Development of a biocidal treatment regime to inhibit biological growths on cultural heritage: BIODAM

Existing chemical treatments to prevent biological damage to monuments often involve considerable amounts of potentially dangerous and even poisonous biocides. The scientific approach described in this paper aims at a drastic reduction in the concentration of biocide applications by a polyphasic approach of biocides combined with cell permeabilisers, polysaccharide and pigment inhibitors and a photodynamic treatment. A variety of potential agents were screened to determine the most effective combination. Promising compounds were tested under laboratory conditions with cultures of rock deteriorating bacteria, algae, cyanobacteria and fungi. A subsequent field trial involved two sandstone types with natural biofilms. These were treated with multiple combinations of chemicals and exposed to three different climatic conditions. Although treatments proved successful in the laboratory, field trials were inconclusive and further testing will be required to determine the most effective treatment regime. While the most effective combination of chemicals and their application methodology is still being optimised, results to date indicate that this is a promising and effective treatment for the control of a wide variety of potentially damaging organisms colonising stone substrates.

[1]  J. Seckbach Journey to Diverse Microbial Worlds , 2000, Cellular Origin and Life in Extreme Habitats.

[2]  David M. Paterson,et al.  Biostabilization of Sediments , 1994 .

[3]  O. Petrini,et al.  Host Wall Alterations by Parasitic Fungi , 1994 .

[4]  H. Alakomi,et al.  Effect of EDTA on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium involves a component not assignable to lipopolysaccharide release. , 2003, Microbiology.

[5]  M. Jabra-Rizk,et al.  Fungal Biofilms and Drug Resistance , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[6]  C. E. Zobell The Effect of Solid Surfaces upon Bacterial Activity , 1943, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  T. Dougherty,et al.  HOW DOES PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WORK? , 1992, Photochemistry and photobiology.

[8]  P. Domenico,et al.  Resistance to bismuth among gram-negative bacteria is dependent upon iron and its uptake. , 1996, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[9]  G. Baziard-Mouysset,et al.  Interactions between Biocide Cationic Agents and Bacterial Biofilms , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[10]  P. Stewart,et al.  Reduction of polysaccharide production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by bismuth dimercaprol (BisBAL) treatment. , 1999, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[11]  H. Alakomi,et al.  Weakening Effect of Cell Permeabilizers on Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Biodeterioration , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  A. Gorbushina,et al.  Rock Dwelling Fungal Communities: Diversity of Life Styles and Colony Structure , 2000 .

[13]  J. Kelly,et al.  Photochemical interactions of methylene blue and analogues with DNA and other biological substrates. , 1993, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[14]  J. Maillard,et al.  Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in Gram‐negative bacteria , 2002, Journal of applied microbiology.

[15]  R. Donlan Role of Biofilms in Antimicrobial Resistance , 2000, ASAIO journal.

[16]  M. Nicole,et al.  Histology, Ultrastructure and Molecular Cytology of Plant-Microorganism Interactions , 2011, Developments in Plant Pathology.

[17]  J. Gutzmer,et al.  Late Paleoproterozoic Mn-rich oncoids: Earliest evidence for microbially mediated Mn precipitation , 2001 .

[18]  R. Nicholson Adhesion of Fungal Propagules , 1996 .

[19]  G. Geesey,et al.  Isolation and partial chemical analysis of firmly bound exopolysaccharide from adherent cells of a freshwater sediment bacterium. , 1985, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[20]  M. Firestone,et al.  Relationship between Desiccation and Exopolysaccharide Production in a Soil Pseudomonas sp , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[21]  A. Russell Similarities and differences in the responses of microorganisms to biocides. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[22]  Eric Doehne,et al.  Stone Conservation: An Overview of Current Research , 1998 .

[23]  A. D. Russell,et al.  Antibiotic and biocide resistance in bacteria: Introduction , 2002, Journal of applied microbiology.

[24]  J. Lown,,et al.  Photosensitization by antitumor agents 3: spectroscopic evidence for superoxide and hydroxyl radical production by anthrapyrazole-sensitized oxidation of NADH. , 1986, Journal of free radicals in biology & medicine.

[25]  H. Nikaido Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited , 2003, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[26]  A. Gorbushina,et al.  Role of black fungi in color change and biodeterioration of antique marbles , 1993 .

[27]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge , 2003, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[28]  A. Gorbushina Microcolonial fungi: survival potential of terrestrial vegetative structures. , 2003, Astrobiology.

[29]  P. Stewart,et al.  Role of Nutrient Limitation and Stationary-Phase Existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae Biofilm Resistance to Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin , 2003, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[30]  J. Braams,et al.  Biodeterioration of stone: a review , 2000 .

[31]  Tiina Mattila-Sandholm,et al.  Heterotrophic microorganisms in air and biofilm samples from Roman catacombs, with special emphasis on actinobacteria and fungi , 2004 .

[32]  H. Alakomi,et al.  Polyethyleneimine is an effective permeabilizer of gram-negative bacteria. , 1997, Microbiology.

[33]  M. Vaara,et al.  Agents that increase the permeability of the outer membrane. , 1992, Microbiological reviews.

[34]  T. Mattila-Sandholm,et al.  Fluorometric assessment of Gram‐negative bacterial permeabilization , 2000, Journal of applied microbiology.

[35]  K. Ruel,et al.  Fine morphology of fungal structures involved in host wall alteration , 1994 .