Framing as a theory of media effects

Research on framing is characterized by theoretical and empirical vagueness. This is due, in part, to the lack of a commonly shared theoretical model underlying framing research. Conceptual problems translate into operational problems, limiting the comparability of instruments and results. In this paper I systematize the fragmented approaches to framing in political communication and integrate them into a comprehensive model. I classify previous approaches to framing research along two dimensions: the type of frame examined (media frames vs. audience frames) and the way frames are operationalized (independent variable or dependent variable). I develop a process model of framing, identifying four key processes that should be addressed in future research: frame building, frame setting, individual-level processes of framing, and a feedback loop from audiences to journalists.

[1]  D. Shaw,et al.  Communication and democracy : exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory , 1997 .

[2]  D. Kinder,et al.  Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks , 1990 .

[3]  J. N. Bassili,et al.  Response Latency and the Accessibility of Voting Intentions: What Contributes to Accessibility and How it Affects Vote Choice , 1995 .

[4]  Charles D. Elder,et al.  Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building , 1975 .

[5]  W. Gamson,et al.  Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  M. McCombs Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[7]  D. McQuail Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction , 1983 .

[8]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  How Citizens Think about National Issues: A Matter of Responsibility , 1989 .

[9]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents , 1991 .

[10]  Milton Lodge,et al.  A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti‐nuclear movement , 1993 .

[12]  E. López-Escobar,et al.  Candidate Images in Spanish Elections: Second-Level Agenda-Setting Effects , 1997 .

[13]  S. Iyengar Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .

[14]  S. Kraus,et al.  Mass communication and political information processing , 1990 .

[15]  M. Fishman,et al.  Crime Waves as Ideology , 1978 .

[16]  John Geanakoplos,et al.  Common Knowledge , 1992, TARK.

[17]  T. V. Dijk Discourse and communication : new approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication , 1985 .

[18]  Brian Groombridge,et al.  The Effects of Mass Communication , 1965, Mental Health.

[19]  W. Donsbach,et al.  Legitimacy Through Competence Rather Than Value Judgments: the Concept of Journalistic Professionalization Reconsidered , 1981 .

[20]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[21]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  The social psychology of collective action , 1996 .

[22]  Jack M. McLeod Audience Perspectives on the News: Assessing Their Complexity and Conceptual Frames. , 1987 .

[23]  Elihu Katz,et al.  Public opinion and the communication of consent , 1995 .

[24]  Philip H. Abelson Keeping the gates , 1984, Nature.

[25]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[26]  Jürgen Gerhards,et al.  Mesomobilization: Organizing and Framing in Two Protest Campaigns in West Germany , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  W. Gamson,et al.  The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action , 1987 .

[28]  Ann N. Crigler,et al.  Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .

[29]  D. Mckie,et al.  Talking Politics , 1975, The Lancet.

[30]  Murray Edelman,et al.  Contestable categories and public opinion , 1993 .

[31]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  Television News and Citizens' Explanations of National Affairs , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[32]  R. Hastie,et al.  The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line , 1986 .

[33]  Todd Gitlin The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the New Left , 1980 .

[34]  D. White The “Gate Keeper”: A Case Study in the Selection of News , 1950 .

[35]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[36]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[37]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[38]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Getting Levels Across and Crossing Levels , 1989 .

[39]  D. McQuail Mass communication theory: An introduction, 2nd ed. , 1987 .

[40]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm , 1993 .

[41]  D. Snow,et al.  Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. , 1986 .

[42]  S. Iyengar,et al.  News That Matters: Television and American Opinion , 1987 .

[43]  Robert H. Wicks Schema Theory and Measurement in Mass Communication Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in News Information Processing , 1992 .

[44]  Ada W. Finifter,et al.  Political science : the state of the discipline , 1983 .

[45]  Dennis F. Kinsey,et al.  The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns , 1993 .

[46]  Teun A. Van Dijκ Structures of News in the Press , 1985 .

[47]  Pamela J. Shoemaker Mediating The Message , 1991 .

[48]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: the moderating role of attitude accessibility , 1993 .

[49]  M. Fishman Manufacturing the news , 1980 .

[50]  William A. Gamson,et al.  Goffman's legacy to political sociology , 1985 .

[51]  Gaye Tuchman Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality , 1978 .

[52]  D. Charles Whitney,et al.  ‘Keeping the Gates’ for Gatekeepers: The Effects of Wire News , 1982 .

[53]  Dirk Oegema,et al.  POTENTIALS, NETWORKS, MOTIVATIONS, AND BARRIERS: STEPS TOWARDS PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS * , 1987 .

[54]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Multilevel Analysis in Mass Communication Research , 1991 .

[55]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Biased Processing as a Function of Attitude Accessibility: Making Objective Judgments Subjectively , 1989 .

[56]  John E. Woods Politics, Self and Society: A Theme and Variations Heinz Eulau Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1986, pp. x, 567 , 1987 .

[57]  W. Lance Bennett,et al.  Constructing publics and their opinions , 1993 .

[58]  Heinz Eulau,et al.  Multilevel Methods in Comparative Politics , 1977 .

[59]  Roy C. Anderson Out of order , 1998, Nature.

[60]  Shanto Iyengar,et al.  THE ACCESSIBILITY BIAS IN POLITICS: TELEVISION NEWS AND PUBLIC OPINION , 1990 .

[61]  W. Doise,et al.  Levels of Explanation in Social Psychology , 1986 .

[62]  Robert D. Benford,et al.  Master-frames and cycles of protest , 1992 .