Audit Fees after Remediation of Internal Control Weaknesses

SYNOPSIS: In this study, we examine audit fees for SEC registrants that remediate previously disclosed material weaknesses in internal control. We find that remediating firms have lower audit fees when compared to firms that continue to report material weaknesses in internal control. However, the remediating firms continue to pay, in the year of remediation as well as one and two years subsequent to remediation, a significant audit fee premium compared to firms that have clean Section 404 reports in each of the first four years. Firms that had an adverse Section 404 report only in the first year, but remediated the problems in year two and had clean Section 404 reports in years three and four, pay an audit fee premium of 32 (21) percent in the third (fourth) year when compared to firms that had clean Section 404 reports in each of the first four years. The results, thus, suggest that audit fees are “sticky” for firms that have material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting, and suggest ...

[1]  Jacqueline S. Hammersley,et al.  Market reactions to the disclosure of internal control weaknesses and to the characteristics of those weaknesses under section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 , 2007 .

[2]  K. R. Subramanyam,et al.  Internal Control Weakness and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Sox Section 404 Disclosures , 2006 .

[3]  Dasaratha V. Rama,et al.  SOX Section 404 Material Weakness Disclosures and Audit Fees , 2006 .

[4]  Jian Zhou,et al.  The Failure to Remediate Previously-Disclosed Material Weaknesses in Internal Controls , 2012 .

[5]  Michael L. Ettredge,et al.  Financial Executive Qualifications, Financial Executive Turnover, and Adverse SOX 404 Opinions , 2010 .

[6]  Weili Ge,et al.  Determinants of Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting , 2006 .

[7]  D. R. Hermanson,et al.  Why Do Some Accelerated Filers with SOX Section 404 Material Weaknesses Provide Early Warning under Section 302 , 2009 .

[8]  Ryan LaFond,et al.  The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of Equity , 2008 .

[9]  Leslie D. Hodder,et al.  Internal Control Weaknesses and Information Uncertainty , 2007 .

[10]  Chan Li,et al.  Internal Control and Management Guidance , 2009 .

[11]  William R. Kinney,et al.  The Discovery and Reporting of Internal Control Deficiencies Prior to SOX-Mandated Audits , 2007 .

[12]  M. Zmijewski.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE ESTIMATION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS PREDICTION MODELS , 1984 .

[13]  Yinghong Zhang,et al.  Costs to Comply with SOX Section 404 , 2008 .

[14]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  INTERNAL CONTROL QUALITY AND AUDIT PRICING UNDER THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT , 2008 .

[15]  Karla M. Zehms,et al.  Changes in Corporate Governance Associated with the Revelation of Internal Control Material Weaknesses and their Subsequent Remediation , 2010 .

[16]  Jean C. Bedard,et al.  Audit Pricing and Internal Control Disclosures Among Non-Accelerated Filers , 2008 .

[17]  Michael L. Ettredge,et al.  The Impact of SOX Section 404 Internal Control Quality Assessment on Audit Delay in the SOX Era , 2006 .

[18]  Beng Wee Goh,et al.  Audit Committees, Boards of Directors, and Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control , 2009 .

[19]  Weili Ge,et al.  Accruals Quality and Internal Control Over Financial Reporting , 2007 .

[20]  Chris E. Hogan,et al.  Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Fees in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies? , 2008 .