A Novel Partogram for Stages 1 and 2 of Labor Based on Fetal Head Station Measured by Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

Abstract Objective This study was aimed to describe continuous labor curves, including second stage, based on fetal head station. Study Design We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study. The inclusion criteria were women with singleton uncomplicated cephalic term pregnancies in labor, who delivered vaginally. We used a device that combines ultrasound imaging with position-tracking technology to monitor the head station noninvasively throughout labor. We collected data on demographics, labor parameters, and delivery and neonatal outcomes. Results A total of 613 women delivered vaginally, 327 (53.3%) were nulliparous, while 286 (46.7%) were multiparous. Time to delivery (TTD) diminished progressively with descent of the fetal head. When the head is engaged, the labor curve of multiparous women demonstrated a more prominent downward shift in curve as compared with nulliparous women. When comparing multipara and nullipara at engagement level, the median TTD was 1 and 1.62 hours, respectively. In 95% of women with unengaged head during the second stage, TTD of nulliparous and multiparous women were less than 3.8 and 3 hours, respectively. Conclusion While current labor curves end at full dilatation, the described curves were developed throughout stages 1 and 2 of labor. The TTD, according to the station curves, shows an acceleration of labor, once passed the engagement level, especially in multiparous women.

[1]  C. Lees,et al.  The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[2]  E. Katorza,et al.  Correlation between clinical fetal head station and sonographic angle of progression during the second stage of labor , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[3]  T. Lavender,et al.  Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[4]  F. Conversano,et al.  Automatic ultrasound technique to measure angle of progression during labor , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  C. Bibbo,et al.  Angle of Progression on Ultrasound in the Second Stage of Labor and Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery , 2017, American Journal of Perinatology.

[6]  K. Salvesen,et al.  Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  K. Ishii,et al.  Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor , 2016, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  Z. Hagay,et al.  Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  D. Nelson,et al.  Second-stage labor: how long is too long? , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  Y. Paltieli,et al.  5. The LaborPro system: non-invasive, ultrasound-based determination of labor parameters , 2015 .

[11]  E. Montaguti,et al.  Fetal head–symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[12]  Jeanne-Marie Guise,et al.  Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  C. Lees,et al.  The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  E. Montaguti,et al.  Agreement between two‐ and three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head–symphysis distance in active labor , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[15]  A. Morselli-Labate,et al.  Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  G. Pilu,et al.  Fetal head–symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  D. Basu,et al.  Role of a second stage partogram in predicting the outcome of normal labour , 2009, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[19]  Yoav Paltieli,et al.  Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  J. Lange,et al.  Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  G. Pilu,et al.  Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[22]  Roberto Romero,et al.  Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[23]  H. Dietz,et al.  Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  H. Galan,et al.  Defining fetal station. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[25]  J. Wiener,et al.  A Second‐Stage Partogram , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  The graphic analysis of labor. , 1959, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.