Ocular compensation for alternating myopic and hyperopic defocus

During development, the eye grows under visual feedback control, as shown by its compensating for defocus imposed by spectacle lenses. Under normal conditions the sign and magnitude of defocus vary with viewing distance, accommodative status and other factors. To explore how periods of myopic and hyperopic defocus are integrated over time we presented rapidly alternating episodes of myopic and hyperopic defocus by sequentially illuminating a nearby scrim and the wall beyond it to chick eyes wearing lenses that put the far point between the two surfaces. We found that equal periods of myopic and hyperopic defocus generally led to compensatory hyperopia, showing that myopic defocus had a disproportionate effect. Furthermore, the degree of hyperopia depended on the frequency of alternation: low frequencies (1 cycle/30 min) resulted in more hyperopia, whereas at high frequencies (1 cycle/s) the myopic and hyperopic defocus nearly cancelled each other. If similar temporal integration effects apply to humans, they may help explain why brief accommodation events may not influence lens-compensation and why a child's total reading time may be a poor predictor of myopic progression.

[1]  A. Vingrys,et al.  The duration of normal visual exposure necessary to prevent form deprivation myopia in chicks , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Wallman,et al.  Temporal constraints on lens compensation in chicks , 2002, Vision Research.

[3]  J. Wallman,et al.  Developing eyes that lack accommodation grow to compensate for imposed defocus , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  H. Lipschutz MYOPIA AND NEARWORK , 1935, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Wallman,et al.  Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. , 1998, Experimental eye research.

[6]  Ian Morgan,et al.  How genetic is school myopia? , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[7]  D. Mutti,et al.  Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  J. Wallman,et al.  Potency of myopic defocus in spectacle lens compensation. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Homeostasis of Eye Growth and the Question of Myopia , 2012, Neuron.

[10]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Effects of brief periods of unrestricted vision on the development of form-deprivation myopia in monkeys. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  F. Nieto,et al.  Factors Related to the Progression of Myopia in Singaporean Children , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  S. McFadden,et al.  Retinoic acid signals the direction of ocular elongation in the guinea pig eye , 2004, Vision Research.

[13]  K. Schmid,et al.  Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks , 1996, Vision Research.

[14]  E. Irving,et al.  Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  J. Wallman,et al.  Growth of the two layers of the chick sclera is modulated reciprocally by visual conditions. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[17]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys , 1999, Vision Research.

[18]  J. Wallman,et al.  Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: Susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization , 1987, Vision Research.

[19]  Howard C. Howland,et al.  Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick , 1993, Vision Research.

[20]  Andrew R Whatham,et al.  Compensatory changes in eye growth and refraction induced by daily wear of soft contact lenses in young marmosets , 2001, Vision Research.

[21]  J. Wallman,et al.  Severe astigmatic blur does not interfere with spectacle lens compensation. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  C. Wildsoet,et al.  Active emmetropization--evidence for its existence and ramifications for clinical practice. , 1997, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  Josh Wallman,et al.  Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks , 1995, Vision Research.

[25]  Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxy dopamine treatment. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens , 1988, Vision Research.

[27]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[28]  K. Schmid,et al.  Natural and imposed astigmatism and their relation to emmetropization in the chick. , 1997, Experimental eye research.

[29]  F. Schaeffel,et al.  Flicker parameters are different for suppression of myopia and hyperopia , 1997, Vision Research.