Morphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch

The present study investigated morphological priming in Dutch and its time course in overt speech production using a long-lag priming paradigm. Prime words were compounds that were morphologically related to a picture name (e.g. the word jaszak, 'coat pocket' was used for a picture of a coat; Dutch jas) or form-related monomorphemic words (e.g. jasmijn, 'jasmine'). The morphologically related compounds could be semantically transparent (e.g. eksternest, 'magpie nest') or opaque (e.g. eksteroog, lit. 'magpie eye', 'corn', for a picture of a magpie, Dutch ekster). Behavioral and event-related potential (ERP) data were collected in two sessions. The production of morphologically related and complex words facilitated subsequent picture naming and elicited a reduced N400 compared with unrelated prime words. The effects did not differ for transparent and opaque relations. Mere form overlap between a prime word and a target picture name did not affect picture naming. These results extend previous findings from German to another language and demonstrate the feasibility of measuring cognitive ERP components during overt speech. Furthermore, the results suggest that morphological priming in language production cannot be reduced to semantic and phonological processing. The time course of these priming effects as reflected in the ERP measure is in accordance with a meta-analytic temporal estimate of morphological encoding in speaking [Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W.J.M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101-144.] suggesting that morphological relations are encoded at the word form level.

[1]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  On the Locus of Morphological Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Before or After Lexical Identification? , 1999, Brain and Language.

[2]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The impact of semantic transparency of morphologically complex words on picture naming , 2004, Brain and Language.

[3]  Activation of Embedded Words in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[4]  Dirk Koester,et al.  The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs , 2007, Brain and Language.

[5]  W. Levelt,et al.  The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components , 2004, Cognition.

[6]  W. Badecker Lexical composition and the production of compounds: Evidence from errors in naming , 2001 .

[7]  M. Taft Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming , 2000 .

[9]  Lesya Y. Ganushchak,et al.  Effects of time pressure on verbal self-monitoring: An ERP study , 2006, Brain Research.

[10]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[11]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiology of cognitive processing. , 1983, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  N. Schiller,et al.  Monitoring syllable boundaries during speech production , 2004, Brain and Language.

[14]  J. Knott,et al.  Regarding the American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature: a commentary on the proposal to change the 10-20 electrode designators. , 1993, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[15]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .

[16]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M. Kutas,et al.  An Electrophysiological Analysis of the Time Course of Conceptual and Syntactic Encoding during Tacit Picture Naming , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Geert Booij,et al.  The Morphology of Dutch , 2002 .

[19]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .

[20]  I. Christoffels,et al.  Bilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study , 2007, Brain Research.

[21]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[22]  C. Brunia,et al.  Psychophysiological brain research. , 1993 .

[23]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .

[24]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  Where and How Morphologically Complex Words Interplay with Naming Pictures , 2002, Brain and Language.

[25]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The identification of morphologically complex spoken words: continuous processing or decomposition? , 1991 .

[26]  Brian T. Gold,et al.  Neural Correlates of Morphological Decomposition during Visual Word Recognition , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of the time course of semantic and phonological encoding during implicit picture naming. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[28]  J. Grainger,et al.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: an ERP investigation. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[29]  A. Friederici,et al.  Inflectional and Derivational Morphology in the Mental Lexicon: Symmetries and Asymmetries in Repetition Priming , 1992 .

[30]  B MacWhinney,et al.  Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Imaging the past: Neural activation in frontal and temporal regions during regular and irregular past-tense processing , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[32]  Christopher J. James,et al.  On Semi-Blind Source Separation Using Spatial Constraints With Applications in EEG Analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Kathleen Rastle,et al.  ERP Evidence of Morphological Analysis from Orthography: A Masked Priming Study , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  M. de Vega,et al.  Event-related Brain Potentials Elicited by Morphological, Homographic, Orthographic, and Semantic Priming , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[36]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  R. Baayen,et al.  Frequency effects in compound production. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. de Vega,et al.  Human brain potentials indicate morphological decomposition in visual word recognition , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence on the time course of semantic and phonological processes in speech production. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[41]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Exploring the Activation of Semantic and Phonological Codes during Speech Planning with Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Gerhard Blanken,et al.  The Production of Nominal Compounds in Aphasia , 2000, Brain and Language.

[43]  Lesya Y. Ganushchak,et al.  Motivation and semantic context affect brain error-monitoring activity: An event-related brain potentials study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[44]  Andrea Krott,et al.  The Nature of Anterior Negativities Caused by Misapplications of Morphological Rules , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  A. Zwicky,et al.  The handbook of morphology , 2001 .

[46]  W J Levelt,et al.  Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  On the definition of word , 2004, Machine Translation.

[48]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  E. Williams,et al.  On the definition of word , 1987 .

[50]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Morphological decomposition involving non-productive morphemes: ERP evidence , 2003, Neuroreport.

[53]  H. Shu,et al.  Compound frequency effect in word production: Evidence from anomia , 2007, Brain and Language.

[54]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  A. Friederici,et al.  Morphosyntax, Prosody, and Linking Elements: The Auditory Processing of German Nominal Compounds , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Lexical stress encoding in single word production estimated by event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[57]  K H Ting,et al.  Automatic correction of artifact from single-trial event-related potentials by blind source separation using second order statistics only. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[58]  David Poeppel,et al.  Compound words and structure in the lexicon , 2007 .

[59]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  P. Zwitserlood Sublexical and morphological information in speech processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[61]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[62]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and inflectional morphology , 1988, Cognition.

[63]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .

[64]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[65]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Serial Order in Planning the Production of Successive Morphemes of a Word , 1996 .

[66]  Lars Borin,et al.  What is a lexical representation? , 1985, NODALIDA.

[67]  Thomas Benke,et al.  Naming by German compounds , 1994, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[68]  L. Feldman,et al.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Helen L Jamison,et al.  Morphology and the internal structure of words. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[71]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[72]  Marta Kutas,et al.  The intractability of scaling scalp distributions to infer neuroelectric sources. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[73]  Albert Costa,et al.  Different selection principles of freestanding and bound morphemes in language production. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  M. Garrett Processes in language production , 1988 .

[75]  M. Aronoff Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes , 1993 .

[76]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Rightward incrementality in encoding simple phrasal forms in speech production : Verb-particle combinations , 1998 .

[77]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The processing of free and bound gender-marked morphemes in speech production: evidence from Dutch. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[78]  H. Lüders,et al.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[79]  P. Zwitserlood,et al.  Morphological effects on speech production: Evidence from picture naming , 2000 .

[80]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[81]  F. Newmeyer Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey , 1989 .