  J. Bigger,et al.  How do beta-blockers protect after myocardial infarction? , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[17]  P G Katona,et al.  Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: noninvasive measure of parasympathetic cardiac control. , 1975, Journal of applied physiology.

[18]  E. Scott The effect of atenolol on the spontaneous and reflex activity of the sympathetic nerves in the cat: influence of cardiopulmonary receptors , 1983, British journal of pharmacology.

[19]  J. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments , 1987 .

[20]  K. Kent,et al.  Electrical Stability of Acutely Ischemic Myocardium: Influences of Heart Rate and Vagal Stimulation , 1973, Circulation.

[21]  A. D. Jose,et al.  Autonomic blockade by propranolol and atropine to study intrinsic myocardial function in man. , 1969, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  R. Cohen,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. , 1981, Science.

[23]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Control of Heart Rate by the Autonomic Nervous System: Studies in Man on the Interrelation Between Baroreceptor Mechanisms and Exercise , 1966, Circulation research.

[24]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Comparison of baroreflex sensitivity and heart period variability after myocardial infarction. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Components of heart rate variability measured during healing of acute myocardial infarction. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  R. Cohen,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  J R Hampton,et al.  Assessment of Methods for Estimating Autonomic Nervous Control of the Heart in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus , 1978, Diabetes.

[28]  P. Corr,et al.  Role of the Vagus Nerves in the Cardiovascular Changes Induced by Coronary Occlusion , 1974, Circulation.

[29]  F. Witkowski,et al.  Mechanisms controlling cardiac autonomic function and their relation to arrhythmogenesis , 1986 .