The ‘assessment for learning’ pedagogical approach in an Academic Integrity online course development

The online academic integrity course development at the University of Auckland has confirmed recent studies on the practice and impacts of an ‘assessment for learning’ approach in higher education (Gikandi, Morrow & Davis, 2011; McDowell, Sambell & Montgomery, 2013). While assessment is commonly given subsequent to and independent of learning, an ‘assessment for learning’ approach can be defined as “any assessment for which the first priority in its design and practice is to serve the purpose of promoting students’ learning” (Black et al, 2003, p. 10). This article demonstrates how the ‘assessment for learning’ approach was constructively applied in an Academic Integrity online course development. The University of Auckland’s compulsory Academic Integrity course consists of five modules. Each module has formative assessment activities and a set of summative assessment online tests. Usability testing results and students’ feedback informed the course design throughout its development. Five rounds of usability testing were conducted. The findings showed that students responded positively to a combination of multi-media interactive formative assessment activities and online summative tests. This includes real life problem-based scenarios, self-assessment quizzes and fill-in-the-gaps storylines. Each summative assessment question was linked back to a relevant section of the online module. Students were asked to find and read specific information in a course module (e.g. view video, read scenario, complete an activity) and then select the correct answer. A question bank consisting of over 250 multi-choice, scenario-based questions was created, and every student was given a completely new set of six randomly selected questions for each of the five modules in order to prevent repetition and the sharing of answers. This project is significant because it effectively applies the ‘assessment for learning’ approach. By creating combined formative and summative assessments in an online learning environment and applying informed learning design, the University of Auckland’s Academic Integrity online course was successfully developed and well received by students and staff during its pilot in 2012 and faculty-based implementation in 2013.

[1]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .

[2]  C. Evans.  Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education , 2013 .

[3]  Megan Oakleaf.  Dangers and Opportunities: A Conceptual Map of Information Literacy Assessment Approaches , 2008 .

[4]  P. Black,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .

[5]  Caroline F. Timmers,et al.  Motivational beliefs, student effort, and feedback behaviour in computer-based formative assessment , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Maddalena Taras.  Summative assessment: the missing link for formative assessment , 2009 .

[7]  P. Black,et al.  Developing the theory of formative assessment , 2009 .

[8]  D. Nicol,et al.  Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice , 2006 .

[9]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Student reflections on formative e‐assessment: expectations and perceptions , 2008 .

[10]  J. Gardner.  Assessment and learning , 2006 .

[11]  Lorna R. Kearns,et al.  Student Assessment in Online Learning: Challenges and Effective Practices , 2012 .

[12]  John Gardner,et al.  Assessment for learning: a compelling conceptualization , 2012 .

[13]  P. Black,et al.  Meanings and Consequences: a basis for distinguishing formative and summative functions of assessment? , 1996 .

[14]  E. O'Neill-Carrillo,et al.  An introductory learning module on ethics and Academic Integrity for Freshman Engineering students , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[15]  B. Whitley,et al.  Academic Integrity as an Institutional Issue , 2001 .

[16]  R. W. Belter,et al.  A Strategy to Reduce Plagiarism in an Undergraduate Course , 2009 .

[17]  Graham Gibbs,et al.  Using Assessment to Support Student Learning , 2010 .

[18]  Neda Zdravkovic.  The ‘assessment for learning’ pedagogical approach in The University of Auckland Academic Integrity online course , 2013 .

[19]  Clare Lee,et al.  Assessment for Learning- putting it into practice , 2003 .

[20]  J. W. Gikandi,et al.  Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[22]  Amy E. Mark,et al.  Development, Assessment and Use of an On-line Plagiarism Tutorial , 2011, Libr. Hi Tech.

[23]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[24]  V. Shute.  Focus on Formative Feedback , 2008 .

[25]  L Wang.  Designing an interactive virtual learning environment (VLE) with a learner centered approach , 2012 .

[26]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[27]  Margaret Hamilton,et al.  An academic integrity approach to learning and assessment design , 2007 .

[28]  Ulf Stödberg.  A research review of e-assessment , 2012 .

[29]  Catherine Montgomery,et al.  Assessment for Learning in Higher Education , 2012 .

[30]  D. Wiliam.  Integrating summative and formative functions of assessment , 2000 .

[31]  F. White,et al.  A 5‐year systematic strategy to reduce plagiarism among first‐year psychology university students , 2013 .

[32]  D. Wiliam.  What Is Assessment for Learning , 2011 .