An Objective Measure of Noseband Tightness and Its Measurement Using a Novel Digital Tightness Gauge

Noseband tightness is difficult to assess in horses participating in equestrian sports such as dressage, show jumping and three-day-eventing. There is growing concern that nosebands are commonly tightened to such an extent as to restrict normal equine behaviour and possibly cause injury. In the absence of a clear agreed definition of noseband tightness, a simple model of the equine nose-noseband interface environment was developed in order to guide further studies in this area. The normal force component of the noseband tensile force was identified as the key contributor to sub-noseband tissue compression. The model was used to inform the design of a digital tightness gauge which could reliably measure the normal force component of the noseband tensile force. A digital tightness gauge was developed to measure this parameter under nosebands fitted to bridled horses. Results are presented for field tests using two prototype designs. Prototype version three was used in field trial 1 (n = 15, frontal nasal plane sub-noseband site). Results of this trial were used to develop an ergonomically designed prototype, version 4, which was tested in a second field trial (n = 12, frontal nasal plane and lateral sub-noseband site). Nosebands were set to three tightness settings in each trial as judged by a single rater using an International Society for Equitation Science (ISES) taper gauge. Normal forces in the range 7–95 N were recorded at the frontal nasal plane while a lower range 1–28 N was found at the lateral site for the taper gauge range used in the trials. The digital tightness gauge was found to be simple to use, reliable, and safe and its use did not agitate the animals in any discernable way. A simple six point tightness scale is suggested to aid regulation implementation and the control of noseband tightness using normal force measurement as the objective tightness discriminant.

[1]  S. Nauwelaerts,et al.  Fluoroscopic study of oral behaviours in response to the presence of a bit and the effects of rein tension , 2009 .

[2]  J D Greenspan,et al.  Stimulus features relevant to the perception of sharpness and mechanically evoked cutaneous pain. , 1991, Somatosensory & motor research.

[3]  Amanda K. Warren-Smith,et al.  The effect of double bridles and jaw-clamping crank nosebands on temperature of eyes and facial skin of horses , 2012 .

[4]  A. McLean The positive aspects of correct negative reinforcement , 2005 .

[5]  L. Roepstorff,et al.  Pilot study of behavior responses in young riding horses using 2 methods of making transitions from trot to walk , 2012 .

[6]  V. Casey,et al.  Rigid Junctional Tourniquet Effector Heads: Forces, Pressures, and Pressure Gradients Accompanying Target Artery Occlusion , 2015 .

[7]  Marie Eisersiö,et al.  How to build a rein tension meter , 2013 .

[8]  E. Welsh,et al.  Effect of flunixin meglumine on the thresholds to mechanical stimulation in healthy and lame sheep. , 1995, Research in veterinary science.

[9]  L. Roepstorff,et al.  Stride-related rein tension patterns in walk and trot in the ridden horse , 2015, Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica.

[10]  P. McGreevy,et al.  A preliminary report on estimating the pressures exerted by a crank noseband in the horse , 2013 .

[11]  C. Ecoffey,et al.  Tourniquet pain in a volunteer study: effect of changes in cuff width and pressure , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[12]  Robert A. Adams,et al.  Calculus: A Complete Course , 1994 .

[13]  A. Waterman,et al.  Measurement of mechanical thresholds, plasma cortisol and catecholamines in control and lame cattle: a preliminary study. , 1996, Research in veterinary science.

[14]  A. Eisen,et al.  Surgical tourniquets in orthopaedics. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  V. Casey,et al.  Asymptotic and Numerical Solutions for a Hammocking Model , 2002 .

[16]  Franklin Demana,et al.  Calculus: A Complete Course , 1999 .

[17]  P. McGreevy,et al.  The Effect of Noseband Tightening on Horses’ Behavior, Eye Temperature, and Cardiac Responses , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Vincent Casey,et al.  Pressure Measurement at Biomedical Interfaces , 2011 .

[19]  P. McGreevy,et al.  The effect of noseband tightness on rein tension in the ridden horse , 2013 .

[20]  John F Kragh,et al.  Tragedy into drama: an american history of tourniquet use in the current war. , 2013, Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals.

[21]  Diane E Gyi,et al.  Interface pressure data and the prediction of driver discomfort in road trials. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.