Robust order-based methods for feature description

Feature-based methods have found increasing use in many applications such as object recognition, 3D reconstruction and mosaicing. In this paper, we focus on the problem of matching such features. While a histogram-of-gradients type methods such as SIFT, GLOH and Shape Context are currently popular, several papers have suggested using orders of pixels rather than raw intensities and shown improved results for some applications. The papers suggest two different techniques for doing so: (1) A Histogram of Relative Orders in the Patch and (2) A Histogram of LBP codes. While these methods have shown good performance, they neglect the fact that the orders can be quite noisy in the presence of Gaussian noise. In this paper, we propose changes to these approaches to make them robust to Gaussian noise. We also show how the descriptors can be matched using recently developed more advanced techniques to obtain better matching performance. Finally, we show that the two methods have complimentary strengths and that by combining the two descriptors, one obtains much better results than either of them considered separately. The results are shown on the standard 2D Oxford and the 3D Caltech datasets.

[1]  Ramin Zabih,et al.  Non-parametric Local Transforms for Computing Visual Correspondence , 1994, ECCV.

[2]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[3]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  An Affine Invariant Interest Point Detector , 2002, ECCV.

[4]  Hai Tao,et al.  A novel feature descriptor invariant to complex brightness changes , 2009, CVPR.

[5]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Improving Descriptors for Fast Tree Matching by Optimal Linear Projection , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Yan Ke,et al.  PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors , 2004, CVPR 2004.

[9]  Xiaoyang Tan,et al.  Enhanced Local Texture Feature Sets for Face Recognition Under Difficult Lighting Conditions , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Haibin Ling,et al.  An Efficient Earth Mover's Distance Algorithm for Robust Histogram Comparison , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Visvanathan Ramesh,et al.  An Intensity-augmented Ordinal Measure for Visual Correspondence , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[12]  Visvanathan Ramesh,et al.  Sudden illumination change detection using order consistency , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[13]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Efficient shape matching using shape contexts , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Evaluation of Features Detectors and Descriptors based on 3D Objects , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[15]  Marko Heikkilä,et al.  Description of interest regions with local binary patterns , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Michael Werman,et al.  A Linear Time Histogram Metric for Improved SIFT Matching , 2008, ECCV.

[17]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Visvanathan Ramesh,et al.  Order consistent change detection via fast statistical significance testing , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[19]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A sparse texture representation using local affine regions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Ordinal Measures for Image Correspondence , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[22]  Binoy Pinto,et al.  Speeded Up Robust Features , 2011 .

[23]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  An Affine Invariant Salient Region Detector , 2004, ECCV.

[24]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Christopher G. Harris,et al.  A Combined Corner and Edge Detector , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[26]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors , 2005, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  William M. Wells,et al.  SIFT-Rank: Ordinal description for invariant feature correspondence , 2009, CVPR.