Water Transport through Ultrathin Graphene

Graphene can be considered as an ideal membrane since its thickness is only one carbon diameter. In this study, using molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate water transport through a porous graphene membrane and compare the results with water transport through thin (less than 10 nm in thickness/length) carbon nanotube (CNT) membranes. For smaller diameter pores, where a single-file water structure is obtained, CNT membranes provide higher water flux compared to graphene membranes. For larger diameter pores, where the water structure is not single-file, graphene membranes provide higher water flux compared to CNT membranes. Furthermore, in thin CNT membranes, the water flux did not vary significantly with the thickness of the membrane. We explain the results through a detailed analysis considering pressure distribution, velocity profiles, and potential of mean force. This work opens up opportunities for graphene-based membranes in molecular sieving, water filtration, fuel cells, and so forth.

[1]  Steven G. Louie,et al.  Graphene at the Edge: Stability and Dynamics , 2009, Science.

[2]  K. Schulten,et al.  Collective diffusion model for water permeation through microscopic channels. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Osmotic water transport through carbon nanotube membranes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Hillie,et al.  Nanotechnology and the challenge of clean water. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[6]  S. Iijima,et al.  Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers , 2004, Nature.

[7]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[8]  Christoph Dellago,et al.  Proton transport through water-filled carbon nanotubes. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[9]  N. Aluru,et al.  Effect of induced electric field on single-file reverse osmosis. , 2009, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[10]  Ben Corry,et al.  Designing carbon nanotube membranes for efficient water desalination. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  Marija Drndic,et al.  Electron beam nanosculpting of suspended graphene sheets , 2008 .

[12]  Sony Joseph,et al.  Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of water? , 2008, Nano letters.

[13]  Hyung Gyu Park,et al.  Ion exclusion by sub-2-nm carbon nanotube pores , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  T. Gaborski,et al.  Charge- and size-based separation of macromolecules using ultrathin silicon membranes , 2007, Nature.

[15]  N. Aluru,et al.  Fast reverse osmosis using boron nitride and carbon nanotubes , 2008 .

[16]  Boyang Wang,et al.  Selective ion passage through functionalized graphene nanopores. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  Sidney Yip,et al.  Coupling continuum to molecular-dynamics simulation: Reflecting particle method and the field estimator , 1998 .

[18]  S. Dai,et al.  Porous graphene as the ultimate membrane for gas separation. , 2009, Nano letters.

[19]  A. Yamaguchi,et al.  Self-assembly of a silica–surfactant nanocomposite in a porous alumina membrane , 2004, Nature materials.

[20]  L. Kostiuk,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of a pressure-driven liquid transport process in a cylindrical nanopore using two self-adjusting plates. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  K. Schulten,et al.  Pressure-induced water transport in membrane channels studied by molecular dynamics. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[22]  A. M. van der Zande,et al.  Impermeable atomic membranes from graphene sheets. , 2008, Nano letters.

[23]  Wolfgang Meier,et al.  Highly permeable polymeric membranes based on the incorporation of the functional water channel protein Aquaporin Z , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  X. Gong,et al.  A charge-driven molecular water pump. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[25]  SUPARNA DUTTASINHA,et al.  Graphene: Status and Prospects , 2009, Science.

[26]  C. Martens,et al.  Pressure-induced water flow through model nanopores. , 2009, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  Chen,et al.  Electron-phonon interactions and superconductivity in K3C60. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[28]  Mainak Majumder,et al.  Nanoscale hydrodynamics: Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes , 2005, Nature.

[29]  G. Portella,et al.  Invariance of single-file water mobility in gramicidin-like peptidic pores as function of pore length. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Izumi Ichinose,et al.  Ultrafast permeation of water through protein-based membranes. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[31]  X. Gong,et al.  Electrostatic gating of a nanometer water channel , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  G. Hummer,et al.  Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube , 2001, Nature.

[33]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Single-file transport of water molecules through a carbon nanotube. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[34]  K. Novoselov,et al.  Macroscopic graphene membranes and their extraordinary stiffness. , 2008, Nano letters.

[35]  N. Aluru,et al.  Effect of quantum partial charges on the structure and dynamics of water in single-walled carbon nanotubes. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[36]  Rodney Andrews,et al.  Aligned Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Membranes , 2004, Science.

[37]  N. Aluru,et al.  Size and chirality dependent elastic properties of graphene nanoribbons under uniaxial tension. , 2009, Nano letters.