Evaluation of built-in test

Built-in test (BIT) provides fault finding as a means to aid in system assembly, test, and maintenance. An investigation to evaluate BIT of a particular electronics board used in the in-flight entertainment system for Boeing 777s is described. We found BIT proved useful when failure occurrences were uniquely associated with the operating environment, situations which can result in no-fault found, or could-not duplicate (CND) failures upon test. We also observed cases where the BIT failed to observe failures, and in some cases pointed to the wrong cause of failure. These and other advantages and disadvantages of BIT implementation are discussed.

[1]  Michael Pecht,et al.  An investigation of ‘cannot duplicate’ failures , 1998 .

[2]  L. J. Popyack,et al.  Maintenance processor/time stress measurement device (MP/TSMD) use for failure trend analysis , 1992, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1992 Proceedings.

[3]  Wayne Moore,et al.  Applications of built-in-test equipment within large systems , 1986 .

[4]  T. H. Williams,et al.  Built-in test and the oceanographic sensor , 1994, Proceedings of OCEANS'94.

[5]  V. Ramappan,et al.  Are components still the major problem: a review of electronic system and device field failure returns , 1992 .

[6]  M. Pecht,et al.  Material failure mechanisms and damage models , 1991 .

[7]  F. J. Moreno.  BITE availability under operational constraints , 1989, Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[8]  D. Rosenthal,et al.  Predicting and eliminating built-in test false alarms , 1990 .

[9]  David M. Johnson,et al.  A review of fault management techniques used in safety-critical avionic systems , 1996 .

[10]  L. Y. Ungar.  Built-in test IC provides automatic test equipment capabilities , 1991, Conference Record AUTOTESTCON '91 IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference Improving Systems Effectiveness in the Changing Environment of the '90s.