A Novel Partogram for Stages 1 and 2 of Labor Based on Fetal Head Station Measured by Ultrasound: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Y. Ville | P. Albert | S. Haberman | O. Buhule | Y. Paltieli | R. Gonen | F. Atallah | J. Nizard
[1] C. Lees,et al. The feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound assessment in the labor room , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[2] E. Katorza,et al. Correlation between clinical fetal head station and sonographic angle of progression during the second stage of labor , 2018, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.
[3] T. Lavender,et al. Effect of partograph use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term and their babies. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[4] F. Conversano,et al. Automatic ultrasound technique to measure angle of progression during labor , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[5] C. Bibbo,et al. Angle of Progression on Ultrasound in the Second Stage of Labor and Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery , 2017, American Journal of Perinatology.
[6] K. Salvesen,et al. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[7] K. Ishii,et al. Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor , 2016, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[8] Z. Hagay,et al. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor , 2017, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[9] D. Nelson,et al. Second-stage labor: how long is too long? , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[10] Y. Paltieli,et al. 5. The LaborPro system: non-invasive, ultrasound-based determination of labor parameters , 2015 .
[11] E. Montaguti,et al. Fetal head–symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of labor , 2014, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.
[12] Jeanne-Marie Guise,et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[13] C. Lees,et al. The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[14] E. Montaguti,et al. Agreement between two‐ and three‐dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head–symphysis distance in active labor , 2014, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[15] A. Morselli-Labate,et al. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[16] G. Pilu,et al. Fetal head–symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor , 2013, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[17] Jun Zhang,et al. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[18] D. Basu,et al. Role of a second stage partogram in predicting the outcome of normal labour , 2009, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.
[19] Yoav Paltieli,et al. Determination of fetal head station and position during labor: a new technique that combines ultrasound and a position-tracking system. , 2009, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[20] J. Lange,et al. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[21] G. Pilu,et al. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[22] Roberto Romero,et al. Sonographic evaluation in the second stage of labor to improve the assessment of labor progress and its outcome , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[23] H. Dietz,et al. Measuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound technique , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
[24] H. Galan,et al. Defining fetal station. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.
[25] J. Wiener,et al. A Second‐Stage Partogram , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.
[26] E. A. Friedman,et al. The graphic analysis of labor. , 1959, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.